retrospective
Skill17 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generates a sprint or milestone retrospective by analyzing completed work, velocity, blockers, and patterns. Produces actionable insights for the next iteration.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 53 edited versions we read keep these.
13
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 6
Before Phase 1, inspect commits from the last two weeks.
- Distinctive: line 16
Before loading any data, glob for an existing retrospective file:
- Distinctive: line 22
If a matching file is found, present the user with:
- Distinctive: line 31
Wait for user selection before continuing.
- Distinctive: line 38
Read the sprint or milestone plan from the appropriate location:
- Distinctive: line 54
If the user chooses [A], collect the data and continue to Phase 3 using what they provide.
- Distinctive: line 55
If the user chooses [B], stop here.
- Distinctive: line 59
Read the git log for the period covered by the sprint or milestone to understand what was actually committed and when.
- Very specific: line 79
Read previous retrospectives (if any) from production/sprints/ or production/milestones/ to check:
- Very specific: line 187
Ask: "May I write this to production/sprints/sprint-[N]-retrospective.md?" (or the milestone path if applicable)
- Distinctive: line 189
If yes, write the file, creating the directory if needed.
- Distinctive: line 191
If no, stop here. Verdict: BLOCKED — user declined write.
- Very specific: line 197
Run $sprint-plan to incorporate the action items and velocity data into the next sprint.
- Very specific: line 198
If this was a milestone retrospective, run $gate-check to formally assess readiness for the next phase.
- Distinctive: line 205
Every action item must have an owner and a deadline.
- Distinctive: line 206
Check whether previous action items were completed.
- Distinctive: line 207
If this is a milestone retrospective, also evaluate whether the milestone goals were achieved and what that means for the overall project …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 53 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Before Phase 1, inspect commits from the last two weeks.
Phase 1: Parse Arguments
Determine whether this is a sprint retrospective (sprint-N) or a milestone retrospective (milestone-name).
Phase 1b: Check for Existing Retrospective
Before loading any data, glob for an existing retrospective file:
- For sprint retrospectives:
production/retrospectives/retro-[sprint-slug]-*.md(also checkproduction/sprints/sprint-[N]-retrospective.mdas an alternate location) - For milestone retrospectives:
production/retrospectives/retro-[milestone-name]-*.md
If a matching file is found, present the user with:
An existing retrospective was found: [filename]
[A] Update existing retrospective — load it and add/revise sections
[B] Start fresh — generate a new retrospective, archiving the old oneWait for user selection before continuing. If updating, read the existing file and carry its content forward into the generation phase, revising sections with new data.
Phase 2: Load Sprint or Milestone Data
Read the sprint or milestone plan from the appropriate location:
- Sprint plans:
production/sprints/ - Milestone definitions:
production/milestones/
If the file does not exist or is empty, output:
"No sprint data found for [sprint/milestone]. Run
$sprint-statusto generate sprint data first, or provide the sprint details manually."
Then ask the user directly to present two options:
- [A] Provide data manually — ask the user to paste or describe the sprint tasks, dates, and outcomes; use that as the source of truth for the retrospective.
- [B] Stop — abort the skill. Verdict: BLOCKED — no sprint data available.
If the user chooses [A], collect the data and continue to Phase 3 using what they provide. If the user chooses [B], stop here.
Extract: planned tasks, estimated effort, owners, and goals.
Read the git log for the period covered by the sprint or milestone to understand what was actually committed and when.
Phase 3: Analyze Completion and Trends
Scan for completed and incomplete tasks by comparing the plan against actual deliverables. Check for:
- Tasks completed as planned
- Tasks completed but modified from the plan
- Tasks carried over (not completed)
- Tasks added mid-sprint (unplanned work)
- Tasks removed or descoped
Scan the codebase for TODO/FIXME trends:
- Count current TODO/FIXME/HACK comments
- Compare to previous sprint counts if available (check previous retrospectives)
- Note whether technical debt is growing or shrinking
Read previous retrospectives (if any) from production/sprints/ or production/milestones/ to check:
- Were previous action items addressed?
- Are the same problems recurring?
- How has velocity trended?
Phase 4: Generate the Retrospective
## Retrospective: [Sprint N / Milestone Name]
Period: [Start Date] -- [End Date]
Generated: [Date]
### Metrics
| Metric | Planned | Actual | Delta |
|--------|---------|--------|-------|
| Tasks | [X] | [Y] | [+/- Z] |
| Completion Rate | -- | [Z%] | -- |
| Story Points / Effort Days | [X] | [Y] | [+/- Z] |
| Bugs Found | -- | [N] | -- |
| Bugs Fixed | -- | [N] | -- |
| Unplanned Tasks Added | -- | [N] | -- |
| Commits | -- | [N] | -- |
### Velocity Trend
| Sprint | Planned | Completed | Rate |
|--------|---------|-----------|------|
| [N-2] | [X] | [Y] | [Z%] |
| [N-1] | [X] | [Y] | [Z%] |
| [N] (current) | [X] | [Y] | [Z%] |
**Trend**: [Increasing / Stable / Decreasing]
[One sentence explaining the trend]
### What Went Well
- [Observation backed by specific data or examples]
- [Another positive observation]
- [Recognize specific contributions or decisions that paid off]
### What Went Poorly
- [Specific issue with measurable impact -- e.g., "Feature X took 5 days
instead of estimated 2, blocking tasks Y and Z"]
- [Another issue with impact]
- [Do not assign blame -- focus on systemic causes]
### Blockers Encountered
| Blocker | Duration | Resolution | Prevention |
|---------|----------|------------|------------|
| [What blocked progress] | [How long] | [How it was resolved] | [How to prevent recurrence] |
### Estimation Accuracy
| Task | Estimated | Actual | Variance | Likely Cause |
|------|-----------|--------|----------|--------------|
| [Most overestimated task] | [X] | [Y] | [+Z] | [Why] |
| [Most underestimated task] | [X] | [Y] | [-Z] | [Why] |
**Overall estimation accuracy**: [X%] of tasks within +/- 20% of estimate
[Analysis: Are we consistently over- or under-estimating? For which types of
tasks? What adjustment should we apply?]
### Carryover Analysis
| Task | Original Sprint | Times Carried | Reason | Action |
|------|----------------|---------------|--------|--------|
| [Task that was not completed] | [Sprint N-X] | [N] | [Why] | [Complete / Descope / Redesign] |
### Technical Debt Status
- Current TODO count: [N] (previous: [N])
- Current FIXME count: [N] (previous: [N])
- Current HACK count: [N] (previous: [N])
- Trend: [Growing / Stable / Shrinking]
- [Note any areas of concern]
### Previous Action Items Follow-Up
| Action Item (from Sprint N-1) | Status | Notes |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------|
| [Previous action] | [Done / In Progress / Not Started] | [Context] |
### Action Items for Next Iteration
| # | Action | Owner | Priority | Deadline |
|---|--------|-------|----------|----------|
| 1 | [Specific, measurable action] | [Who] | [High/Med/Low] | [When] |
| 2 | [Another action] | [Who] | [Priority] | [When] |
### Process Improvements
- [Specific change to how we work, with expected benefit]
- [Another improvement -- keep it to 2-3 actionable items, not a wish list]
### Summary
[2-3 sentence overall assessment: Was this a good sprint/milestone? What is
the single most important thing to change going forward?]Phase 5: Save Retrospective
Present the retrospective and top findings to the user (completion rate, velocity trend, top blocker, most important action item).
Ask: "May I write this to production/sprints/sprint-[N]-retrospective.md?" (or the milestone path if applicable)
If yes, write the file, creating the directory if needed. Verdict: COMPLETE — retrospective saved.
If no, stop here. Verdict: BLOCKED — user declined write.
Phase 6: Next Steps
- Run
$sprint-planto incorporate the action items and velocity data into the next sprint. - If this was a milestone retrospective, run
$gate-checkto formally assess readiness for the next phase.
Guidelines
- Be honest and specific. Vague retrospectives ("communication could be better") produce vague improvements. Use data and examples.
- Focus on systemic issues, not individual blame.
- Limit action items to 3-5. More than that dilutes focus.
- Every action item must have an owner and a deadline.
- Check whether previous action items were completed. Recurring unaddressed items are a process smell.
- If this is a milestone retrospective, also evaluate whether the milestone goals were achieved and what that means for the overall project timeline.
Other versions62 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 10
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27k43% same
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios★ 9396% same
- tranhieutt/software_development_department★ 7168% same
- CoralGame/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 1982% same
- lilangMax/ClaudeCodeGameStudios★ 896% same
- hongyuanc/codex-game-studios★ 559% same
- dawn840705/claude-code-studios★ 196% same
- HunLuanZhiZhu/Game-Studios-Plugin★ 169% same
- scotidev/GameDevStudio★ 182% same
- venus2099/codex-game-studios★ 143% same
Wrote their own version · 52
- alibaba/MNN★ 16ksame name
- glebis/claude-skills★ 404same name
- pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 324same name
- blacklanternsecurity/red-run★ 296same name
- The01Geek/prflow★ 99same name
- PAIR-code/deliberate-lab★ 98same name
- AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standards★ 82same name
- cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio★ 40same name
- sohei56/maul-team★ 17same name
- ariaxhan/kernel-claude★ 14same name
42 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository92 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adoptSkill
- api-cost-gateSkill
- architecture-decisionSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- art-bibleSkill
- asset-auditSkill
- asset-specSkill
- balance-checkSkill
- brainstormSkill
- bug-reportSkill
- bug-triageSkill
- changelogSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- consistency-checkSkill
- content-auditSkill
- create-architectureSkill
- create-control-manifestSkill
- create-epicsSkill
- create-prdSkill
- create-storiesSkill
- day-one-patchSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-systemSkill
- dev-storySkill
- doc-relinkSkill
- estimateSkill
- gate-checkSkill
- governance-bible-initSkill
- helpSkill
- hotfixSkill
- humanize-koreanSkill
- humanize-redoSkill
- humanizeSkill
- launch-checklistSkill
- legacy-purgeSkill
- lesson-logSkill
- lesson-reviewSkill
- localizeSkill
- map-systemsSkill
- milestone-reviewSkill
- onboardSkill
- patch-notesSkill
- perf-profileSkill
- playtest-reportSkill
- product-conceptSkill
- project-stage-detectSkill
- propagate-design-changeSkill
- prototypeSkill
- qa-planSkill
- quick-designSkill
- regression-suiteSkill
- release-checklistSkill
- remove-bgSkill
- reverse-documentSkill
- review-all-gddsSkill
- scope-checkSkill
- security-auditSkill
- self-loopSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

