quick
Skill4 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Quick start a change with minimal interaction. Use when fast-tracking a straightforward change that needs proposal, design, and tasks in one step.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Create a complete change setup (proposal, design, tasks) with a single confirmation point.
- Very specific: line 10
Arguments: If $ARGUMENTS is provided, use it as the name and optional description parameters.
- Very specific: line 18
If name and description provided → use them
- Very specific: line 19
If only name provided → infer description from conversation context
- Distinctive: line 20
If neither provided → infer both from conversation context
- Very specific: line 25
If specs/.delta/<name>/ already exists:
- Distinctive: line 27
Ask: Continue with existing change, or pick a different name?
- Very specific: line 28
If new → create specs/.delta/<name>/ directory
- Very specific: line 32
Create specs/.delta/<name>/proposal.md using the standard template.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/ds:quick <name> [description] - Quick start a change
Create a complete change setup (proposal, design, tasks) with a single confirmation point.
Arguments: If $ARGUMENTS is provided, use it as the name and optional description parameters. Otherwise, infer from conversation context.
Step 0: Version Check
See version-check.md for the standard version compatibility check procedure.
Step 1: Parse arguments or infer from context
- If
nameanddescriptionprovided → use them - If only
nameprovided → infer description from conversation context - If neither provided → infer both from conversation context
- Generate a kebab-case name if inferring (e.g., "add-user-auth")
Step 2: Check for existing change
- If
specs/.delta/<name>/already exists:- Warn: "Change '
<name>' already exists" - Ask: Continue with existing change, or pick a different name?
- Warn: "Change '
- If new → create
specs/.delta/<name>/directory
Step 3: Create proposal
Create specs/.delta/<name>/proposal.md using the standard template. See proposal-template.md.
Fill in sections based on the provided description and conversation context. Keep it concise but complete.
Step 4: Show proposal and confirm
Display the generated proposal to the user, then ask:
Proceed with planning and task generation? [y/N]
- On "y" or "yes" → continue to Step 5
- On "n", empty, or anything else → stop here
- Tell user: "Proposal saved. You can refine it with
/ds:new <name>or continue later with/ds:plan"
- Tell user: "Proposal saved. You can refine it with
Note: Steps 5-7 run without additional prompts.
Step 5: Run planning
Execute the planning phase without interaction:
- Explore the codebase - Find relevant code, patterns, architecture
- Create design.md - See design-template.md for the format
- Create delta specs - Generate
specs/.delta/<name>/specs/<domain>.mdfiles
Step 6: Run task generation
Execute task generation without interaction:
- Analyze design and delta specs
- Identify implementation tasks
- Create tasks.md with ordered, actionable tasks
- Check for test infrastructure - include test tasks if tests exist
Step 7: Output summary
Display a summary of everything created:
✓ Created proposal.md
✓ Created design.md
✓ Created specs/<domain>.md
✓ Created tasks.md (N tasks)
Ready to implement. Run `/ds:archive` when complete.Behavior Notes
- Designed for straightforward changes with well-understood scope
- For complex changes requiring discussion, use
/ds:new→/ds:plan→/ds:tasks - The proposal confirmation is the single gate — it must capture the intended scope
- Archive still requires separate confirmation (
/ds:archive)
Other versions15 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 15
- notque/vexjoy-agent★ 444same name
- notque/claude-code-toolkit★ 442same name
- govctl-org/govctl★ 272same name
- joetawil7/first-pass★ 128same name
- buildomator/buildomator★ 101same name
- rizukirr/vibekit★ 20same name
- jamillazarev/multica-ops★ 11same name
- Yafan-Yang/ai-trading★ 4same name
- beeltec/skills★ 2same name
- foliveira/harmonia★ 2same name
5 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use plant-seed, discuss and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
buildomatorSkillplant-seed
Capture a forward-looking idea with trigger conditions — surfaces automatically at the right milestone
Also in 3 projects that use this
markmdevSkilldiscuss
Discuss a problem with other AI agents before implementing. Spawns one or more autonomous claude -p conversations with different perspectives (architect, critic, domain expert), runs multi-round discussions, and synthesizes findings. Use when facing design decisions, architecture tradeoffs, knowledge organization questions, or any problem that benefits from multiple viewpoints before committing to an approach. Also use proactively when you're uncertain about a direction.
Also in 4 projects that use this
NVIDIASkillresearch
Before designing a feature, research how comparable libraries solve the problem, check best practices, known pitfalls, and upstream changes. Use when starting a new feature, investigating an unfamiliar area, or the user asks to research something.
Also in 4 projects that use this
AWSSkillship
Finalize dev work on an issue branch — update docs, push, and open a PR.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Hugging FaceSkillimplement
Make tests pass. Invoke after /write-tests produces failing tests.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

