agentleFS
dalrootdalroot/agentic-seo/skills/seo/programmatic-seo/SKILL.md

programmatic-seo

Skill23 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

When the user wants to create SEO pages at scale using templates and data—including AI-assisted, grounded copy for per-URL differentiation (vs rigid mail-merge templates). Also use when the user mentions "programmatic SEO," "programmatic SEO pages," "template pages," "scale content," "location pages," "city pages," "comparison pages at scale," "X vs Y pages," "integration pages," "pages from data," "automated landing pages," or "programmatic landing pages." Uses a playbook matrix aligned to skills under skills/pages. For user-facing template galleries or marketplaces (browse → use), use template-page-generator.

109 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use popups, paywalls and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • CesarjoquinSkill

    popups

    When the user wants to create or optimize popups, modals, overlays, slide-ins, or banners for conversion purposes. Also use when the user mentions "exit intent," "popup conversions," "modal optimization," "lead capture popup," "email popup," "announcement banner," "overlay," "collect emails with a popup," "exit popup," "scroll trigger," "sticky bar," or "notification bar." Use this for any overlay or interrupt-style conversion element. For forms outside of popups, see cro. For general page conversion optimization, see cro.

    Also in 16 projects that use this

  • CesarjoquinSkill

    paywalls

    When the user wants to create or optimize in-app paywalls, upgrade screens, upsell modals, or feature gates. Also use when the user mentions "paywall," "upgrade screen," "upgrade modal," "upsell," "feature gate," "convert free to paid," "freemium conversion," "trial expiration screen," "limit reached screen," "plan upgrade prompt," "in-app pricing," "free users won't upgrade," "trial to paid conversion," or "how do I get users to pay." Use this for any in-product moment where you're asking users to upgrade. Distinct from public pricing pages (see cro) — this focuses on in-product upgrade moments where the user has already experienced value. For pricing decisions, see pricing.

    Also in 16 projects that use this

  • silvainfmSkill

    popup-cro

    When the user wants to create or optimize popups, modals, overlays, slide-ins, or banners for conversion purposes. Also use when the user mentions "exit intent," "popup conversions," "modal optimization," "lead capture popup," "email popup," "announcement banner," or "overlay." For forms outside of popups, see form-cro. For general page conversion optimization, see page-cro.

    Also in 26 projects that use this

  • ukunal91appSkill

    revops

    When the user wants help with revenue operations, lead lifecycle management, or marketing-to-sales handoff processes. Also use when the user mentions 'RevOps,' 'revenue operations,' 'lead scoring,' 'lead routing,' 'MQL,' 'SQL,' 'pipeline stages,' 'deal desk,' 'CRM automation,' 'marketing-to-sales handoff,' 'data hygiene,' 'leads aren't getting to sales,' 'pipeline management,' 'lead qualification,' or 'when should marketing hand off to sales.' Use this for anything involving the systems and processes that connect marketing to revenue. For cold outreach emails, see cold-email. For email drip campaigns, see email-sequence. For pricing decisions, see pricing-strategy.

    Also in 33 projects that use this

  • ukunal91appSkill

    community-marketing

    Build and leverage online communities to drive product growth and brand loyalty. Use when the user wants to create a community strategy, grow a Discord or Slack community, manage a forum or subreddit, build brand advocates, increase word-of-mouth, drive community-led growth, engage users post-signup, or turn customers into evangelists. Trigger phrases: "build a community," "community strategy," "Discord community," "Slack community," "community-led growth," "brand advocates," "user community," "forum strategy," "community engagement," "grow our community," "ambassador program," "community flywheel.

    Also in 22 projects that use this

  • silvainfmSkill

    signup-flow-cro

    When the user wants to optimize signup, registration, account creation, or trial activation flows. Also use when the user mentions "signup conversions," "registration friction," "signup form optimization," "free trial signup," "reduce signup dropoff," or "account creation flow." For post-signup onboarding, see onboarding-cro. For lead capture forms (not account creation), see form-cro.

    Also in 26 projects that use this

  • +6 more from Cesarjoquin

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 106 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Project context: If .claude/project-context.md or .cursor/project-context.md exists, read product/ICP sections before proposing playbooks …

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    AI here: Use models to turn structured aggregates into prose (intro paragraphs, “what this means for [segment]”)—input must be verified …

    line 118
  3. Distinctive:

    AI here: Use models to structure messy public text into tables, outline sections, suggest internal links—then fact-check names, numbers, …

    line 145
  4. Distinctive:

    If programmatic pages are already published and feel interchangeable — shared closing sentences, identical value propositions across URLs, …

    line 237
  5. Distinctive:

    Add structural-variety requirements to AI generation prompts (vary section endings, forbid repeated closing formulas).

    line 261

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 106 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

SEO: Programmatic SEO

Guides programmatic SEO—creating large numbers of SEO-optimized pages automatically using templates and structured data, rather than writing each page manually. Classic “mail merge” pSEO (one rigid template + swapped variables) often produced low differentiation and thin-feeling URLs. With AI used responsibly on top of the same data spine, you can scale per-URL customization—intent-aligned copy, section depth, FAQs, tone, localization—while still following evidence blocks, data tiers, and QA (see Data strength hierarchy and AI-assisted generation below).

When invoking: On first use, if helpful, open with 1–2 sentences on what this skill covers and why it matters, then provide the main output. On subsequent use or when the user asks to skip, go directly to the main output.

Project context: If .claude/project-context.md or .cursor/project-context.md exists, read product/ICP sections before proposing playbooks or page types.

Definition

Programmatic SEO = Building a single template and populating it with data from a database, API, or spreadsheet to generate hundreds or thousands of unique pages. Each page targets a long-tail keyword (e.g., "best SEO tool in [city]," "[App A] + [App B] integration").

Key differences from traditional SEO: Technical (SEOs + engineers); long-tail focus; data-driven (data quality = success); automation; built for scale.

Classic limits vs AI-enhanced differentiation

EraWhat breaksWhat helps
Rigid pSEOOne template, minimal variance → similar titles/bodies, weak E-E-A-T, “obvious mail merge”Still needs unique evidence per URL and selective indexation
AI-enhanced pSEOSame structured rows (facts, SKUs, metrics) drive the page, but models add per-URL narrative: intros, FAQ depth, persona angles, localization, internal-link suggestions—higher differentiation at scaleFacts stay in your data layer; AI shapes phrasing and structure, not invented numbers—see AI-assisted generation

Best-practice stance: AI is an accelerator and customizer, not a substitute for data defensibility (Tiers 1–5) or technical SEO (URLs, schema, CWV). Used well, it aligns with quality over quantity: fewer thin URLs, more distinct useful pages.

Three-Part Framework

ComponentRole
TemplatesReusable page structures: layout, headings, internal links, content blocks; conditional logic for empty fields
DataStructured information: locations, products, prices, features—must be accurate, complete, and add genuine value
AutomationSystems connecting data to templates; pages generated dynamically or published in bulk
AI layer (optional)On grounded inputs (row JSON + rules), generates varied copy, FAQ expansions, and section emphasis per URL—reduces “same template” fatigue while staying auditable

Page Playbook Matrix (skills/pages)

Page types in this library live under pages/{brand|content|legal|marketing|utility}/. Use the matrix below to map search pattern → playbook → which *-page-generator skill to open for structure, copy, and schema—not every folder is a good fit for mass-generated URLs.

PlaybookExample intent / keyword patternPage skill (name)Path (reference)
Alternatives / comparisons"[Competitor] alternatives", "X vs Y"alternatives-page-generatorpages/marketing/alternatives
Integrations"[Product A] [Product B] integration"integrations-page-generatorpages/marketing/integrations
Category / catalogFaceted listings, product gridscategory-page-generator, products-page-generatorpages/marketing/category-pages, products
Glossary / definitions"what is [term]", term landingsglossary-page-generatorpages/content/glossary
FAQ / Q&AQuestion banks, PAA-style pagesfaq-page-generatorpages/content/faq
How-to / proceduresStep libraries, "[how to] [task]" blocks in templateshowto-section-generatorcomponents/content/howto-section
Comparison matrix (blocks)Feature/criteria grids, "vs" cells from data feedcomparison-table-generatorcomponents/content/comparison-table
Tools & lead magnets"free [x] tool/calculator"tools-page-generatorpages/content/tools
Template galleryBrowse → detail (your templates)template-page-generatorpages/content/template-page
Resource hubGuides, hubs, download centersresources-page-generatorpages/content/resources
Use cases / solutions"for [role]", "by industry"use-cases-page-generator, solutions-page-generatorpages/marketing/use-cases, solutions
Migration / switching"migrate from [X]"migration-page-generatorpages/marketing/migration
Campaign landingPaid/segment LPslanding-page-generatorpages/marketing/landing-page
Blog / articleLong-tail articles at scaleblog-page-generator, article-page-generatorpages/content/blog, article
Docs / features / APIScalable doc sections, feature landings, /api marketingdocs-page-generator, features-page-generator, api-page-generatorpages/content/docs, features, api
Social proofLogos, case studies, galleriespress-coverage-page-generator, customer-stories-page-generator, showcase-page-generatorpages/marketing/press-coverage, customer-stories, showcase
Programs & offersStartups/education, contests, downloads, affiliate, media kitstartups-page-generator, contest-page-generator, download-page-generator, affiliate-page-generator, media-kit-page-generatorpages/marketing/*
Pricing / servicesPlans, offerings (use sparingly for pSEO)pricing-page-generator, services-page-generatorpages/marketing/pricing, services

Usually not mass programmatic (single primary URL or compliance-heavy): pages/brand/* (home, about, contact), pages/legal/*, most pages/utility/* (404, status, signup-login, etc.)—treat as one-off or policy-driven, not template×data scale.

Choosing a Playbook

If you have…Lean toward…Open first…
Competitor list + positioningAlternatives / comparisonsalternatives-page-generator
Integration directory (your + partners')Integrations matrixintegrations-page-generator
Product catalog or SKUsCategory / product gridscategory-page-generator, products-page-generator
Term / definition databaseGlossaryglossary-page-generator
Support tickets / PAA mined questionsFAQ scalefaq-page-generator
How-to step banks / procedure templatesHowTo sections in scaled pageshowto-section-generator
Competitor/feature matrix from dataComparison table blocks in scaled pagescomparison-table-generator (+ alternatives-page-generator for URL intent)
Lead magnets, calculatorsTools hub + per-tooltools-page-generator
Your own templates (exports, gallery items)Template marketplacetemplate-page-generator
ICP × industry matrixUse cases / solutionsuse-cases-page-generator, solutions-page-generator
Import paths from competitorsMigrationmigration-page-generator
Campaign or geo LPsLanding pageslanding-page-generator
Long-form SEO articlesBlog index + single postblog-page-generator, article-page-generator

Template Structure (Recommended)

SectionPurpose
IntroIntroduction; matches user intent
Evidence blockData-driven content unique to each page (tables, lists, verified stats); differentiates from thin content
DecisionComparison, recommendation, or next steps
FAQFrequently asked questions
CTACall-to-action

Evidence block = Real, structured data per page (business listings, pricing, reviews, verified stats). Ensures each page delivers genuine value, not recycled boilerplate with swapped variables.

Data strength hierarchy (defensibility)

Strongest programmatic pages are fueled by what only your product (or your customers inside your product) can produce—especially templates, exports, and generated artifacts. Third-party or scraped lists alone are the weakest foundation.

TierSourceExamplesRelative risk
1 — Product-generatedAssets created or rendered by your product: page/layout templates, email/Notion/code templates, export packs, generated previews, branded snippets, “built with [Product]” examplesTemplate gallery rows tied to real .json / CMS fields; screenshots of exports; unique preview URLsLowest when each URL shows distinct generated output
2 — Product-derivedTelemetry and in-product data you own: aggregates, cohorts, benchmarks, feature adoption“Teams in [industry] median time-to-value” from your warehouse (aggregated)Low if aggregated / anonymized and policy-compliant
3 — UGC / customerReviews, submissions, showcase items, moderated community contentShowcase grid; verified quotesMedium—needs moderation + consent
4 — Licensed / partnerExclusive feeds, co-marketing datasetsPartner pricing tiers; licensed industry statsMedium—contract and citation discipline
5 — Public / scrapedOpen web, directories, generic enrichmentName/address fills; commodity factsHighest—needs editorial layer, fact-checking, and a real Evidence block

Why Tier 1 (templates & generated content) wins: Pages built from your template system carry proprietary structure, variables, and brand-safe blocks—harder for competitors to copy verbatim and easier to prove uniqueness (embeds, downloads, IDs). Pair with template-page-generator when the UX is “browse gallery → use template.”

Tier 2 — Product-derived (practical)

What it isWhat to watch
Metrics from your backend, data warehouse, or support/CRM exports: activation rates by segment, integration popularity, error budgets, time-to-value—not generic “industry reports.”Privacy & ToS: Minimum cell sizes; no individual identification; document what was aggregated and over what window.
Good fit when you can show “only we could know this because it runs in our product.”Stale data hurts trust: pipeline jobs, “as of [date]” labels, automated invalidation.

AI here: Use models to turn structured aggregates into prose (intro paragraphs, “what this means for [segment]”)—input must be verified numbers/tables from your pipeline, not free-form invention. Keep a machine-readable table or JSON on-page or in appendix so claims stay auditable.

Tier 3 — UGC / customer (practical)

What it isWhat to watch
Quotes, reviews, showcase submissions, community templates—per-user artifacts with consent.Moderation: spam, PII, competitor attacks; consent for name/logo use; schema (Review, CreativeWork) only when accurate.
Strong when combined with Tier 1 (e.g. “customer-built template” gallery).Volume without quality → thin pages; cap or score submissions.

AI here: Summarize long reviews into bullets; generate draft alt text for images; cluster submissions into topic pages—always human approve before publish. Do not fabricate testimonials.

Tier 4 — Licensed / partner (practical)

What it isWhat to watch
Partner price lists, co-marketed reports, API-fed allowed fields (logos, SKUs).Contract scope: Which fields can appear on which URLs; attribution line; DMCA / trademark on logos.
Often one feed → many URLs; uniqueness must come from your framing, comparison logic, or calculator—not the raw feed alone.Refresh cadence tied to partner SLAs.

AI here: Draft comparison copy and FAQs from a fixed attribute table (license + partner rules); never invent SKUs or prices—pull from feed, let AI phrase and shorten.

Tier 5 — Public / scraped (practical)

What it isWhat to watch
Open data, directories, Wikipedia-style facts, enrichment of public entities.Highest duplicate/thin risk: everyone has the same facts; you must add synthesis, editorial angle, or a unique tool (calculator, filter) on top.
Entity SEO and citations matter: link to authoritative sources; date-stamp volatile facts.Plan for pruning or noindex on low-traffic thin URLs.

AI here: Use models to structure messy public text into tables, outline sections, suggest internal links—then fact-check names, numbers, and dates. Do not use AI to invent statistics or citations; treat output as draft until verified.

AI-assisted generation (cross-tier)

Why AI fits modern pSEO: Early programmatic SEO earned a bad reputation because templates were frozen and copy was interchangeable—little real differentiation per query. LLMs, when grounded on each row’s facts and your brand rules, make it practical to customize headlines, intros, FAQs, and “why this page matters” per URL without hand-writing thousands of pages. That moves execution closer to best practices (intent match, helpful content, unique value) at scale, provided you do not let the model invent data.

PrincipleWhy
Ground AI in structured inputsPass JSON/CSV rows (tier, source URL, metrics) into prompts; forbid hallucinated numbers in system prompts.
Separate “facts” from “phrasing”Data layer = source of truth; AI = tone, shortening, localization, FAQs, per-segment emphasis—never the other way around.
Vary structure, not only adjectivesAsk for different section order, FAQ count, or “beginner vs power user” angles by intent flags in the row—reduces template sameness.
Human or automated QASpot-check high-traffic URLs; block publish if required fields empty or citation missing.
Disclose when usefule.g. “Intro generated with AI; figures from [internal report, Q3 2025].” Builds trust and matches policy trends.

When AI generation is a strong lever: Tiers 2–5—where raw material is already tabular or repetitive but needs readable, differentiated copy at scale. Tier 1 still benefits from AI (drafts from export JSON), but the differentiator remains the product artifact itself.

Operational requirements (all tiers)

RequirementPractice
ProvenanceLog data sources; track origin per field
Freshness rulese.g., ratings every 90 days, prices every 30 days, template version bumps when layouts change
Prefer 1–2 over 5Fill evidence with product-generated or product-derived data before reaching for public scraping
AI governanceStructured inputs only; no unverified numbers; moderation on UGC; optional disclosure
Clean & mergeDeduplicate keys; drop rows that produce duplicate intents

Ideal Use Cases

For which page-generator skill to use, see Page Playbook Matrix above. Generic patterns:

Use caseExample
Location-specific pages"Plumber in [city]," "Best restaurants in [neighborhood]" with real local data
Product comparison"[Product A] vs [Product B]" with structured specs
Alternatives pages"[Competitor] alternatives" at scale; 50+ competitors; see alternatives-page-generator
Software integration"[App A] + [App B]" integration pages (e.g., Zapier 50K+ pages)
Free tools"[X] checker," "[Y] calculator," "[Z] generator" — standalone tool pages; toolkit hub; same ICP as main product; lead gen
Travel / destinationCity + attraction combinations with reviews, photos
E-commerceCategory pages, product variations (size, color, material)
FAQ / Q&APages powered by user question databases
Salary / pricingComparison pages with structured data

Avoid when: Site structure is weak; page differences are superficial (city/name swaps only); content requires original expertise or UGC participation.

Real-World Examples

Examples are illustrative; no endorsement implied.

CompanyScalePattern
Zapier50,000+ pages"[App A] + [App B]" integration
Airbnb—Location search; destination × property
Review platforms—User reviews + automated comparison pages
Travel sites—Destination, hotel, flight, activity pages
NomadList2,000+ city pagesCost-of-living, internet speed (dynamic data)
Semrush, Ahrefs50+ free toolsSEO checker, keyword tool, backlink checker; toolkit hub + per-tool pages

Content Requirements

RequirementPurpose
300+ words per pageAvoid thin content penalties
Unique, verifiable dataEach page must add meaningful page-specific content beyond simple data swaps
Evidence blockTables, lists, examples with real numbers/attributes on every page
Semantic HTMLProper structure; conditional logic to avoid empty or repetitive sections
Internal linkingLink related programmatic pages; compounds traffic and indexation

Technical Considerations

TopicPractice
Subfolder vs subdomainPrefer subfolders (yoursite.com/integration/slack-notion/) over subdomains (integrations.yoursite.com/...) so authority consolidates on the primary domain; see url-structure, domain-architecture if restructuring
Selective indexationDon't index all pages; use noindex rules for low-value pages
Sitemap segmentationBy country, language, division; manage crawl budget
URL structureDescriptive URLs; clean hierarchy; see url-structure
SchemaJSON-LD: Product, Place, FAQ, ItemList per page type
PerformanceCaching, static generation; Core Web Vitals

Critical Pitfalls

PitfallConsequence
Thin contentMinimal info beyond keyword; generic copy; placeholder sections → penalties
Duplicate pagesSame content with only data swaps → thin content penalties
Index bloatGenerating pages that should never be indexable → crawl budget waste
Large dumpsPublishing many similar pages at once → spam signals
Filter URLsUsing filters instead of unique URLs/titles → cannibalization

Pages with only a title, one paragraph, and swapped city names will not rank and may incur Google penalties.

Remediating Already-Built Homogenized Pages

If programmatic pages are already published and feel interchangeable — shared closing sentences, identical value propositions across URLs, cloned section endings — fix the content before it triggers quality signals.

Diagnostic approach

Run regex scans across rendered or source files to surface shared sentence tails and repeated paragraph structures. Look for patterns that appear in more than 30% of same-category pages. Common telltales: every tool page ending with "X is the ideal choice for Y," every category page sharing the same technology summary, every location page using identical FAQ tails.

Scan at three scopes: within a single page (do its sections repeat the same closing formula?), within a category (do all video tool pages share a template?), and across categories (is the same value statement on every page site-wide?).

Prioritize fixes into three levels

PriorityWhat it isAction
P0 — EliminatePure template filler with no information value; every page says the same thingRewrite each page independently with page-specific detail
P1 — RewriteCore information is correct but delivery is formulaic (e.g., "different tools use different architectures" — true but generic)Prepare 8–15 semantic variants and cycle through them so adjacent pages differ
P2 — Reduce densityNormal vocabulary that appears too frequently (e.g., "seamless" on 80% of pages)Replace ~30–40% of instances, not all — normal words are fine at moderate frequency

Execute in rounds

Fix P0 patterns first, one category at a time. After each round, re-scan to confirm patterns are cleared and no new ones appeared. A common trap: replacing one template with another by applying the same fix uniformly. Distribute rewrites so pages processed in sequence get different treatments.

For single-page internal duplicates — where all use cases or tool descriptions within one file share identical closing sentences — use functional endings instead of evaluative ones. A functional ending describes what bottleneck the entry solves in practice; an evaluative ending just declares it's a good choice.

Prevention in the pipeline

Add structural-variety requirements to AI generation prompts (vary section endings, forbid repeated closing formulas). Batch-generate pages from different categories together rather than all from one category at once. Run N-gram overlap checks across same-category pages before publishing.

Step-by-Step Workflow

  1. Research — Niche, intent; include low-volume keywords; SEO tools, question databases
  2. Collect data — Provenance log, freshness rules; first-party/licensed; define template fields
  3. Choose stack — Next.js + DB, Webflow CMS, WordPress, headless; API + template reuse
  4. Design template — Intro, Evidence, Decision, FAQ, CTA; schema; conditional logic
  5. Build database — Map fields to template slots; hide empties
  6. Generate pages — Descriptive URLs; optimize performance
  7. Deploy & monitor — Sitemaps; indexation, rankings, CTR, bounce, conversions
  8. Optimize — Prune weak pages; refresh data; A/B test layout, CTA

Best Practices

PracticePurpose
Quality over scaleEach page must provide genuinely unique, verifiable value
Differentiation over clonePrefer AI-grounded copy variance + evidence blocks over one static paragraph with {city} swaps
Launch in batchesSmall batches you can measure; avoid large dumps
Strong IAInternal links to related guides/categories
Visual elementsTables, maps, comparisons where relevant
Match intentAvoid generic template text; precise user intent

Timeline & Expectations

  • Typical time to ranking: ~6 months
  • Reported gains: 40%+ traffic increases from well-designed topic clusters
  • AI search: Structured, data-rich content performs better in AI Overviews and citation layers

Output Format

  • Template design (Intro, Evidence, Decision, FAQ, CTA; required data fields)
  • Data requirements (provenance, freshness, accuracy)
  • Internal linking (hub-and-spoke, related pages)
  • Indexation strategy (selective indexation, sitemap segmentation)
  • Checklist for audit

Related Skills

  • template-page-generator: Template structure; aggregation (gallery) + detail pages; Tier 1 product-generated template URLs
  • landing-page-generator: Conversion-focused programmatic pages; LP structure for campaign CTA
  • tools-page-generator: Free tools pages; toolkit hub; programmatic tool pages; lead gen
  • alternatives-page-generator: Alternatives/comparison pages at scale; competitor brand traffic
  • category-page-generator, products-page-generator: Category / catalog grids
  • glossary-page-generator, faq-page-generator, howto-section-generator, comparison-table-generator, resources-page-generator: Definitions, Q&A banks, HowTo step blocks, comparison matrices, content hubs
  • use-cases-page-generator, solutions-page-generator, migration-page-generator: ICP/industry matrix, migration SEO
  • integrations-page-generator: Integration pair pages at scale
  • blog-page-generator, article-page-generator, docs-page-generator, features-page-generator, api-page-generator: Long-form and product surface scale
  • press-coverage-page-generator, customer-stories-page-generator, showcase-page-generator: Proof at scale
  • startups-page-generator, contest-page-generator, download-page-generator, affiliate-page-generator, media-kit-page-generator, pricing-page-generator, services-page-generator: Programs and offers (use selectively for pSEO)
  • content-strategy: Content clusters, pillar pages; programmatic pages as cluster nodes
  • website-structure: Site IA before scaling URL sets
  • url-structure, domain-architecture: Paths, subfolder strategy
  • schema-markup: Structured data (Product, Place, FAQ, ItemList)
  • internal-links: Linking programmatic pages
  • xml-sitemap: Sitemap segmentation for large programmatic sites
  • canonical-tag: Duplicate/thin content handling
  • seo-strategy, seo-audit: Roadmap and post-launch audits

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.