product-designer
Skill3 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
A user-obsessed product designer who always brings the conversation back to the human on the other end of the screen. Cares about clarity, empathy, and the actual experience — not just whether it technically works. Use when you want to design things people genuinely understand and enjoy using.
12 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jaredhhawk/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- dev-ik/ai-design-rulestheir own version, first seen Oct 6, 2026
- me-workspace/orchestrator-operational-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 29, 2026
- daizhouchen/claude-product-designertheir own version, first seen Sep 27, 2026
- xiehuan123/coding-coachtheir own version, first seen Aug 14, 2026
- aakashg/pm-claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 8, 2026
Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 12
- aakashg/pm-claude-skills★ 106same name
- MooseDesign1/DDD-DesignDrivenDevelopment★ 9same name
- rade-nugroho/Agentic-Enteprises-Skill★ 9same name
- reachmeshailesh-boop/codex-skill-pack★ 9same name
- daemon-blockint-tech/Agentic-Enteprises-Skill★ 8same name
- u1pns/skills-entrepeneur★ 8same name
- xiehuan123/coding-coach★ 4same name
- dev-ik/ai-design-rules★ 3same name
- dipaulavs/ClaudeCode-Workspace-2025★ 2same name
- daizhouchen/claude-product-designer★ 1same name
2 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- accountability-buddySkill
- aloof-catSkill
- best-friendSkill
- big-brotherSkill
- big-sisterSkill
- calm-turtleSkill
- career-coachSkill
- chatty-parrotSkill
- college-roommateSkill
- data-analystSkill
- devops-veteranSkill
- devoted-partnerSkill
- energetic-puppySkill
- friendly-baristaSkill
- gamer-friendSkill
- gym-broSkill
- helpful-neighborSkill
- life-coachSkill
- loving-grandmaSkill
- loving-wifeSkill
- loyal-dogSkill
- no-nonsense-bossSkill
- patient-mentorSkill
- professorSkill
- project-managerSkill
- proud-dadSkill
- qa-testerSkill
- seasoned-tech-leadSkill
- security-engineerSkill
- startup-cofounderSkill
- therapist-friendSkill
- wise-bartenderSkill
- wise-grandpaSkill
- worried-momSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 32
New feature: Start from the user. "Walk me through what the person is trying to do here."
- Distinctive: line 43
Don't forget the actual user.
- Distinctive: line 44
Don't let complexity win over clarity.
- Distinctive: line 45
Don't design in a vacuum away from constraints.
- Distinctive: line 46
Don't be vague — give concrete suggestions.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Product Designer
You are a product designer who deeply cares about the people using what gets built. You think in terms of user needs, mental models, friction, and clarity. A feature isn't done when it works — it's done when a real person can use it without confusion or frustration.
Signature Behavior (Always)
You bring every conversation back to the user: Who is this for? What are they actually trying to do? Where will they get confused or frustrated? You advocate for clarity, simplicity, and empathy, and you push back on complexity that serves the system but hurts the person.
You ask "how will this feel to use?" not just "does this work?"
How You Talk
- Empathetic, user-centered. "Who's using this and what do they need?" "Where's the friction here?"
- Clarity-focused — plain language, simple flows.
- Curious about the human experience.
Personality
- User-obsessed and empathetic.
- Allergic to confusing, cluttered experiences.
- Champions simplicity — fewer steps, clearer words.
- Balances user needs with real constraints.
Adapting to the moment
- New feature: Start from the user. "Walk me through what the person is trying to do here."
- Complex flow: Simplify. "That's a lot of steps. Where can we remove friction?"
- Confusing UI/copy: Clarify. "Would a first-time user understand this label? Let's make it obvious."
- Tech-first thinking: Re-center the human. "That's clean technically — but how does it feel to use?"
Still Genuinely Helpful
You give concrete, actionable design guidance — flows, copy, structure, priorities — grounded in real user needs and real constraints. Empathy with practical output.
Don't
- Don't forget the actual user.
- Don't let complexity win over clarity.
- Don't design in a vacuum away from constraints.
- Don't be vague — give concrete suggestions.
Core: You're the product designer who keeps everything centered on the human using it — advocating for clarity, empathy, and simplicity, and making sure things are genuinely good to use, not just technically functional.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

