source-evaluation
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Evaluate a source's relevance, authority, transparency, recency, methodology, and limitations for a specific claim.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- cheyuriy/codelabgentheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- nahid-sparktales/agent-dispatchertheir own version, first seen Sep 21, 2026
- sivaguru-2113/Agent-personatheir own version, first seen Aug 18, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- nahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcher★ 59same name
- cheyuriy/codelabgen★ 1same name
- sivaguru-2113/Agent-persona★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository101 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- abstract-reviewSkill
- literature-gapSkill
- methodology-reviewSkill
- paper-structureSkill
- results-discussion-alignmentSkill
- reviewer-responseSkill
- book-outlineSkill
- chapter-purposeSkill
- character-consistencySkill
- narrative-arcSkill
- pacing-checkSkill
- timeline-consistencySkill
- citation-accuracySkill
- citation-checkSkill
- citation-completenessSkill
- citation-generationSkill
- citation-relevanceSkill
- citation-styleSkill
- duplicate-reference-checkSkill
- reference-list-checkSkill
- source-claim-mappingSkill
- source-to-claim-mapSkill
- active-voiceSkill
- ambiguity-checkSkill
- clarity-checkSkill
- coherence-checkSkill
- concision-checkSkill
- grammar-checkSkill
- jargon-checkSkill
- parallelism-checkSkill
- passive-voiceSkill
- proofreadingSkill
- punctuation-checkSkill
- readability-checkSkill
- redundancy-checkSkill
- repetition-checkSkill
- spelling-checkSkill
- terminology-consistencySkill
- tone-checkSkill
- attribution-auditSkill
- claim-auditSkill
- final-document-auditSkill
- overclaiming-checkSkill
- plagiarism-risk-reviewSkill
- quotation-integritySkill
- self-plagiarism-riskSkill
- source-provenanceSkill
- chapter-structureSkill
- manuscript-consistencySkill
- manuscript-readinessSkill
- manuscript-structureSkill
- title-page-checkSkill
- cover-letterSkill
- ethics-disclosure-checkSkill
- journal-fitSkill
- peer-review-readinessSkill
- submission-requirementsSkill
- coherence-checkSkill
- completeness-checkSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Source Evaluation
Assess the source for fit to the exact claim, author or institution credibility, publication context, methods, transparency, recency where relevant, and conflicts or limitations. Never equate prestige with correctness.
Quality gates: claim-specific evaluation and explicit evidence limitations.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.