lenserfight
AGENTS.md18 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Merge with project-specific instructions as needed. Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment. Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs. Before implementing: - State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask. - If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently. - If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted. - If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask. Minimum code that…
- Reads credentials
Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.
Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,542 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository55 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ai-cost-manager-reducerSkill
- api-contract-reviewerSkill
- apps-language-rulesSkill
- cli-developerSkill
- contract-dto-consistency-reviewerSkill
- database-schema-reviewerSkill
- deep-code-reviewerSkill
- docs-managerSkill
- docs-publication-managerSkill
- feature-slice-designerSkill
- github-issue-solverSkill
- grasp-ooad-reviewSkill
- language-integratorSkill
- link-workspace-packagesSkill
- mcp-managerSkill
- migration-risk-reviewerSkill
- mobile-app-designerSkill
- mobile-app-integratorSkill
- mobile-app-product-ownerSkill
- mobile-app-reviewerSkill
- mobile-language-checkerSkill
- mobile-rulesetSkill
- mobil-ui-ux-rulesetSkill
- monitor-ciSkill
- nx-generateSkill
- nx-importSkill
- nx-pluginsSkill
- nx-run-tasksSkill
- nx-workspaceSkill
- product-owner-deciderSkill
- react-native-performance-reviewerSkill
- react-vite-performance-reviewerSkill
- release-readiness-reviewerSkill
- repo-architecture-auditorSkill
- repo-performance-guardSkill
- repository-pattern-reviewerSkill
- security-reviewerSkill
- smart-commitSkill
- supabase-api-rpc-reviewerSkill
- supabase-index-trigger-reviewerSkill
- supabase-rls-security-reviewerSkill
- supabase-schema-reviewerSkill
- tailwind-ui-ux-reviewerSkill
- ui-contract-guardSkill
- test-managerSkill
- unit-test-plannerSkill
- vite-performance-engineerSkill
- link-workspace-packagesSkill
- monitor-ciSkill
- nx-generateSkill
- nx-importSkill
- nx-pluginsSkill
- nx-run-tasksSkill
- nx-workspaceSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. About 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈16
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
- Distinctive: line 14
If a simpler approach exists, say so.
- Distinctive: line 15
If something is unclear, stop.
- Distinctive: line 21
No features beyond what was asked.
- Distinctive: line 22
No abstractions for single-use code.
- Distinctive: line 24
No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- Distinctive: line 25
If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
- Distinctive: line 27
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
- Distinctive: line 33
When editing existing code:
- Distinctive: line 34
Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Distinctive: line 35
Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Distinctive: line 37
If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
- Distinctive: line 39
When your changes create orphans:
- Very specific: line 40
Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Distinctive: line 41
Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
- Very specific: line 75
Branches: Always branch from development.
- Very specific: line 94
Run tasks via pnpm nx run/run-many/affected.
- Very specific: line 102
Prefer existing skills before inventing workflows.
- Distinctive: line 139
Before approving or modifying AI-powered code, always consider AI cost, token usage, repeated AI calls, cache opportunities, model-routing …
- Distinctive: line 146
Validation: Run smallest relevant check.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AGENTS.md
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Merge with project-specific instructions as needed.
Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
4. Performance Under Stress
Every change must survive heavy load. Before finishing, mentally stress the code at ~1M concurrent or near-concurrent users and account for memory usage, CPU cost, and network round-trips — flag N+1 queries, unbounded loops, blocking I/O, retry storms, and missing TTL/pagination instead of shipping them.
5. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
These guidelines are working if: fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes.
6. Git Workflow
Full rules:
docs/en/how-to/contributors/branching.md
Branches: Always branch from development. PRs target development. main is release-only — merged by maintainers only; pushing to main triggers the release pipeline.
Branch naming: feature/, fix/, docs/, refactor/ + short kebab slug (e.g., feature/agent-browse-filters).
Conventional Commits are required — they drive automated version bumps and CHANGELOG quality:
| Prefix | Version impact | When to use |
feat: | minor bump | New user-visible capability |
fix: · perf: · security: | patch bump | Bug fix / performance / security hardening |
refactor: · docs: · test: · chore: · ci: | no bump | Internal, no user-visible impact |
feat!: or footer BREAKING CHANGE: | major bump | Breaking API or contract change |
Non-conventional commits produce "version bump only" changelogs. Every user-facing change must use feat: or fix:.
<!-- nx configuration start--><!-- Leave the start & end comments to automatically receive updates. -->Nx
- Run tasks via
pnpm nx run/run-many/affected. Never guess flags — usenx_docsor--help. - Scaffold: invoke
nx-generateskill first. Explore: invokenx-workspaceskill first. - Plugin docs:
node_modules/@nx/<plugin>/PLUGIN.md(skip if missing). nx_docs: use for advanced config, migrations, edge cases. Skip for basic commands.
Operating Model
Instructions: AGENTS.md · Runtime: .codex/config.toml · Roles: .codex/agents/*.toml · Skills: .agents/skills/* .claude/skills/* .gemini/skills/*
Prefer existing skills before inventing workflows. Keep changes minimal, local, reversible. Preserve product/UI/test/Supabase boundaries. Docs: operational and concrete, no marketing language.
Roles: ci-monitor — CI/pipeline failures · explorer — trace paths, no edits · reviewer — arch/release/security risk · worker — implement once path is clear
LenserFight
Stack: Nx monorepo · apps/web entry · supabase/ DB · Supabase backend.
Layers (low→high): domain → api → data → features · infra · providers | cross-cut: shared types ui utils
Rules: Respect Nx boundaries · no domain logic in UI/routes · RLS-first Supabase · assess migration blast radius · edit existing libs before creating · placement before implementation.
Mobile env: No import.meta.env in Metro/Hermes. Use process.env.EXPO_PUBLIC_*. Add .native.tsx stubs for web-only barrel exports.
Skills
| Task | Skill |
| Repo shape/cycles/tags | repo-architecture-auditor |
| Feature placement | feature-slice-designer · repo-performance-guard |
| Responsibility/coupling | grasp-ooad-review |
| Vite/React perf† | vite-performance-engineer · react-vite-performance-reviewer |
| Tailwind/UX/a11y/tokens | tailwind-ui-ux-reviewer · ui-contract-guard |
| i18n/locale/SEO | apps-language-rules · language-integrator |
| Mobile design/impl/product | mobile-app-designer · mobile-app-integrator · mobile-app-product-owner |
| Mobile perf/locale† | mobile-app-reviewer · react-native-performance-reviewer · mobile-language-checker · mobile-ruleset |
| Tests | unit-test-planner · unit-tester |
| Deep review/security | deep-code-reviewer · security-reviewer |
| DTOs/contracts/data | contract-dto-consistency-reviewer · api-contract-reviewer · repository-pattern-reviewer |
| DB/RLS/indexes | supabase-schema-reviewer · database-schema-reviewer · supabase-rls-security-reviewer · supabase-index-trigger-reviewer · supabase-api-rpc-reviewer |
| Migration risk | migration-risk-reviewer |
| AI cost / token waste | ai-cost-manager-reducer |
| Docs (refactor / new pages) | docs-manager |
| Commits/docs/product | smart-commit · docs-publication-manager · product-owner-decider · release-readiness-reviewer |
† Enforce before approving any React/Vite or React Native/Expo change.
Before approving or modifying AI-powered code, always consider AI cost, token usage, repeated AI calls, cache opportunities, model-routing efficiency, and whether the optimization preserves the full reasoning chain and system correctness.
Teams (cross-layer only)
supabase-platform-team · frontend-experience-team · feature-delivery-team · release-governance-team · architecture-review-team
Delivery: Lead with findings · risky changes get rollout/rollback notes · DB work calls out grants/RLS/indexes/triggers · frontend calls out UX regressions/a11y/bundle · tests justify the layer.
Validation: Run smallest relevant check. State what was/wasn't validated. If CI wasn't run, say so.
<!-- nx configuration end-->Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

