agentleFS
daringanitchdaringanitch/claude-stock-analyst/skills/etf-portfolio/SKILL.md

etf-portfolio

Skill9 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Portfolio analysis for a mix of ETFs. Use when the user has multiple ETFs and wants to understand overlap, hidden concentration, factor exposure, or overall risk across the combined portfolio.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If any pair >60% overlap: flag as redundant — investor is paying two expense ratios for one position.

    line 28

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Analyze the ETF portfolio provided. The key insight ETF investors miss: owning multiple ETFs does not mean you're diversified — you may be tripling down on the same stocks without knowing it.

1. UNPACK THE HOLDINGS For each ETF, identify:

  • Top 10 holdings and weights
  • Sector breakdown
  • Factor tilt

2. HIDDEN CONCENTRATION

  • Which single stocks appear across multiple ETFs? List them with combined effective weight
  • Flag any stock where combined exposure across all ETFs exceeds 5% of the total portfolio
  • Example: owning QQQ + VGT + SOXX = NVDA appears in all three; effective weight may be 15%+ of portfolio

3. OVERLAP MATRIX Build a simple overlap table showing % holdings shared between each ETF pair:

ETF AETF BETF C
ETF A—X%X%
ETF BX%—X%
ETF CX%X%—

If any pair >60% overlap: flag as redundant — investor is paying two expense ratios for one position.

4. FACTOR EXPOSURE What is the net factor tilt of the combined portfolio?

  • Growth / Value / Momentum / Quality / Size / Yield
  • Is this intentional or accidental?

5. SECTOR CONCENTRATION Combined sector weights across all ETFs. What sectors are over/underweight vs a simple S&P 500 benchmark?

6. MACRO SENSITIVITY How does the combined portfolio behave in:

  • Rates +100bps
  • Recession
  • Dollar +10%
  • Tech selloff (>20% drawdown in mega-cap tech)

7. COST DRAG Weighted average expense ratio across the portfolio. If >0.20%, identify where the cost is coming from and whether a cheaper equivalent exists.

8. CONSOLIDATION RECOMMENDATIONS Which ETFs are redundant and can be eliminated? Which single ETF could replace two or more positions? What's missing entirely?

Output a risk heat map and 2–3 specific rebalancing recommendations with reasoning.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.