agentleFS
darkroomengineeringdarkroomengineering/cc-settings/skills/codex/SKILL.md

codex

Skill52 starsChanged 49 days agoMITView on GitHub

Claude-to-Codex bridge to delegate bulk mechanical work, get an independent cross-model diff review, or ask a read-only question. Triggers only when the user names Codex, as in "use codex", "have codex review", "cross-check with codex", "ask codex".

135 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use ios-sync, compare-screenshots and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-sync

    Regenerate the iOS debug bridge against the latest upstream gstack templates. (gstack)

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • transitive-bullshitSkill

    compare-screenshots

    Compare screenshots against the intended design, distinguishing approved references from historical baselines. Use for iterative implementation matching, before/after visual review, objective image telemetry, or checking a lone capture for flat, empty, or badly framed content.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • dzhngSkill

    implement-spec-with-codex

    Run [implement-spec](../implement-spec/SKILL.md) with Codex doing the implementation passes while you orchestrate, integrate, and review. Use when the user asks to implement a spec with Codex, or to run implement-spec with Codex as the implementer.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-clean

    Remove the DebugBridge SPM package and all #if DEBUG wiring from an iOS app. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • john-data-chenSkill

    touchdesigner-mcp

    Control a running TouchDesigner instance via twozero MCP — create operators, set parameters, wire connections, execute Python, build real-time visuals. 36 native tools.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • math-incSkill

    minecraft-modpack-server

    Set up a modded Minecraft server from a CurseForge/Modrinth server pack zip. Covers NeoForge/Forge install, Java version, JVM tuning, firewall, LAN config, backups, and launch scripts.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • +1 more from Saqlain-811

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 111 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If the active host is already standalone Codex, stop before any bridge command.

    line 12
  2. Very specific:

    Never recursively invoke codex-run.ts or launch the Codex CLI from inside Codex.

    line 13
  3. Distinctive:

    All subcommands are called via:

    line 25
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not add "ask before X" language for reversible in-scope work.

    line 55
  5. Very specific:

    After exec returns, ALWAYS review Codex's diff before trusting it:

    line 57
  6. Distinctive:

    Model routing: no model is pinned. Every subcommand runs on Codex's own configured default, so a newer Codex CLI brings newer models.

    line 97
  7. Distinctive:

    If the bridge is unavailable (the script is missing, Codex is not installed or not logged in, or it is rate-limited), do the delegated task …

    line 117

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 111 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Codex Bridge

Standalone Codex

If the active host is already standalone Codex, stop before any bridge command. Never recursively invoke codex-run.ts or launch the Codex CLI from inside Codex; the script refuses when it detects a Codex session. Do the requested task locally with native tools. When the user asks for an independent review, spawn claude-verifier (a Claude model through the read-only claude-run.ts bridge) or a fresh native reviewer; do not spawn codex-verifier.

Everything below is the Claude-only bridge workflow.

Claude-only bridge

Invoke the OpenAI Codex CLI from inside a Claude session. Three subcommands map to three distinct use cases.

All subcommands are called via:

bun "$HOME/.claude/src/scripts/codex-run.ts" <subcommand> [args]

Subcommands

exec -- delegate mechanical or bulk work

bun "$HOME/.claude/src/scripts/codex-run.ts" exec "the full task description"

Runs Codex in a workspace-write sandbox. Use this when a task is:

  • Mechanical (repetitive edits, file scaffolding, boilerplate generation)
  • Bulk (touching many files at once where Claude's serial context would be slow)
  • Parallelizable with Claude's own work (start Codex on one half while Claude handles the other)

Quota routing: Codex is metered by messages per ~5-hour window, not by tokens. Hand it one big complete task, not a sequence of small steps. A single exec call for a whole feature costs the same quota as one exec call for a single file.

Write the task as an outcome, not a recipe. The script wraps every exec task in a completion contract (run the repo's local checks, fix what the change broke, do not stop after a first implementation, leave changes uncommitted, report what was verified). Codex returns that report as JSON, and the script prints ready: yes|no after checking it against the working tree; read that line before reviewing the diff. Pass --expected <minutes> to have a silent worker killed and reported as stalled at 3x that. GPT-6 Astra stops early when done is undefined and over-follows step lists, so the task itself must say:

  • the end state that means done (which behavior holds, which files or surfaces are covered);
  • where to stop exploring, if the task is open-ended;
  • any decision Codex must bring back instead of making (leave everything else to its judgment).

Do not add "ask before X" language for reversible in-scope work; the sandbox already bounds the blast radius, and Astra reads such language as a reason to stop.

After exec returns, ALWAYS review Codex's diff before trusting it:

git diff

Then run the proof gate:

bun run proof

review -- independent cross-model diff review

bun "$HOME/.claude/src/scripts/codex-run.ts" review

Runs in a read-only sandbox. The prompt names the diff under review and the review contract (behavior and risk only, findings by HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW with file, line range, and fix). Codex decides how to inspect the repository.

Use this after you have finished a diff and want a second opinion from a different model family. Codex and Claude have different blind spots — cross-model review catches what Opus self-review misses. This is the primary reason to prefer review over asking Claude to review its own output.

Scope presets — mirrors Codex's own /review presets (base-branch / uncommitted / commit / custom). Default with no flags is the uncommitted working-tree diff. Flags are mutually exclusive:

# Default: review the current uncommitted diff (git diff + git diff --cached)
bun "$HOME/.claude/src/scripts/codex-run.ts" review

# Only the staged diff
bun "$HOME/.claude/src/scripts/codex-run.ts" review --staged

# Diff against a base branch (merge-base...HEAD)
bun "$HOME/.claude/src/scripts/codex-run.ts" review --base main

# A single commit
bun "$HOME/.claude/src/scripts/codex-run.ts" review --commit abc1234

Codex's fourth preset ("custom instructions") is covered by ask above rather than a review flag.

Model routing: no model is pinned. Every subcommand runs on Codex's own configured default, so a newer Codex CLI brings newer models. Pin one per call with --model <id> before the task text, or per session with CODEX_EXEC_MODEL, CODEX_REVIEW_MODEL, CODEX_ASK_MODEL.

bun "$HOME/.claude/src/scripts/codex-run.ts" review --model <id> --base main
bun "$HOME/.claude/src/scripts/codex-run.ts" exec --model <id> "..."

ask -- read-only second opinion

bun "$HOME/.claude/src/scripts/codex-run.ts" ask "your question here"

Runs in a read-only sandbox. Use for quick factual questions, architecture opinions, or anything where you want a fast external perspective without making any changes.


Quota and cost guidance

  • review and ask are read-only and cheap — use them freely as a cross-check; exec follows the quota routing above.
  • If the bridge is unavailable (the script is missing, Codex is not installed or not logged in, or it is rate-limited), do the delegated task yourself, Claude-only, without asking which fallback to use. Say once that Codex was unavailable. Do not block the session.
  • Routing policy comes from the quota-steer and codex-verify hooks (see "Claude and Codex routing" in ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md); when either injects a reminder, prefer exec/review here over spawning Claude subagents.

Availability states

The script handles all availability states gracefully. On failure it prints guidance to stderr and exits 1. Possible states:

  • not-installed -- install Codex CLI and run codex login
  • unauthenticated -- run codex login
  • no-access -- plan entitlement issue; try codex logout && codex login
  • rate-limited -- usage window exhausted; retry after the ~5-hour reset
  • unknown -- one-off error; safe to retry

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.