agentleFS
denniemokdenniemok/simple-skills/simple-readme/SKILL.md

simple-readme

Skill1 starsChanged 43 days agoMITView on GitHub

Create or update a project README in a developer-focused layout: Requirements, Quick Setup, and Structure. Use when the user asks to write, create, update, or refresh a README, or mentions simple-readme.

  • Reads credentials

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write a practical, scannable README for developers cloning the repo, not a marketing page.

    line 15
  2. Distinctive:

    Every README has these three, in this order, with a short intro before them:

    line 19
  3. Distinctive:

    No placeholder text left

    line 49
  4. Distinctive:

    Keep accurate URLs, license, warnings, and integration notes.

    line 62
  5. Distinctive:

    If it is a public marketing page (badges, screenshots, disclaimers), ask whether to convert to dev style or only refresh the setup parts.

    line 64

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Simple README

Write a practical, scannable README for developers cloning the repo, not a marketing page. Direct and neutral, short paragraphs, bullets and tables over walls of text. No emojis unless the project already uses them.

Required sections

Every README has these three, in this order, with a short intro before them:

  1. Requirements: runtime, services, and external dependencies
  2. Quick Setup: install, env, run (dev and prod when applicable)
  3. Structure: ASCII folder tree with short comments on key paths

Everything else is optional. Add an optional section only when it helps someone run, deploy, or integrate the project. Skip it if there is nothing substantive to say.

See template.md for the skeleton.

Workflow

  1. Mode: no README means write from scratch. If one exists, update in place, keep accurate content, and align it to this format. If the user gives a section list, follow it and still include the three required sections.
  2. Gather facts. Read the repo before writing and never invent ports, env vars, or commands.

    SourceExtract
    package.json, pyproject.toml, requirements.txtScripts, runtime version, framework
    .env.exampleEnv var names, defaults, required or optional
    docker-compose.yml, DockerfileDocker steps
    SQL setup files, migrationsDatabase step
    Entry files, src/ layoutStructure tree
    Existing READMEUnique content worth keeping
  3. Optional sections. Ask the user which to include when several could apply, such as Scripts, Deployment, Security, Logging, Integration, Routes. Skip the question if the request already says. Include these without asking when the file exists: .env.example (env table), docker-compose.yml (Docker step), SQL setup file (Database step).
  4. Draft from the template, then verify:
    • Requirements list real dependencies only
    • Commands match the project's scripts
    • Env table matches .env.example
    • Structure tree matches the actual folders
    • No placeholder text left

Section notes

  • Intro: 1 to 3 sentences on what it does, the stack, and key external services or sibling repos.
  • Requirements: bullets, with optional integrations marked optional.
  • Quick Setup: numbered ### steps. Use exact commands, and note non-default ports and build-time env vars.
  • Env table: columns Variable, Required, Description.
  • Structure: repo root name, comment important paths inline, do not list every file. Add a small table for folder conventions if the layout is not obvious.
  • Optional sections go before Structure.

Updating an existing README

  • Keep accurate URLs, license, warnings, and integration notes.
  • Replace outdated commands and env vars using the repo as the source of truth.
  • If it is a public marketing page (badges, screenshots, disclaimers), ask whether to convert to dev style or only refresh the setup parts.

Avoid

  • Generic filler like "a modern, scalable solution"
  • Commands that are not in the project
  • Full API docs, link to them instead
  • Optional sections with one vague sentence

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.