simple-release
Skill1 starsChanged 43 days agoMITView on GitHub
Cut a release with a semantic version bump, a changelog from commit history, and a git tag. Use only when the user asks to release, bump the version, or write a changelog.
- Commits and pushes
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- simple-cantoneseSkill
- simple-checkSkill
- simple-chineseSkill
- simple-cloudflareSkill
- simple-code-reviewSkill
- simple-commitSkill
- simple-debugSkill
- simple-full-refactorSkill
- simple-launchSkill
- simple-orchestratorSkill
- simple-readmeSkill
- simple-refactorSkill
- simple-restructureSkill
- simple-supabaseSkill
- simple-text-cleanupSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Check state: clean working tree, on the release branch, up to date.
- Very specific: line 22
Only fix, perf, and others: patch
- Distinctive: line 23
Before 1.0.0, breaking changes bump minor
- Distinctive: line 60
Never push commits or tags unless asked.
- Distinctive: line 61
Never move or delete an existing tag.
- Very specific: line 62
Do not add Co-Authored-By or any AI attribution to the release commit.
- Distinctive: line 63
If the commits do not follow a convention, read the diffs and group the changes yourself, and say that you did.
- Very specific: line 64
Create a GitHub release with gh release create only when asked.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Simple Release
Prepare a release from the commit history. Propose first, then apply only after the user confirms the version.
Workflow
- Check state: clean working tree, on the release branch, up to date. Stop and say so if not.
- Find the last tag (
git describe --tags --abbrev=0) and read the commits since it (git log <tag>..HEAD --oneline). With no tag, use the full history. - Pick the bump from the commits:
- Breaking change (
!after the prefix, orBREAKING CHANGE): major - Any
feat: minor - Only
fix,perf, and others: patch - Before 1.0.0, breaking changes bump minor
- Breaking change (
- Show the proposed version and changelog entry, and wait for confirmation.
- Apply: update the version file (
package.json,pyproject.toml, or the one the project uses), add the entry toCHANGELOG.md, and commit aschore(release): vX.Y.Z. - Tag the commit
vX.Y.Z. - Report the version, the tag, and the next command to push. Push only when the user asks.
Changelog entry
Newest first, one section per version, grouped by type. Write for users, not for the commit author.
## [1.4.0] - 2026-09-30
### Added
- Avatar upload on the profile page
### Fixed
- Login redirect loop on expired sessions
### Changed
- Faster chapter loading| Commit prefix | Section |
| feat | Added |
| fix | Fixed |
| perf, refactor | Changed |
| revert | Removed or Reverted |
| docs, style, test, build, ci, chore | Leave out, unless users would care |
- Rewrite commit subjects into plain sentences, and merge duplicates.
- Flag breaking changes at the top of the entry with what to do about them.
- Link the compare URL at the bottom if the repo has a remote.
Rules
- Never push commits or tags unless asked.
- Never move or delete an existing tag.
- Do not add
Co-Authored-Byor any AI attribution to the release commit. - If the commits do not follow a convention, read the diffs and group the changes yourself, and say that you did.
- Create a GitHub release with
gh release createonly when asked.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

