using-superpowers
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
167 other projects use a version of this, 150 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DemonDamon/AgenticXedited, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- sudeepgupta90/my-ai-marketplaceedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- roundpilot/superpowers-antigravityedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimizedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lingyired/status-trioedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- BrightGold70/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-code-review
中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈
Also in 8 projects that use this
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化
Also in 8 projects that use this
obraSkilldiagnosing-superpowers
Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.
Also in 19 projects that use this
kntismSkillcondition-based-waiting
Use when tests have race conditions, timing dependencies, or inconsistent pass/fail behavior - replaces arbitrary timeouts with condition polling to wait for actual state changes, eliminating flaky tests from timing guesses
Also in 3 projects that use this
frankxaiSkilldefense-in-depth
Use when invalid data causes failures deep in execution, requiring validation at multiple system layers - validates at every layer data passes through to make bugs structurally impossible
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillroot-cause-tracing
Use when errors occur deep in execution and you need to trace back to find the original trigger - systematically traces bugs backward through call stack, adding instrumentation when needed, to identify source of invalid data or incorrect behavior
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +3 more from Leodorareluctant259
Other versions167 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 150
- obra/superpowers★ 314k53% same
- openai/plugins★ 7.8k55% same
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6k97% same
- lingyired/status-trio★ 1.8k53% same
- pcvelz/superpowers★ 1.3k88% same
- DemonDamon/AgenticX★ 1k93% same
- coco-research/coco★ 79795% same
- Trevoke/org-gtd.el★ 48553% same
- koaning/wigglystuff★ 45555% same
- oasm-platform/open-asm★ 27297% same
140 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 17
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimized★ 146same name
- shibit-net/xuanji-community★ 90same name
- GEd520/legados★ 75same name
- roman01la/skills-agents★ 48same name
- zhouguoqing/QianYuan.AIAgenticFramework★ 35same name
- PANYUXIN6/pyx-skills★ 8same name
- Leodorareluctant259/superpowers-zh★ 5same name
- rzx007/openharness-ts★ 3same name
- rzx007/Vykor★ 3same name
7 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- api-auto-testingSkill
- auto-brainstormingSkill
- auto-executing-plansSkill
- auto-tech-designSkill
- auto-writing-plansSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- change-historySkill
- change-propagationSkill
- code-prettySkill
- executing-plansSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- generating-htmlSkill
- og-brainstormingSkill
- og-executing-plansSkill
- og-writing-plansSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- requesting-code-reviewSkill
- risk-annotationSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- subagent-drivenSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- tech-designSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- verifying-specSkill
- writing-plansSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 4 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
4
Common
Most of the 153 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 7
If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill.
- Common: line 11
If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill.
- Common: line 13
IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE.
- Very specific: line 20
When you call TaskCreate (or any task-creating tool), the task subject and description MUST be written in the same primary language the …
- Distinctive: line 22
If the user converses in Korean → write task subject/description in Korean
- Distinctive: line 23
If the user converses in English → write in English
- Distinctive: line 24
If mixed → default to the language of the user's most recent substantive message
- Distinctive: line 38
If CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or AGENTS.md says "don't use TDD" and a skill says "always use TDD," follow the user's instructions.
- Very specific: line 42
In Claude Code: Use the Skill tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you—follow it directly.
- Very specific: line 44
In Copilot CLI: Use the skill tool. Skills are auto-discovered from installed plugins.
- Distinctive: line 48
In other environments: Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.
- Common: line 111
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 153 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<SUBAGENT-STOP>
If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill.
</SUBAGENT-STOP><EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill.IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.
This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
</EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
Conversation Language Mirroring (REQUIRED)
When you call TaskCreate (or any task-creating tool), the task subject and description MUST be written in the same primary language the user uses in this conversation:
- If the user converses in Korean → write task subject/description in Korean
- If the user converses in English → write in English
- If mixed → default to the language of the user's most recent substantive message
This applies to ALL task creation, including tasks created by skills with Checklist sections (brainstorming, tech-design, writing-plans, executing-plans). Do NOT default to English when the user is clearly working in Korean — the task list is part of the user's reading experience.
The same rule applies to user-facing announcements ("Using X skill to do Y...") and progress notices: mirror the user's language unless the skill explicitly mandates a fixed-language output template.
Instruction Priority
Superpowers skills override default system prompt behavior, but user instructions always take precedence:
- User's explicit instructions (CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, direct requests) — highest priority
- Superpowers skills — override default system behavior where they conflict
- Default system prompt — lowest priority
If CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or AGENTS.md says "don't use TDD" and a skill says "always use TDD," follow the user's instructions. The user is in control.
How to Access Skills
In Claude Code: Use the Skill tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you—follow it directly. Never use the Read tool on skill files.
In Copilot CLI: Use the skill tool. Skills are auto-discovered from installed plugins. The skill tool works the same as Claude Code's Skill tool.
In Gemini CLI: Skills activate via the activate_skill tool. Gemini loads skill metadata at session start and activates the full content on demand.
In other environments: Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.
Platform Adaptation
Skills use Claude Code tool names. Non-CC platforms: see references/copilot-tools.md (Copilot CLI), references/codex-tools.md (Codex) for tool equivalents. Gemini CLI users get the tool mapping loaded automatically via GEMINI.md.
Using Skills
The Rule
Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action. Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.
digraph skill_flow {
"User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
"About to EnterPlanMode?" [shape=doublecircle];
"Already brainstormed?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke brainstorming skill" [shape=box];
"Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
"Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
"Create TaskCreate task per item" [shape=box];
"Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
"Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
"About to EnterPlanMode?" -> "Already brainstormed?";
"Already brainstormed?" -> "Invoke brainstorming skill" [label="no"];
"Already brainstormed?" -> "Might any skill apply?" [label="yes"];
"Invoke brainstorming skill" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
"Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
"Has checklist?" -> "Create TaskCreate task per item" [label="yes"];
"Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
"Create TaskCreate task per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}Red Flags
These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:
| Thought | Reality |
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I can check git/files quickly" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. |
| "Let me gather information first" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. |
| "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. |
| "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read current version. |
| "This doesn't count as a task" | Action = task. Check for skills. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
| "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. |
Skill Priority
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
- Process skills first (brainstorming, debugging) - these determine HOW to approach the task
- Implementation skills second (frontend-design, mcp-builder) - these guide execution
"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills. "Fix this bug" → debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
Skill Types
Rigid (TDD, debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
Flexible (patterns): Adapt principles to context.
The skill itself tells you which.
User Instructions
Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

