dora-report
Skill2 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub
Generate monthly DORA and agentic metrics reports. Use this skill when the user asks for a DORA report, monthly metrics, or a monthly audit. Not for security-code-auditor, readme-best-practices.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- d-oit/rust-2026-templatetheir own version, first seen Jun 16, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- d-oit/rust-2026-template★ 15same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository63 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .agents/skills/avoid-ai-writing/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .agents/skills/do-web-doc-resolver/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .agents/skills/skill-evaluator/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- scripts/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms-full.txtllms.txt
- llms.txtllms.txt
- accessibility-auditorSkill
- agent-browserSkill
- agentic-abstentionSkill
- agents-mdSkill
- api-design-firstSkill
- architecture-diagramSkill
- avoid-ai-writingSkill
- cicd-pipelineSkill
- cloudflare-worker-apiSkill
- codacySkill
- codeberg-apiSkill
- code-review-assistantSkill
- css-render-performanceSkill
- database-devopsSkill
- debuggerSkill
- delegateSkill
- dependency-upgradesSkill
- dist-channel-selectionSkill
- docs-hookSkill
- document-rendering-and-locatorsSkill
- dogfoodSkill
- do-web-doc-resolverSkill
- durable-objectsSkill
- eu-ai-act-complianceSkill
- git-github-workflowSkill
- goap-agentSkill
- implementerSkill
- intent-classifierSkill
- iterative-refinementSkill
- jules-delegatorSkill
- learnSkill
- lifecycle-managementSkill
- local-context-sanitizationSkill
- memory-contextSkill
- migration-refactoringSkill
- nested-build-isolationSkill
- privacy-firstSkill
- progressive-deliverySkill
- pwa-offline-syncSkill
- reader-ui-uxSkill
- readme-best-practicesSkill
- secrets-managementSkill
- secure-invite-and-accessSkill
- security-code-auditorSkill
- shell-script-qualitySkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skill-evaluatorSkill
- static-analysisSkill
- testing-strategySkill
- test-runnerSkill
- triz-solverSkill
- turso-dbSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 36
Create or append to agents-docs/dora-reports/YYYY-MM.md.
- Distinctive: line 37
Use standardized tables and charts (Mermaid where appropriate).
- Very specific: line 45
Run the automation script: python3 .agents/skills/dora-report/scripts/generate_report.py
- Very specific: line 46
Verify the output in agents-docs/dora-reports/YYYY-MM.md: every value must trace to git history, gh, or metrics logs — never placeholders.
- Distinctive: line 49
Add any qualitative analysis or TRIZ-based innovation opportunities to the generated file.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
DORA Report
Generate and maintain DORA (DevOps Research and Assessment) metrics and agentic performance metrics to track project velocity, stability, and agent efficiency.
When to Use
Activate when:
- Monthly reporting is required (e.g., at the end of a calendar month).
- The user requests a performance audit or "DORA report".
- Analyzing the impact of new tools or workflows on delivery speed and quality.
Instructions
- Calculate DORA Metrics:
- Deployment Frequency: How often code is successfully released to production (or merged to
mainin this template context). - Lead Time for Changes: The amount of time it takes a commit to get into production.
- Change Failure Rate: The percentage of deployments causing a failure in production (e.g., requiring a hotfix or revert).
- Time to Restore Service: How long it takes to recover from a failure in production.
- Deployment Frequency: How often code is successfully released to production (or merged to
- Calculate Agentic Metrics:
- Tasks Completed: Total number of GOAP goals or atomic tasks finalized.
- Skill Invocations: Frequency and distribution of skill usage.
- Token Usage Trends: Efficiency of context usage over time.
- Self-Fix Success Rate: Ratio of auto-fixed CI failures vs. those requiring human intervention.
- Generate Report:
- Create or append to
agents-docs/dora-reports/YYYY-MM.md. - Use standardized tables and charts (Mermaid where appropriate).
- Compare current metrics against the previous month's baseline.
- Create or append to
- Identify Bottlenecks:
- Based on metrics, suggest one "Innovation Opportunity" using TRIZ principles to improve a lagging metric.
Instructions
- Run the automation script:
python3 .agents/skills/dora-report/scripts/generate_report.py - Verify the output in
agents-docs/dora-reports/YYYY-MM.md: every value must trace to git history,gh, or metrics logs — never placeholders. Hand-written Analyst Notes are preserved across regenerations. - Add any qualitative analysis or TRIZ-based innovation opportunities to the generated file.
See Also
learn— Extract learnings into AGENTS.mdreadme-best-practices— README and documentation best practices
Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
| "Metrics are for managers, not agents" | Metrics provide the feedback loop for agentic self-improvement and workflow optimization. |
| "It's too hard to track lead time manually" | Agents can analyze git history and PR timestamps to automate this calculation. |
| "A monthly report is too frequent for a small repo" | Regular snapshots prevent technical debt from accumulating unnoticed. |
Red Flags
- Reporting "zero" for failures without verifying revert history or hotfix commits.
- Ignoring "agentic overhead" (e.g., extremely high token usage for simple tasks).
- Metrics that lack a time-bound context (e.g., "total tasks" instead of "tasks per week").
References
agents-docs/WORKFLOW.md- Standard delivery process to measure against.scripts/analyze-codebase.sh- Source for some raw performance data.
Voice & Context
- Default:
professional+blog - Reference:
voice-profilesskill for definitions and auto-detection.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

