logging-patterns
Skill763 starsChanged 56 days agoMITView on GitHub
Java logging best practices with SLF4J, structured logging (JSON), and MDC for request tracing. Includes AI-friendly log formats for Claude Code debugging. Use when user asks about logging, debugging application flow, or analyzing logs.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 83
When asking AI to analyze logs:
- Distinctive: line 98
Follow request flow via requestId
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Logging Patterns Skill
Effective logging for Java applications with focus on structured, AI-parsable formats.
When to Use
- User says "add logging" / "improve logs" / "debug this"
- Analyzing application flow from logs
- Setting up structured logging (JSON)
- Request tracing with correlation IDs
- AI/Claude Code needs to analyze application behavior
AI-Friendly Logging
Key insight: JSON logs are better for AI analysis - faster parsing, fewer tokens, direct field access.
Why JSON for AI/Claude Code?
# Text format - AI must "interpret" the string
2026-01-29 10:15:30 INFO OrderService - Order 12345 created for user-789, total: 99.99
# JSON format - AI extracts fields directly
{"timestamp":"2026-01-29T10:15:30Z","level":"INFO","orderId":12345,"userId":"user-789","total":99.99}| Aspect | Text | JSON |
| Parsing | Regex/interpretation | Direct field access |
| Token usage | Higher (repeated patterns) | Lower (structured) |
| Error extraction | Parse stack trace text | exception field |
| Filtering | grep patterns | jq queries |
Recommended Setup for AI-Assisted Development
# application.yml - JSON by default
logging:
structured:
format:
console: logstash # Spring Boot 3.4+
# When YOU need to read logs manually:
# Option 1: Use jq
# tail -f app.log | jq .
# Option 2: Switch profile temporarily
# java -jar app.jar --spring.profiles.active=human-logsLog Format Optimized for AI Analysis
{
"timestamp": "2026-01-29T10:15:30.123Z",
"level": "INFO",
"logger": "com.example.OrderService",
"message": "Order created",
"requestId": "req-abc123",
"traceId": "trace-xyz",
"orderId": 12345,
"userId": "user-789",
"duration_ms": 45,
"step": "payment_completed"
}Key fields for AI debugging:
requestId- group all logs from same requeststep- track progress through flowduration_ms- identify slow operationslevel- quick filter for errors
Reading Logs with AI/Claude Code
When asking AI to analyze logs:
# Get recent errors
cat app.log | jq 'select(.level == "ERROR")' | tail -20
# Follow specific request
cat app.log | jq 'select(.requestId == "req-abc123")'
# Find slow operations
cat app.log | jq 'select(.duration_ms > 1000)'AI can then:
- Parse JSON directly (no guessing)
- Follow request flow via requestId
- Identify exactly where errors occurred
- Measure timing between steps
Quick Setup (Spring Boot 3.4+)
Native Structured Logging
Spring Boot 3.4+ has built-in support - no extra dependencies!
# application.yml
logging:
structured:
format:
console: logstash # or "ecs" for Elastic Common Schema
# Supported formats: logstash, ecs, gelfProfile-Based Switching
# application.yml (default - JSON for AI/prod)
spring:
profiles:
default: json-logs
---
spring:
config:
activate:
on-profile: json-logs
logging:
structured:
format:
console: logstash
---
spring:
config:
activate:
on-profile: human-logs
# No structured format = human-readable default
logging:
pattern:
console: "%d{HH:mm:ss.SSS} %-5level [%thread] %logger{36} - %msg%n"Usage:
# Default: JSON (for AI, CI/CD, production)
./mvnw spring-boot:run
# Human-readable when needed
./mvnw spring-boot:run -Dspring.profiles.active=human-logsSetup for Spring Boot < 3.4
Logstash Logback Encoder
pom.xml:
<dependency>
<groupId>net.logstash.logback</groupId>
<artifactId>logstash-logback-encoder</artifactId>
<version>7.4</version>
</dependency>logback-spring.xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<configuration>
<!-- JSON (default) -->
<springProfile name="!human-logs">
<appender name="JSON" class="ch.qos.logback.core.ConsoleAppender">
<encoder class="net.logstash.logback.encoder.LogstashEncoder">
<includeMdcKeyName>requestId</includeMdcKeyName>
<includeMdcKeyName>userId</includeMdcKeyName>
</encoder>
</appender>
<root level="INFO">
<appender-ref ref="JSON"/>
</root>
</springProfile>
<!-- Human-readable (optional) -->
<springProfile name="human-logs">
<appender name="CONSOLE" class="ch.qos.logback.core.ConsoleAppender">
<encoder>
<pattern>%d{HH:mm:ss.SSS} %-5level [%thread] %logger{36} - %msg%n</pattern>
</encoder>
</appender>
<root level="INFO">
<appender-ref ref="CONSOLE"/>
</root>
</springProfile>
</configuration>Adding Custom Fields (Logstash Encoder)
import static net.logstash.logback.argument.StructuredArguments.kv;
// Fields appear as separate JSON keys
log.info("Order created",
kv("orderId", order.getId()),
kv("userId", user.getId()),
kv("total", order.getTotal()),
kv("step", "order_created")
);
// Output:
// {"message":"Order created","orderId":123,"userId":"u-456","total":99.99,"step":"order_created"}SLF4J Basics
Logger Declaration
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
@Service
public class OrderService {
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(OrderService.class);
}
// Or with Lombok
@Slf4j
@Service
public class OrderService {
// use `log` directly
}Parameterized Logging
// ✅ GOOD: Evaluated only if level enabled
log.debug("Processing order {} for user {}", orderId, userId);
// ❌ BAD: Always concatenates
log.debug("Processing order " + orderId + " for user " + userId);
// ✅ For expensive operations
if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
log.debug("Full order details: {}", order.toJson());
}Log Levels
| Level | When | Example |
| ERROR | Failures needing attention | Unhandled exception, service down |
| WARN | Unexpected but handled | Retry succeeded, deprecated API used |
| INFO | Business events | Order created, payment processed |
| DEBUG | Technical details | Method params, SQL queries |
| TRACE | Very detailed | Loop iterations (rarely used) |
log.error("Payment failed", kv("orderId", id), kv("reason", reason), exception);
log.warn("Retry succeeded", kv("attempt", 3), kv("orderId", id));
log.info("Order shipped", kv("orderId", id), kv("trackingNumber", tracking));
log.debug("Fetching from DB", kv("query", "findById"), kv("id", id));MDC (Mapped Diagnostic Context)
MDC adds context to every log entry in a request - essential for tracing.
Request ID Filter
@Component
@Order(Ordered.HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE)
public class RequestContextFilter extends OncePerRequestFilter {
@Override
protected void doFilterInternal(HttpServletRequest request,
HttpServletResponse response,
FilterChain chain) throws ServletException, IOException {
try {
String requestId = Optional.ofNullable(request.getHeader("X-Request-ID"))
.filter(s -> !s.isBlank())
.orElse(UUID.randomUUID().toString().substring(0, 8));
MDC.put("requestId", requestId);
response.setHeader("X-Request-ID", requestId);
chain.doFilter(request, response);
} finally {
MDC.clear();
}
}
}Add User Context
// After authentication
MDC.put("userId", authentication.getName());
// All subsequent logs include userId automatically
log.info("User action performed"); // {"userId":"john123","message":"User action performed"}MDC in Async Operations
// MDC doesn't auto-propagate to new threads!
// ✅ Copy MDC context
Map<String, String> context = MDC.getCopyOfContextMap();
CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> {
try {
if (context != null) MDC.setContextMap(context);
log.info("Async task running"); // Has requestId, userId
} finally {
MDC.clear();
}
});What to Log
Business Events (INFO)
// Include key identifiers and state
log.info("Order created",
kv("orderId", id),
kv("userId", userId),
kv("total", total),
kv("itemCount", items.size()),
kv("step", "order_created"));
log.info("Payment processed",
kv("orderId", id),
kv("amount", amount),
kv("method", "card"),
kv("step", "payment_completed"));External Calls (with timing)
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
try {
Result result = externalService.call(params);
log.info("External call succeeded",
kv("service", "PaymentGateway"),
kv("operation", "charge"),
kv("duration_ms", System.currentTimeMillis() - start));
return result;
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error("External call failed",
kv("service", "PaymentGateway"),
kv("operation", "charge"),
kv("duration_ms", System.currentTimeMillis() - start),
e);
throw e;
}Flow Steps (for AI tracing)
public Order processOrder(CreateOrderRequest request) {
log.info("Processing started", kv("step", "start"), kv("requestData", request.summary()));
Order order = createOrder(request);
log.info("Order created", kv("step", "order_created"), kv("orderId", order.getId()));
validateInventory(order);
log.info("Inventory validated", kv("step", "inventory_ok"), kv("orderId", order.getId()));
processPayment(order);
log.info("Payment processed", kv("step", "payment_done"), kv("orderId", order.getId()));
log.info("Processing completed", kv("step", "complete"), kv("orderId", order.getId()));
return order;
}What NOT to Log
// ❌ NEVER log sensitive data
log.info("Login", kv("password", password)); // Passwords
log.info("Payment", kv("cardNumber", card)); // Full card numbers
log.info("Request", kv("token", jwtToken)); // Tokens
log.info("User", kv("ssn", socialSecurity)); // PII
// ✅ Safe alternatives
log.info("Login attempted", kv("userId", userId));
log.info("Payment", kv("cardLast4", last4));
log.info("Token validated", kv("subject", sub), kv("exp", expiry));Exception Logging
Log Once at Boundary
// ❌ BAD: Logs same exception multiple times
void methodA() {
try { methodB(); }
catch (Exception e) { log.error("Error", e); throw e; } // Log #1
}
void methodB() {
try { methodC(); }
catch (Exception e) { log.error("Error", e); throw e; } // Log #2
}
// ✅ GOOD: Log at service boundary only
@RestControllerAdvice
public class GlobalExceptionHandler {
@ExceptionHandler(Exception.class)
public ResponseEntity<?> handle(Exception e, HttpServletRequest request) {
log.error("Request failed",
kv("path", request.getRequestURI()),
kv("method", request.getMethod()),
kv("errorType", e.getClass().getSimpleName()),
e); // Full stack trace
return ResponseEntity.status(500).body(errorResponse);
}
}Include Context
// ❌ Useless
log.error("Error occurred", e);
// ✅ Useful for debugging
log.error("Order processing failed",
kv("orderId", orderId),
kv("step", "payment"),
kv("userId", userId),
kv("attemptNumber", attempt),
e);Quick Reference
// === Setup ===
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(MyClass.class);
// === Logging with structured fields ===
import static net.logstash.logback.argument.StructuredArguments.kv;
log.info("Event", kv("key1", value1), kv("key2", value2));
log.error("Failed", kv("context", ctx), exception);
// === MDC ===
MDC.put("requestId", requestId);
MDC.put("userId", userId);
// ... all logs now include these
MDC.clear(); // cleanup
// === Levels ===
log.error() // Failures
log.warn() // Handled issues
log.info() // Business events
log.debug() // Technical detailsAnalyzing Logs (AI/Human)
# Pretty print JSON logs
tail -f app.log | jq .
# Filter errors
cat app.log | jq 'select(.level == "ERROR")'
# Follow request flow
cat app.log | jq 'select(.requestId == "abc123")'
# Find slow operations (>1s)
cat app.log | jq 'select(.duration_ms > 1000)'
# Get timeline of steps
cat app.log | jq 'select(.requestId == "abc123") | {time: .timestamp, step: .step, message: .message}'Related Skills
spring-boot-patterns- Spring Boot configurationjpa-patterns- Database logging (SQL queries)- Future:
observability-patterns- Metrics, tracing, full observability
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 5
- piomin/claude-ai-spring-boot★ 1.4k45% same
- piomin/claude-ai-quarkus★ 721% same
- iCesofT/awesome-ai★ 198% same
- piomin/spring-boot-app-with-claudecode★ 198% same
- mvonline/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Wrote their own version · 5
- DIL8654/claude-code-dotnet-template★ 8same name
- ku5ic/claude-kit★ 2same name
- Abdox-menara/guard-skills★ 0same name
- Nadav011/apex-skills★ 0same name
- techdeveloper-org/mcp-jenkins-ci★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use spring-boot and code-quality.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ffsshhttiikkSkillspring-boot
Spring Boot framework and Java enterprise patterns
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillcode-quality
Statically check changed C# against the same deterministic rules github-code-quality[bot] runs on pull requests, so a contributor can fix likely findings before opening the PR and keep the bot's inline comments to a minimum. Activate when a contributor asks to "check code quality", "run code quality on my changes", "will the code quality bot complain", "pre-check before I open the PR", "code quality check", or similar. Scoped to C#. Reads the diff and compares it against the enumerated csharp-code-quality rule set below — no CodeQL download or build required. This is a fast approximation of a dataflow engine, not a reproduction; report accordingly. Does NOT apply fixes unless explicitly asked.
Also in 3 projects that use this
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- api-contract-reviewSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- changelog-generatorSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- concurrency-reviewSkill
- design-patternsSkill
- git-commitSkill
- issue-triageSkill
- java-code-reviewSkill
- java-migrationSkill
- jpa-patternsSkill
- maven-dependency-auditSkill
- performance-smell-detectionSkill
- security-auditSkill
- solid-principlesSkill
- spring-boot-patternsSkill
- test-qualitySkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

