refactor
Skill52 starsChanged 49 days agoMITView on GitHub
Behavior-preserving restructuring of code outside the current diff, such as extracting modules, renaming across files, or paying down debt. Triggers "refactor X", "restructure", "extract Y from Z". Just-changed code goes to /zero-tech-debt.
196 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Doist/todoist-aitheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- Doist/todoist-clitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- rvdbreemen/OTGW-firmwaretheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- paulocsb/worldcup-fifa-pooltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- DnsQueen/orcinus-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- taixuann/development-spacetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ascii-diagram, debug-fix and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
SethGammonSkillascii-diagram
Generate perfectly aligned ASCII diagrams — architecture, flow, sequence, box-and-arrow. Uses a programmatic character-grid approach so alignment is guaranteed by math, not token prediction. Includes post-render verification.
Also in 4 projects that use this
zebbernSkilldebug-fix
Find and fix a bug or issue — from any source (GitHub issue, error message, user report, or observed behavior)
Also in 4 projects that use this
parcadeiSkillagent-context-isolation
Agent Context Isolation
Also in 3 projects that use this
parcadeiSkillagentica-infrastructure
Reference guide for Agentica multi-agent infrastructure APIs
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +8 more from parcadei
Other versions196 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 196
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41ksame name
- unkeyed/unkey★ 5.5ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3★ 3.9ksame name
- adobe/S3Mock★ 1.2ksame name
- SethGammon/Citadel★ 927same name
- poshan0126/dotclaude★ 871same name
- JordanCoin/codemap★ 710same name
- membrane/api-gateway★ 658same name
186 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- auditSkill
- autoresearchSkill
- buildSkill
- case-studySkill
- ccSkill
- codexSkill
- componentSkill
- context-docSkill
- dr-initSkill
- dr-reviewSkill
- fixSkill
- freezeSkill
- handoffSkill
- harvestSkill
- hookSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- poke-holesSkill
- proof-of-workSkill
- retroSkill
- review-batchSkill
- share-learningSkill
- shipSkill
- storiesSkill
- triageSkill
- zero-tech-debtSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 169 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 11
Create each new agent with spawn_agent, deliver context to a running agent with send_message, trigger another turn for an idle existing …
- Very specific: line 62
Standalone Codex branch: follow the lifecycle and serialization rules at the top.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 169 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Refactoring Workflow
Standalone Codex
Create each new agent with spawn_agent, deliver
context to a running agent with send_message, trigger another turn for an idle
existing agent with followup_task, wait with wait_agent, and stop a current
turn with interrupt_agent only when necessary. Never spawn codex-verifier
and never run codex-run.ts from inside Codex.
Writers share the working tree unless the live host explicitly offers isolation. Assign non-overlapping ownership and serialize planner handoff, implementer, and test-writer phases; only read-only reviewers may overlap. Codex implementers are not promised Claude worktree isolation.
You are in Maestro orchestration mode. Delegate immediately.
Workflow
- Clarify - A refactor's target shape is rarely fixed by the request. Before exploring, run clarifying rounds through the host's question tool until no fork is left: target shape, what must not change, and what "done" looks like; recommendation first on each
- Explore - Spawn
exploreagent to analyze current code - Plan - Spawn
planneragent to design refactoring approach - Implement - Spawn
implementeragent to refactor - Test - Spawn
testeragent to verify behavior unchanged - Review - Spawn
revieweragent to check quality - Learn - Store patterns discovered during refactoring
Agent Delegation
Spawn explore and planner first — they accept thin prompts because they discover what they need from the codebase:
Agent(explore, "Analyze the code to refactor: $ARGUMENTS. Identify patterns, issues, dependencies.")
Agent(planner, "Design refactoring approach based on analysis. Keep behavior unchanged.")Claude: then assemble the implementer prompt from the actual planner output. The Claude implementer runs in an isolated worktree with no access to prior agent results, so paste the real plan — not "according to plan":
- The user's refactor target (
$ARGUMENTS) verbatim - The planner's step-by-step plan, including file paths and each move/rename/extract operation
- Any "preserve behavior" invariants the planner called out
- The test command that must remain green
- Scope: "only the files in the plan; do not touch anything else"
Now spawn:
Agent(implementer, "<the assembled briefing above — all five items inline>")
Agent(tester, "Verify refactored code behaves identically to original.")
Agent(reviewer, "Review refactoring for quality and completeness.")Standalone Codex branch: follow the lifecycle and serialization rules at
the top. Use a fresh read-only reviewer for the independent pass after the
writer and tester finish.
Refactors are a top source of subtle regressions. The one cross-model Codex review per PR (run by /ship, or on request) covers the refactor diff; do not run a separate Codex pass here. The reviewer agent above is the in-workflow review.
Output
Return a summary:
- What changed: Brief description
- Files modified: List of files
- Tests passing: Verification status
- Improvements: What's better now
- Learnings: Patterns worth remembering
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

