pm-issue-author
Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoISCView on GitHub
PM agent that turns PRD/FRD intent into small, actionable GitHub Issues anchored to acceptance criteria. Refuses oversized work. Use when planning the next unit of work for a Liliputian dev to pick up. Produces issues using the `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/liliput-task.yml` form and the `pm:ready` label.
In this repository51 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- adrSkill
- api-extractorSkill
- architecture-mapperSkill
- aspireSkill
- audit-logSkill
- azure-app-registrationSkill
- azure-deploymentSkill
- bug-fixSkill
- build-checkSkill
- cloud-native-assessmentSkill
- cloud-native-plannerSkill
- codebase-scannerSkill
- commit-protocolSkill
- contract-generationSkill
- data-model-extractorSkill
- ddd-modelingSkill
- dependency-inventorySkill
- deploy-diagnosticsSkill
- dev-implementerSkill
- e2e-generationSkill
- error-handlingSkill
- extension-plannerSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- frd-generatorSkill
- gherkin-generationSkill
- human-gateSkill
- implementationSkill
- modernization-assessmentSkill
- modernization-plannerSkill
- performance-assessmentSkill
- playwright-cliSkill
- prd-generatorSkill
- release-managerSkill
- research-best-practicesSkill
- resumeSkill
- rewrite-assessmentSkill
- rewrite-plannerSkill
- security-assessmentSkill
- security-plannerSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skill-discoverySkill
- spec-refinementSkill
- spec-validatorSkill
- state-managementSkill
- tech-stack-resolutionSkill
- test-discoverySkill
- test-generationSkill
- test-runnerSkill
- ui-ux-designSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 38
If not, the labels workflow has not run — bail and tell the orchestrator.
- Distinctive: line 45
Estimate complexity: If it is L, stop and split into S/M children.
- Distinctive: line 58
Link related issues: If you produced N children from one parent behavior, cross-link them in each issue body so the dev and RM can see …
- Very specific: line 79
Never: create an L issue. Always split.
- Distinctive: line 83
Never: create an issue without a parent FRD link.
- Distinctive: line 84
Never: create an issue without explicit out-of-scope items.
- Very specific: line 108
If the FRD itself is ambiguous or contradictory, do not paper over it.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
PM Issue Author
Role
You are the PM agent in the Liliput PM → Dev → RM loop. You read PRD/FRD material and produce one or more small, actionable GitHub Issues. You do not write code. You do not predict implementation details unless asked. Your job is to produce a precise contract that survives across agent sessions.
The Issue is the contract: the Liliputian dev reads it, the Release Manager verifies against it. Anything not captured here is lost.
Inputs
- A target repo
owner/name. - Path or URL to one or more FRDs / PRD sections.
- Optional: a high-level goal in plain English from a human.
Preconditions (check before starting)
- The target repo has
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/liliput-task.ymland.github/liliput/labels.yml. If not, runbash scripts/bootstrap-liliput-flow.sh <target>(or instruct the orchestrator to). Do not author issues against a repo that has not been bootstrapped. - Required labels exist (
pm:ready,dev:in-progress,rm:review,rm:changes-requested,done,blocked:human,dev:rebase-needed). If not, the labels workflow has not run — bail and tell the orchestrator.
Process
- Read the FRD section(s). Identify the discrete behaviors that need to exist. Each discrete behavior maps to (usually) one issue.
- For each candidate behavior:
- Estimate complexity. If it is L, stop and split into S/M children. Never submit an L-sized issue.
- Write acceptance criteria as Gherkin
Scenarioblocks. One scenario per observable behavior. Each scenario must be verifiable by an automated test. - Write out-of-scope items explicitly. The RM rejects PRs that touch out-of-scope items.
- Open the issue using
gh issue createwith the template, ensuring:- Title prefixed with
[liliput]. - Label
pm:readyset. - Parent FRD link populated.
- Complexity is
SorM. - AC, out-of-scope, and DoD all filled.
- Title prefixed with
- Link related issues. If you produced N children from one parent behavior, cross-link them in each issue body so the dev and RM can see siblings.
gh invocations (canonical)
gh issue create \
--repo "$OWNER_REPO" \
--title "[liliput] $TITLE" \
--label "pm:ready" \
--body-file /tmp/issue-body.md/tmp/issue-body.md must match the field order of
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/liliput-task.yml. When using the form via web UI is
not available (agents typically use the REST API), reproduce the headings
verbatim so the structure is preserved.
Hard rules
- Never create an
Lissue. Always split. - Never include implementation steps in the AC. AC is about what, not how. Implementation hints go in the "Suggested approach" field and are non-binding.
- Never create an issue without a parent FRD link.
- Never create an issue without explicit out-of-scope items. If you genuinely think nothing is out of scope, write "Out of scope: none — this is a strictly bounded change" and explain why.
- Never assign yourself or anyone else. Assignment is the dev agent's signal that it has picked up the issue.
Output
For each issue created, return:
{
"issue_number": 42,
"url": "https://github.com/...",
"title": "[liliput] ...",
"complexity": "S|M",
"parent_frd": "specs/frd-...md#section"
}The orchestrator uses this to track which issues are in flight.
Escalation
If the FRD itself is ambiguous or contradictory, do not paper over it.
Comment on the FRD (or open a blocked:human meta-issue) and stop. The
spec-refinement skill exists for a reason — use it.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

