retro
Skill82 starsChanged 42 days agoMITView on GitHub
SLASH COMMAND — type /retro to run a retrospective on a coding session and propose improvements to the agent's environment (checks, pointers, steering files), never to the code. Use after a session where the agent struggled, repeated a mistake, or burned tokens finding something — or periodically, to keep CLAUDE.md from growing without bound. Report-only.
193 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- rodeyseijkens/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Yesterday-AI/ytstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- gaoyu06/harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Schepetkov/claude-skills-game-UEtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- tornikegomareli/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- devjiwonchoi/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use plan-tune, ios-clean and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ShreyRaviSkillplan-tune
Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required.
Also in 9 projects that use this
Saqlain-811Skillios-clean
Remove the DebugBridge SPM package and all #if DEBUG wiring from an iOS app. (gstack)
Also in 5 projects that use this
Saqlain-811Skillios-fix
Autonomous iOS bug fixer. (gstack)
Also in 5 projects that use this
seek888Skillpair-agent
Pair a remote AI agent with your browser. One command generates a setup key and prints instructions the other agent can follow to connect. Works with OpenClaw, Hermes, Codex, Cursor, or any agent that can make HTTP requests. The remote agent gets its own tab with scoped access (read+write by default, admin on request). Use when asked to "pair agent", "connect agent", "share browser", "remote browser", "let another agent use my browser", or "give browser access". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "pair agent", "connect agent", "share my browser", "remote browser access".
Also in 11 projects that use this
ShreyRaviSkilllanding-report
Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)
Also in 8 projects that use this
timurgaleevSkilldocument-generate
Generate missing docs for a feature, module or project as tutorials, how-tos, reference and explanation.
Also in 7 projects that use this
- +1 more from Saqlain-811
- +2 more from ShreyRavi
Other versions193 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 193
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- formbricks/formbricks★ 13ksame name
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9ksame name
- bergside/awesome-design-skills★ 2.9ksame name
- MiniMax-AI/minimax-code★ 2.2ksame name
- DenchHQ/DenchClaw★ 1.7ksame name
- DenchHQ/ironclaw★ 1.7ksame name
183 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ai-reviewSkill
- brieflySkill
- commit-batchingSkill
- commit-batchSkill
- create-alertSkill
- disclose-projectSkill
- discloseSkill
- evolve-claude-mdSkill
- figure-reviewSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handoffSkill
- lit-reviewSkill
- overbakedSkill
- pathfinderSkill
- pickupSkill
- recover-sessionsSkill
- repo-initSkill
- reviewer-2Skill
- slack-messageSkill
- spot-aiSkill
- tab-setupSkill
- unstaleSkill
- worklogSkill
- write-new-skillSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 171 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 27
Existing guardrails: Before proposing any check, read what the repo already runs: its CI workflow, pre-commit config, lint scripts, test …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 171 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
The user has asked for a retrospective. Look back at a coding session and propose improvements to the agent's environment — checks, pointers, steering files, tool access — so the next session goes better. The code the session produced is out of scope.
This is the counterweight to evolve-claude-md: that skill adds durable knowledge to CLAUDE.md after every session; this one finds what should have been a lint, a doc behind a pointer, or nothing at all.
Hard gate: report-only. Propose edits, checks, and cuts; make none of them. The user applies what they accept.
Scope
- Session. The current session by default — the conversation context you already hold. With
--session <id|path>, read that transcript instead:~/.claude/projects/<project-slug>/<id>.jsonl(or under$CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR/projectswhen set). Transcripts are large; don't read one end to end. Grep for the signals in the table below (repeated reads of the same path, failed commands, retries, long search runs) and read around the hits. - Steering files. The target repo's
CLAUDE.md(or the canonicalAGENTS.mdit redirects to), itsdocs/, and any skill or hook the session used. Add~/.claude/CLAUDE.mdwith--global, or whenever a finding clearly belongs to every project rather than this one. - Existing guardrails. Before proposing any check, read what the repo already runs: its CI workflow, pre-commit config, lint scripts, test command. A check that exists but is unwired or silently broken is the finding — not a reinvention.
What to look for
| Category | Signal in the session | Fix shape |
| Navigation | The agent took several tool calls to find a file, a definition, or a fact; a hidden dependency between files surprised it | A pointer (one line in CLAUDE.md naming where the thing lives), or a docs/ file the pointer targets |
| Automated checks | A mistake that a lint, type check, test, or filesystem rule would have caught; a repo with no guardrail at all (no CI, no pre-commit, no lint) | The cheapest deterministic check the repo's language and existing guardrail allow. A repo with no guardrail is itself a finding, not a neutral default |
| Steering → check | A CLAUDE.md rule that describes a mechanical pattern — a banned call, an import shape, a file-location rule, a value that must match another | Build the check; cut the prose to a pointer at the check. Reserve prose for judgement calls no check could substitute for |
| Steering → docs | A CLAUDE.md passage that is reference material — a procedure, a design history, a lessons-learned block — read in full on every session but needed in few | Move it to docs/<topic>.md; leave a one-line pointer |
| No-ops | An instruction that did not change the agent's behavior — the session followed it by default, or ignored it without consequence | Cut it. Quote the instruction and say which of the two it was |
| Tool economy | An expensive or repeated tool call that a script, a cached result, or a narrower query would have replaced; a tool whose definition costs more context than its use returned | Name the cheaper path |
| Information access | A fact the agent needed and could not reach — a log, a service, an environment variable, a file outside the repo | Name what access would have closed the gap, and its cost |
Routing ladder. For every finding that would touch a steering file, ask in order: (1) can a deterministic check enforce it? (2) is it reference material that belongs behind a pointer? (3) only then, is it a judgement call that earns prose? Default to the check. A rule stated in CLAUDE.md is advisory; a rule enforced by a lint is a fact.
Output
Lead with the session in two lines: what it was doing, and the one thing that cost it the most.
Then one entry per finding, ordered by severity (a missing guardrail or a repeated mistake outranks a slow lookup):
### [category] — short label severity: high | med | low
Evidence: what happened in the session (quote or tool-call count; file:line for steering text)
Proposal: the concrete change — the check to add, the pointer text, the lines to cut
Cost: what applying it takes (minutes / a new script / a settings change the user must paste)Close with a summary table — category, label, severity, cost — and a one-line tally of what the proposals would do to the steering file's size (lines added vs. cut). If the session surfaced nothing, say so in one line and stop; do not manufacture findings.
Secrets and PII. Transcripts and steering files can hold credentials, tokens, and third-party personal data. Never quote a credential into the report; name the finding without the value. The archived report inherits the sensitivity of whatever it quotes — say so when a finding quotes session text that identifies someone.
Archive
Unless --no-archive was passed: after emitting the report, write it verbatim to <repo-root>/.ai/reviews/<YYYY-MM-DD>-retro[-<session-slug>].md (mkdir -p "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.ai/reviews"; suffix -2, -3… on filename collision). Best-effort — if the cwd isn't a git repo or the write fails, add a one-line note and move on; never alter the report itself. Probe the ignore with the file path at repo root, not the bare directory: if git check-ignore -q "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.ai/reviews/probe.md" exits non-zero, warn and suggest adding .ai/ to .gitignore. (git check-ignore -q .ai false-negatives for the directory-form .ai/ pattern whenever the directory does not yet exist.)
Provenance header. Prepend a YAML block to the archived file only (never to the report shown to the user):
---
skill: retro
skill-version: <toolkit version>
reviewed-repo: <repo basename> @ <short SHA>[ (dirty)]
cli: <claude --version>
date: <YYYY-MM-DD>
---Collect the values with:
SD="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:+$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/retro}"; SD="${SD:-$HOME/.claude/skills/retro}"
cat "$SD/.version" 2>/dev/null || echo unknown # skill-version ("unknown" under plugin install)
git rev-parse --short HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo unknown
git status --porcelain 2>/dev/null | head -1 # non-empty → append " (dirty)"
claude --version 2>/dev/null || echo unknown.version is written into the deployed skill dir by sync.sh push; it is absent under a plugin install, which is expected. Resolve any value that fails to unknown — never drop the key, and never let a failed lookup block or alter the archive.
Anti-rationalization
| Excuse | Rebuttal |
| "The session went fine, nothing to report." | A clean session still reads every line of CLAUDE.md. Check the no-op and steering → docs rows against the file before concluding. |
| "I'll just fix the lint while I'm here." | Report-only. A proposed check the user never saw is a change to their live environment; write the proposal, not the file. |
| "This rule is too nuanced for a check." | Classify it first. "Don't call X" and "Y must equal Z" are mechanical however carefully they're worded. Only cross-file consistency and style judgement earn prose. |
| "Adding the rule to CLAUDE.md is faster than writing the check." | Faster today, and loaded into every session after. The check costs once; the prose costs forever. |
| "The transcript is too big to read." | Don't read it. Grep for the signals; read around the hits. |
Verification
- No file outside
.ai/reviews/was modified. - Every proposal that touches a steering file passed the routing ladder, and the entry says which rung it landed on.
- Each "automated check" finding names the existing guardrail it builds on (or states that none exists).
- No credential or token value appears in the report.
- Findings are ordered by severity, and the closing tally states lines added vs. cut.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

