etf-screen
Skill9 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
ETF overview and analysis. Use when the user asks about an ETF ticker, wants to understand what an ETF holds, or wants a first look at an exchange-traded fund.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- etf-compareSkill
- etf-portfolioSkill
- etf-sectorSkill
- stock-analystSkill
- stock-balance-sheetSkill
- stock-earningsSkill
- stock-filingSkill
- stock-managementSkill
- stock-moatSkill
- stock-monitorSkill
- stock-portfolioSkill
- stock-red-flagsSkill
- stock-screenSkill
- stock-sectorSkill
- stock-thesisSkill
- stock-valuationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 6
Run a structured 1-page ETF screen covering:
- Distinctive: line 21
If top 10 > 50%: flag as concentrated, not diversified
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Run a structured 1-page ETF screen covering:
1. WHAT IT IS
- Full name, index tracked, index provider, fund issuer
- Strategy in 1 sentence: what does owning this ETF mean you're betting on?
- Inception date, AUM, average daily volume, expense ratio
2. WHAT YOU ACTUALLY OWN
- Top 10 holdings with % weight
- Sector breakdown (% of portfolio)
- Geographic breakdown if relevant
- Number of holdings total — how concentrated vs diversified is it really?
3. CONCENTRATION RISK
- Top 5 holdings as % of total portfolio
- If top 10 > 50%: flag as concentrated, not diversified
- Any single-stock dominance (>10% in one name) — name it explicitly
4. FACTOR TILT
- What factors does this ETF load on? (growth, value, momentum, quality, size, yield)
- What kind of market environment does it outperform / underperform?
- Beta vs S&P 500 (high/low/negative)
5. COST & EFFICIENCY
- Expense ratio vs cheapest alternative covering same exposure
- Tracking error vs benchmark (if available)
- Tax efficiency: does it distribute capital gains? (relevant for taxable accounts)
6. THE HONEST 1-LINE VERDICT One sentence: what is this ETF actually good for, and who should own it?
Flag any data older than 2 quarters. Note if the ETF is thinly traded (avg daily volume <$10M) — liquidity matters at exit.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

