agentleFS
FabienGreardFabienGreard/TouchGrassBar/.agents/skills/convex-check-updates/SKILL.md

convex-check-updates

Skill4 starsChanged 54 days agoMITView on GitHub

Check the current app's pinned Convex components against recommended versions and upgrade them behind a build gate.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run curl -fsSL https://graceful-tiger-715.convex.site/check-updates.mjs -o /tmp/cu.mjs && node /tmp/cu.mjs from the project root.

    line 14
  2. Very specific:

    If COMPONENTS_UP_TO_DATE: tell the user.

    line 15
  3. Very specific:

    If COMPONENTS_STALE=<n>: list each stale entry (component name, installed → current, summary, breaking flag) and ask the user before …

    line 16
  4. Distinctive:

    If any gate command fails: revert (git checkout -- .

    line 18
  5. Distinctive:

    Never upgrade without an explicit user yes — not even a minor version.

    line 24
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not auto-republish a live *.convex.app site after upgrading without user confirmation.

    line 27

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- GENERATED from convex-agents content/capabilities/check-updates.json — do not edit by hand. -->

check-updates

Detect stale Convex components in the current app against the anteater registry and, with explicit user consent, upgrade them one at a time behind a build gate (typecheck + next build). Each upgrade is gated and smoke-tested before the next.

Workflow

  1. Run curl -fsSL https://graceful-tiger-715.convex.site/check-updates.mjs -o /tmp/cu.mjs && node /tmp/cu.mjs from the project root.
  2. If COMPONENTS_UP_TO_DATE: tell the user; done.
  3. If COMPONENTS_STALE=<n>: list each stale entry (component name, installed → current, summary, breaking flag) and ask the user before touching anything.
  4. On yes: install the new ref, apply each migration.steps change (delegate convex/ edits to convex-expert), run every migration.gate command.
  5. If any gate command fails: revert (git checkout -- . or reinstall old ref) and report; never leave the app half-migrated.
  6. Give the user the smoke check (migration.smoke) to run after each successful upgrade.
  7. Repeat for each stale component, one at a time.

Rules

  • Never upgrade without an explicit user yes — not even a minor version.
  • Gate each component individually before moving to the next.
  • breaking:true upgrades require a snapshot (commit or branch) before applying.
  • Do not auto-republish a live *.convex.app site after upgrading without user confirmation.

Download now (ZIP)

Trending

Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Aug 30: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 6: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projects
Aug 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 0 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.