plan-tests
Skill288 starsChanged 5 days agoMITView on GitHub
Design a risk-scaled test architecture for an epic before implementation begins. Produces prioritized scenarios, test level distribution, and fixture plans based on TEA and bigpowers principles.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- grooownow/qa-pilottheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
- genkovich/sddtheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- igmarin/rails-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 30, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- genkovich/sdd★ 187same name
- igmarin/rails-agent-skills★ 26same name
- grooownow/qa-pilot★ 6same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository162 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- website/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .cursor/rules/align-grid.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/assess-impact.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/audit-code.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/audit-plan.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/build-epic.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/change-request.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/commit-message.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/compose-workflow.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/craft-skill.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/deepen-architecture.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/define-language.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/define-success.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/delegate-task.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/deploy.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/design-interface.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/develop-tdd.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/diagnose-root.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/diagnose-stall.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/dispatch-agents.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/edit-document.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/elaborate-spec.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/enforce-first.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/evolve-skill.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/execute-plan.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/extract-design.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/find-way.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/fix-bug.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/gate-trace.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/generate-allure-report.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/grill-me.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/grill-with-docs.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/guard-git.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/harden-vps.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/hook-commits.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/inspect-quality.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/investigate-bug.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kickoff-branch.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/maintain-wiki.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/map-codebase.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/migrate-spec.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/model-domain.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/orchestrate-project.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/organize-workspace.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/plan-refactor.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/plan-release.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/plan-tests.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/plan-work.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/publish-package.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/quick-fix.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/release-branch.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/request-review.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/research-first.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/reset-baseline.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/respond-review.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/run-benchmark.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/run-evals.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/run-planning.mdcCursor rule
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
Read specs/epics/eNN-*/ story list.
- Distinctive: line 18
Analyze Epic: Read sliced stories in the active epic capsule.
- Distinctive: line 26
DO NOT: write test code or production code during this skill.
- Distinctive: line 29
Default to pushing tests to the lowest possible level.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Plan Tests
Spine position: Between
slice-tasksandplan-workfor epics withrisk: P0|P1. Optional (can be waived instate.yaml) for P2/P3.
Bridges the gap between slicing and planning by systematically designing the test suite as a first-class system. Produces specs/tech-architecture/eNN-TEST_PLAN_LATEST.md.
Pre-flight
- Read
specs/epics/eNN-*/story list.
Core Workflow
- Analyze Epic: Read sliced stories in the active epic capsule.
- Risk Assessment: Map behaviors to P0–P3 risk tiers.
- Level Strategy: Classify each scenario (Unit, Integration, E2E).
- Fixture Design: Plan factories, network intercepts, mocks (see REFERENCE.md).
- NFR Plan: Define verifiable commands for Non-Functional Requirements. Skip if
--lite. - Publish: Generate
specs/tech-architecture/eNN-TEST_PLAN_LATEST.md.
Hard Gates & Guardrails
- DO NOT write test code or production code during this skill.
- Scenario ID format MUST be:
SC-eNNsYY-P{0|1|2|3}-NN. plan-workMUST reference these scenario IDs in its §17 Gherkin acceptance criteria.- Default to pushing tests to the lowest possible level.
Execution Modes
$bmad plan-tests: Standard execution.$bmad plan-tests --lite: Skips NFRs and complex fixture planning.
Verify
→ verify: test -f specs/tech-architecture/e32-TEST_PLAN_LATEST.md
Handoff
Gate: READY -> next: plan-work Writes: state.yaml handoff.next_skill = plan-work
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

