dependency-upgrades
Skill2 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Perform routine, low-risk dependency version bumps and vulnerability-driven upgrades (patch/minor, or major with no source changes). Use when updating packages, action pins, pre-commit hooks, lockfiles, or base images — even if they just say "bump lodash" or "fix this CVE". Not for migration-refactoring (major bumps that force source changes, framework or language migrations).
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- reddygopalkrishna/developer-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- issue-orchestrator/issue-orchestratortheir own version, first seen Sep 6, 2026
- Bridev04/clauderailtheir own version, first seen May 17, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- issue-orchestrator/issue-orchestrator★ 10same name
- reddygopalkrishna/developer-agent-skills★ 8same name
- Bridev04/clauderail★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository63 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .agents/skills/avoid-ai-writing/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .agents/skills/do-web-doc-resolver/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .agents/skills/skill-evaluator/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- scripts/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms-full.txtllms.txt
- llms.txtllms.txt
- accessibility-auditorSkill
- agent-browserSkill
- agentic-abstentionSkill
- agents-mdSkill
- api-design-firstSkill
- architecture-diagramSkill
- avoid-ai-writingSkill
- cicd-pipelineSkill
- cloudflare-worker-apiSkill
- codacySkill
- codeberg-apiSkill
- code-review-assistantSkill
- css-render-performanceSkill
- database-devopsSkill
- debuggerSkill
- delegateSkill
- dist-channel-selectionSkill
- docs-hookSkill
- document-rendering-and-locatorsSkill
- dogfoodSkill
- dora-reportSkill
- do-web-doc-resolverSkill
- durable-objectsSkill
- eu-ai-act-complianceSkill
- git-github-workflowSkill
- goap-agentSkill
- implementerSkill
- intent-classifierSkill
- iterative-refinementSkill
- jules-delegatorSkill
- learnSkill
- lifecycle-managementSkill
- local-context-sanitizationSkill
- memory-contextSkill
- migration-refactoringSkill
- nested-build-isolationSkill
- privacy-firstSkill
- progressive-deliverySkill
- pwa-offline-syncSkill
- reader-ui-uxSkill
- readme-best-practicesSkill
- secrets-managementSkill
- secure-invite-and-accessSkill
- security-code-auditorSkill
- shell-script-qualitySkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skill-evaluatorSkill
- static-analysisSkill
- testing-strategySkill
- test-runnerSkill
- triz-solverSkill
- turso-dbSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 35
Never bump major versions together with unrelated changes.
- Distinctive: line 36
Never ignore a lockfile diff — read it.
- Distinctive: line 38
Never merge a security upgrade red (failing checks void the point).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Dependency Upgrades
Routine bumps and CVE-driven upgrades: one dependency per change, verified by CI, with a rollback path.
When to Use
- Bumping a package, action version, or base image
- Vulnerability alert (CVE, Dependabot, audit finding)
- Lockfile refresh or stale pins
Steps
- Scope one upgrade — one dependency per PR/branch so failures attribute cleanly. Group only provably-coupled pairs.
- Read the changelog — note breaking changes and migration notes before bumping, not after CI fails.
- Bump + lock — update the manifest and regenerate the lockfile with the project's canonical tool; never hand-edit lockfiles.
- Verify — full relevant test suite plus the quality gate; for security bumps, confirm the CVE is actually remediated (audit clean).
- Record rollback — pin the previous version in the PR body so revert is one commit.
Rules
- Never bump major versions together with unrelated changes.
- Never ignore a lockfile diff — read it; unexpected transitive churn is a signal, not noise.
- Never merge a security upgrade red (failing checks void the point).
- This repo's Dependabot groups all action minor/patch bumps into one PR
(
.github/dependabot.yml) and auto-merges via ADR-032 whenMAINTAINER_AUTOMATION=true; never let that bypass the verify step.
Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
| "It's just a patch bump, skip the tests" | Patch releases introduce regressions regularly; the suite is cheaper than the incident. |
| "Dependabot already tested it" | Bot CI covers the bot's matrix, not your integration paths; run your gates. |
Red Flags
- Major bump bundled with feature work
- Hand-edited lockfile
- CVE upgrade merged with failing checks
See Also
migration-refactoring— Framework and language migrationstest-runner— Execute tests after the bumpgit-github-workflow— Ship the upgrade end-to-end
References
evals/evals.json— upgrade cases incl. breaking-change negative
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

