agentleFS
convexconvex/agent-skills/skills/convex-advisor/SKILL.md

convex-advisor

Skill68 starsChanged 14 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Read the Convex deployment's 72h insights (read limits, OCC contention), root-cause each event in code, report evidence-backed perf/cost findings with fixes.

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 0 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use convex-acquire-domain, convex-check-updates and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • FabienGreardSkill

    convex-acquire-domain

    Find and buy a domain for the current Convex app through Convex, then bind it (labs; spend action).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • FabienGreardSkill

    convex-check-updates

    Check the current app's pinned Convex components against recommended versions and upgrade them behind a build gate.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • openclawSkill

    clawhub-ban-appeals

    Review ClawHub account-ban appeals, distinguish bans from moderation holds or blocked releases, and prepare an evidence-backed moderation decision. Route validated scanner inaccuracies to clawhub-clawscan.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • openclawSkill

    clawhub-clawscan

    Investigate ClawScan health alerts, diagnose scanner or ClawHub integration failures, prepare operational repairs, and route validated verdict inaccuracies upstream. Account ban appeals use clawhub-ban-appeals.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +8 more from openclaw

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read-only by construction: an advisory pass never mutates any deployment and never enables prod mutation flags (deploy-guard discipline …

    line 27
  2. Distinctive:

    Prefer component fixes over hand-rolls when they match (sharded-counter for OCC on counters, aggregate for count scans) — same bias as …

    line 32

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- GENERATED from convex-agents content/capabilities/convex-advisor.json — do not edit by hand. -->

Live-deployment advisor

Static review guesses; the deployment KNOWS. The official Convex MCP ships an insights tool with typed 72h health events per function — documentsReadLimit / bytesReadLimit (hard limit hits), documentsReadThreshold / bytesReadThreshold (approaching), occFailedPermanently / occRetried (write contention) — each carrying evidence (table_name, bytes_read, documents_read, occ document id + retry count). The advisor turns each event into a root-caused finding by reading the flagged function's actual code, and emits findings on the findings bus (specs/finding.schema.json) so fixers can be dispatched and launch-readiness can score.

Workflow

  1. GUARD: run deploy-guard step 0-1 — identify + announce the deployment being read. Reading insights/logs on prod is allowed read-only; never enable mutating prod access for an advisory pass.
  2. GATHER (deterministic, via the official Convex MCP): status → deployment selector; insights → the typed 72h events; tables → schema + row counts; functionSpec → the public/internal surface. The insights tool is only available on cloud dev/prod deployments when logged in as a user (not on previews or deploy-key-scoped contexts) and needs ~72h of traffic; if it returns nothing or is unavailable, say so and fall back to offering convex-reviewer — do NOT invent findings.
  3. ROOT-CAUSE each insight event by reading the flagged function's code:
    • bytesReadThreshold/Limit or documentsReadThreshold/Limit → look for .collect() / unindexed .filter() / missing pagination on the named table; the fix is an index + .withIndex, .take(n), or .paginate (convex-expert patterns), or an aggregate component for counting shapes.
    • occRetried / occFailedPermanently → look for read-modify-write hotspots on the named document (shared counters, status toggles); the fix is @convex-dev/sharded-counter, narrowing the read set, or moving contention to a workpool.
    • repeated failures in logs (status: failure) → classify: crash loop in a cron, validator rejections, unhandled error shapes.
  4. EMIT findings per specs/finding.schema.json: class perf/correctness/cost, severity from the insight kind (limit hits = high, thresholds = med, retried = med, permanent OCC failure = high), locus {kind: deployment, functionId, tableName}, evidence {kind: insight-event, detail: the raw event}, confidence: confirmed (the event happened — it is not a hypothesis), fixCapability + autofixable where the repair is mechanical.
  5. REPORT: findings ranked by severity, each with (a) the runtime evidence in one line ('messages:list read 4.2MB from messages 31× yesterday'), (b) the code-level root cause with file:line, (c) the concrete fix and which capability applies it. Offer to apply fixes; apply only on confirmation, then re-run insights after traffic to verify the trend, or re-run the static check immediately.
  6. Scope discipline: this is a health/perf/cost pass. Route authz findings to convex-authz, code-idiom findings to convex-reviewer, error triage to sentinel — emit a pointer finding rather than duplicating their work.

Rules

  • Evidence-not-vibes: every finding cites a real insight event, log line, or table stat — if the deployment has no evidence, the advisor has no findings (offer convex-reviewer instead).
  • Read-only by construction: an advisory pass never mutates any deployment and never enables prod mutation flags (deploy-guard discipline applies).
  • Root-cause in the code before reporting: an insight event names the symptom; the finding must name the line and the mechanism.
  • Emit on the findings bus (specs/finding.schema.json), confidence: confirmed — runtime events are facts, not hypotheses.
  • Severity from the event kind: limit-hit / permanent-OCC-failure = high; threshold / retried = med.
  • Stay in lane: perf/cost/health only — hand authz to convex-authz, style to convex-reviewer, error triage to sentinel.
  • Prefer component fixes over hand-rolls when they match (sharded-counter for OCC on counters, aggregate for count scans) — same bias as suggest.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.