planner
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Technical planner. Turns requirements into an ordered task list with verify steps, writing directly into tasks.md and design.md when an OpenSpec change is active. Use after the analyst role has produced requirements, or when the user asks to plan, decompose, or architect a solution. Always use before coding starts. Do not invoke if an active OpenSpec change exists and a different role's artifact is the next expected output.
32 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- AJschoons/robowrighttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- gopalparashar421/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Pubx-ai/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Vinix24/vnx-orchestrationtheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- musterd-io/musterdtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jackstine/forgectltheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use executor, debugger and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MooseDesign1Skillexecutor
Main executor agent. Triggered by /executor, or natural language such as: "build this feature", "execute the feature", "start building", "map the codebase", "scan the code", "resume building", "continue the build", "dev status", "where are we on development", "what's built". Do NOT trigger for /planner, /plan:project, /plan:feature, /plan:status, /product-designer, /pd:*, /ds-designer, /ds-*.
Also in 3 projects that use this
JohnJBorenSkilldebugger
Systematic debugging workflows, root cause analysis, and troubleshooting patterns
Also in 3 projects that use this
JetBrainsSkillreview-plan
Manually re-run the autonomous plan review (Phase 2 — consistency + structural). The same review runs automatically as the first phase of /execute-tracks; this command is for re-runs after inline replanning or whenever the plan needs explicit re-validation. TRIGGER when: user asks to re-validate the plan after inline replanning; user requests explicit plan review outside /execute-tracks. SKIP: /execute-tracks already running State 0 in this session (autonomous Phase 2 path will fire) — do not double-run.
Also in 3 projects that use this
tesla0225Skillorchestrator
Issue/要件を受けたら分解→担当割当→実装→検証→統合を回す手順。未整備なら /repo-init でbootstrap。
Also in 4 projects that use this
Harut8Skillarchitect
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillcode-review
Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions32 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 32
- penpot/penpot★ 62ksame name
- am-will/codex-skills★ 1ksame name
- toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity★ 952same name
- Vinix24/vnx-orchestration★ 63same name
- Tariux/AI-Skills-Not-Awesome★ 49same name
- openclosed-org/axum-harness★ 48same name
- FlineDev/TandemKit★ 42same name
- digitalocean-labs/do-app-platform-skills★ 38same name
- MooseDesign1/DDD-DesignDrivenDevelopment★ 9same name
- jackstine/forgectl★ 8same name
22 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 27 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 27 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

