tester
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
QA tester. Verifies code against requirements — in OpenSpec mode, test cases are seeded directly from WHEN/THEN scenarios in specs/. Use after the reviewer has approved the implementation (APPROVE or APPROVE WITH COMMENTS). Do not use before review — reviewer goes first. Always produces a PASS/FAIL verdict with reproducible bug reports. Do not invoke if an active OpenSpec change exists and a different role's artifact is the next expected output.
11 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- programmerraja/claude-code-toolboxtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- KhristenkoE/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 12, 2026
- webiny/webiny-jstheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- zakame/brooks-agent-teamtheir own version, first seen Sep 25, 2026
- NirDiamant/Agentic_Engineeringtheir own version, first seen Sep 21, 2026
- gustavo-em/orchestrator-featurestheir own version, first seen Sep 7, 2026
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 11
- webiny/webiny-js★ 8ksame name
- NirDiamant/Agentic_Engineering★ 34same name
- Victorcorcos/skills★ 7same name
- Cogni-AI-OU/cogni-ai-agent-skills★ 4same name
- zakame/brooks-agent-team★ 4same name
- erikfiala/e2e-tester★ 2same name
- KJ-devs/setupClaudeCode★ 2same name
- aiperceivable/apcore-skills★ 1same name
- gustavo-em/orchestrator-features★ 1same name
- programmerraja/claude-code-toolbox★ 1same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.