agentleFS
Sign inStart free
dandacompanydandacompany/dante-skills/humanize-korean/SKILL.md

humanize-korean

Skill14 starsChanged 4 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub

AI(ChatGPT·Claude·Gemini)가 쓴 한글 텍스트를 사람이 쓴 글처럼 윤문한다. 번역투·영어 인용 과다·기계적 병렬·관용구·피동 남용·접속사 남발·리듬 균일·이모지/불릿 과다 등 10대 카테고리 40+ AI 티 패턴을 탐지·분류해 내용은 한 글자도 건드리지 않고 문체·리듬·표현만 자연스럽게 재작성한다. 트리거 — "AI 티 없애줘", "AI 윤문", "ChatGPT 티 제거", "번역투 고쳐", "사람이 쓴 것처럼", "humanize Korean". 단순 맞춤법 교정·번역·내용 추가는 대상 아님.

8 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use humanize-redo and humanize.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • dawn840705Skill

    humanize-redo

    가장 최근 윤문 결과를 2차로 다시 다듬는다 — 특정 카테고리·문단·강도 조정도 가능. humanize-korean 의 윤문 콜을 기존 run_id 에 재실행해 잔존 finding 을 처리한다. 트리거 — "$humanize-redo". **명시적 슬래시 호출 전용** — 자연어 후속 요청은 `humanize-korean` 오케스트레이터가 받는다.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • eherrerosjSkill

    humanize

    Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive 'Signs of AI writing' guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases. Triggers on: 'humanize', 'make this sound human', 'remove AI writing', 'de-AI', 'sound more natural', 'less robotic', 'too AI-sounding', or when reviewing text that reads like AI output.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Create a free account to mount

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free