java-code-review
Skill763 starsChanged 56 days agoMITView on GitHub
Systematic code review for Java with null safety, exception handling, concurrency, and performance checks. Use when user says "review code", "check this PR", "code review", or before merging changes.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Before merging a PR
- Distinctive: line 14
After implementing a feature
- Very specific: line 70
Use Optional for return types that may be absent
- Very specific: line 71
Use Objects.requireNonNull() for constructor/method params
- Distinctive: line 110
Use specific exception types
- Distinctive: line 112
Consider custom exceptions for domain errors
- Very specific: line 152
Not using List.of(), Set.of(), Map.of() for immutable collections
- Distinctive: line 190
Check-then-act patterns without atomicity
- Very specific: line 199
Consider @ThreadSafe / @NotThreadSafe annotations
- Very specific: line 259
Not using instanceof pattern matching (Java 16+)
- Very specific: line 287
Not using try-with-resources for Closeable/AutoCloseable
- Very specific: line 369
Not using primitive streams (IntStream, LongStream)
- Distinctive: line 394
Don't repeat obvious issues - group similar findings
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Java Code Review Skill
Systematic code review checklist for Java projects.
When to Use
- User says "review this code" / "check this PR" / "code review"
- Before merging a PR
- After implementing a feature
Review Strategy
- Quick scan - Understand intent, identify scope
- Checklist pass - Go through each category below
- Summary - List findings by severity (Critical → Minor)
Output Format
## Code Review: [file/feature name]
### Critical
- [Issue description + line reference + suggestion]
### Improvements
- [Suggestion + rationale]
### Minor/Style
- [Nitpicks, optional improvements]
### Good Practices Observed
- [Positive feedback - important for morale]Review Checklist
1. Null Safety
Check for:
// ❌ NPE risk
String name = user.getName().toUpperCase();
// ✅ Safe
String name = Optional.ofNullable(user.getName())
.map(String::toUpperCase)
.orElse("");
// ✅ Also safe (early return)
if (user.getName() == null) {
return "";
}
return user.getName().toUpperCase();Flags:
- Chained method calls without null checks
- Missing
@Nullable/@NonNullannotations on public APIs Optional.get()withoutisPresent()check- Returning
nullfrom methods that could returnOptionalor empty collection
Suggest:
- Use
Optionalfor return types that may be absent - Use
Objects.requireNonNull()for constructor/method params - Return empty collections instead of null:
Collections.emptyList()
2. Exception Handling
Check for:
// ❌ Swallowing exceptions
try {
process();
} catch (Exception e) {
// silently ignored
}
// ❌ Catching too broad
catch (Exception e) { }
catch (Throwable t) { }
// ❌ Losing stack trace
catch (IOException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e.getMessage());
}
// ✅ Proper handling
catch (IOException e) {
log.error("Failed to process file: {}", filename, e);
throw new ProcessingException("File processing failed", e);
}Flags:
- Empty catch blocks
- Catching
ExceptionorThrowablebroadly - Losing original exception (not chaining)
- Using exceptions for flow control
- Checked exceptions leaking through API boundaries
Suggest:
- Log with context AND stack trace
- Use specific exception types
- Chain exceptions with
cause - Consider custom exceptions for domain errors
3. Collections & Streams
Check for:
// ❌ Modifying while iterating
for (Item item : items) {
if (item.isExpired()) {
items.remove(item); // ConcurrentModificationException
}
}
// ✅ Use removeIf
items.removeIf(Item::isExpired);
// ❌ Stream for simple operations
list.stream().forEach(System.out::println);
// ✅ Simple loop is cleaner
for (Item item : list) {
System.out.println(item);
}
// ❌ Collecting to modify
List<String> names = users.stream()
.map(User::getName)
.collect(Collectors.toList());
names.add("extra"); // Might be immutable!
// ✅ Explicit mutable list
List<String> names = users.stream()
.map(User::getName)
.collect(Collectors.toCollection(ArrayList::new));Flags:
- Modifying collections during iteration
- Overusing streams for simple operations
- Assuming
Collectors.toList()returns mutable list - Not using
List.of(),Set.of(),Map.of()for immutable collections - Parallel streams without understanding implications
Suggest:
List.copyOf()for defensive copiesremoveIf()instead of iterator removal- Streams for transformations, loops for side effects
4. Concurrency
Check for:
// ❌ Not thread-safe
private Map<String, User> cache = new HashMap<>();
// ✅ Thread-safe
private Map<String, User> cache = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
// ❌ Check-then-act race condition
if (!map.containsKey(key)) {
map.put(key, computeValue());
}
// ✅ Atomic operation
map.computeIfAbsent(key, k -> computeValue());
// ❌ Double-checked locking (broken without volatile)
if (instance == null) {
synchronized(this) {
if (instance == null) {
instance = new Instance();
}
}
}Flags:
- Shared mutable state without synchronization
- Check-then-act patterns without atomicity
- Missing
volatileon shared variables - Synchronized on non-final objects
- Thread-unsafe lazy initialization
Suggest:
- Prefer immutable objects
- Use
java.util.concurrentclasses AtomicReference,AtomicIntegerfor simple cases- Consider
@ThreadSafe/@NotThreadSafeannotations
5. Java Idioms
equals/hashCode:
// ❌ Only equals without hashCode
@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) { ... }
// Missing hashCode!
// ❌ Mutable fields in hashCode
@Override
public int hashCode() {
return Objects.hash(id, mutableField); // Breaks HashMap
}
// ✅ Use immutable fields, implement both
@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) {
if (this == o) return true;
if (!(o instanceof User user)) return false;
return Objects.equals(id, user.id);
}
@Override
public int hashCode() {
return Objects.hash(id);
}toString:
// ❌ Missing - hard to debug
// No toString()
// ❌ Including sensitive data
return "User{password='" + password + "'}";
// ✅ Useful for debugging
@Override
public String toString() {
return "User{id=" + id + ", name='" + name + "'}";
}Builders:
// ✅ For classes with many optional parameters
User user = User.builder()
.name("John")
.email("john@example.com")
.build();Flags:
equalswithouthashCode- Mutable fields in
hashCode - Missing
toStringon domain objects - Constructors with > 3-4 parameters (suggest builder)
- Not using
instanceofpattern matching (Java 16+)
6. Resource Management
Check for:
// ❌ Resource leak
FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream(file);
// ... might throw before close
// ✅ Try-with-resources
try (FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream(file)) {
// ...
}
// ❌ Multiple resources, wrong order
try (BufferedWriter writer = new BufferedWriter(new FileWriter(file))) {
// FileWriter might not be closed if BufferedWriter fails
}
// ✅ Separate declarations
try (FileWriter fw = new FileWriter(file);
BufferedWriter writer = new BufferedWriter(fw)) {
// Both properly closed
}Flags:
- Not using try-with-resources for
Closeable/AutoCloseable - Resources opened but not in try-with-resources
- Database connections/statements not properly closed
7. API Design
Check for:
// ❌ Boolean parameters
process(data, true, false); // What do these mean?
// ✅ Use enums or builder
process(data, ProcessMode.ASYNC, ErrorHandling.STRICT);
// ❌ Returning null for "not found"
public User findById(Long id) {
return users.get(id); // null if not found
}
// ✅ Return Optional
public Optional<User> findById(Long id) {
return Optional.ofNullable(users.get(id));
}
// ❌ Accepting null collections
public void process(List<Item> items) {
if (items == null) items = Collections.emptyList();
}
// ✅ Require non-null, accept empty
public void process(List<Item> items) {
Objects.requireNonNull(items, "items must not be null");
}Flags:
- Boolean parameters (prefer enums)
- Methods with > 3 parameters (consider parameter object)
- Inconsistent null handling across similar methods
- Missing validation on public API inputs
8. Performance Considerations
Check for:
// ❌ String concatenation in loop
String result = "";
for (String s : strings) {
result += s; // Creates new String each iteration
}
// ✅ StringBuilder
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
for (String s : strings) {
sb.append(s);
}
// ❌ Regex compilation in loop
for (String line : lines) {
if (line.matches("pattern.*")) { } // Compiles regex each time
}
// ✅ Pre-compiled pattern
private static final Pattern PATTERN = Pattern.compile("pattern.*");
for (String line : lines) {
if (PATTERN.matcher(line).matches()) { }
}
// ❌ N+1 in loops
for (User user : users) {
List<Order> orders = orderRepo.findByUserId(user.getId());
}
// ✅ Batch fetch
Map<Long, List<Order>> ordersByUser = orderRepo.findByUserIds(userIds);Flags:
- String concatenation in loops
- Regex compilation in loops
- N+1 query patterns
- Creating objects in tight loops that could be reused
- Not using primitive streams (
IntStream,LongStream)
9. Testing Hints
Suggest tests for:
- Null inputs
- Empty collections
- Boundary values
- Exception cases
- Concurrent access (if applicable)
Severity Guidelines
| Severity | Criteria |
| Critical | Security vulnerability, data loss risk, production crash |
| High | Bug likely, significant performance issue, breaks API contract |
| Medium | Code smell, maintainability issue, missing best practice |
| Low | Style, minor optimization, suggestion |
Token Optimization
- Focus on changed lines (use
git diff) - Don't repeat obvious issues - group similar findings
- Reference line numbers, not full code quotes
- Skip files that are auto-generated or test fixtures
Quick Reference Card
| Category | Key Checks |
| Null Safety | Chained calls, Optional misuse, null returns |
| Exceptions | Empty catch, broad catch, lost stack trace |
| Collections | Modification during iteration, stream vs loop |
| Concurrency | Shared mutable state, check-then-act |
| Idioms | equals/hashCode pair, toString, builders |
| Resources | try-with-resources, connection leaks |
| API | Boolean params, null handling, validation |
| Performance | String concat, regex in loop, N+1 |
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- iCesofT/awesome-ai★ 127% same
- mvonline/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Wrote their own version · 4
- sivaprasadreddy/sivalabs-agent-skills★ 195same name
- theepan/ai-agent-skills★ 1same name
- cnzeropro/ai-playbook★ 0same name
- zavier/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- api-contract-reviewSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- changelog-generatorSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- concurrency-reviewSkill
- design-patternsSkill
- git-commitSkill
- issue-triageSkill
- java-migrationSkill
- jpa-patternsSkill
- logging-patternsSkill
- maven-dependency-auditSkill
- performance-smell-detectionSkill
- security-auditSkill
- solid-principlesSkill
- spring-boot-patternsSkill
- test-qualitySkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

