agentleFS
Sign inStart free
claude-office-skillsclaude-office-skills/skills/lead-qualification/SKILL.md

Lead Qualification

Skill433 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

Score and qualify leads based on criteria and fit

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Document everything: Keep CRM updated

    line 306
  2. Distinctive:

    Not identifying all stakeholders

    line 313

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Lead Qualification

Score and qualify leads based on defined criteria to focus sales efforts effectively.

Overview

This skill helps you:

  • Evaluate leads against qualification criteria
  • Score leads for prioritization
  • Identify deal-breakers and green flags
  • Recommend next actions
  • Maintain consistent qualification

Qualification Frameworks

BANT (Budget, Authority, Need, Timeline)

## BANT Qualification: [Lead Name]

### Budget (/25)
| Question | Answer | Score |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Defined budget? | [Yes/No/Unknown] | /10 |
| Budget range? | [$X - $Y] | /10 |
| Budget fits our pricing? | [Yes/No] | /5 |
**Budget Score**: [X]/25

### Authority (/25)
| Question | Answer | Score |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Decision maker? | [Yes/No/Influencer] | /10 |
| Who else involved? | [Names/Roles] | /5 |
| Sign-off process? | [Description] | /5 |
| Champion identified? | [Yes/No] | /5 |
**Authority Score**: [X]/25

### Need (/25)
| Question | Answer | Score |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Clear pain point? | [Description] | /10 |
| Impact of not solving? | [Description] | /10 |
| Using alternatives? | [Current solution] | /5 |
**Need Score**: [X]/25

### Timeline (/25)
| Question | Answer | Score |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Target implementation? | [Date/Quarter] | /10 |
| Urgency level? | [High/Medium/Low] | /10 |
| Trigger event? | [Description] | /5 |
**Timeline Score**: [X]/25

---
**Total BANT Score**: [X]/100
**Qualification**: [Qualified / Needs Work / Not Qualified]

MEDDIC (Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process, Identify Pain, Champion)

## MEDDIC Qualification: [Lead Name]

### Metrics
**Business impact they expect**:
- [Metric 1]: [Current] → [Target]
- [Metric 2]: [Current] → [Target]

### Economic Buyer
**Person with budget authority**:
- Name: [Name]
- Title: [Title]
- Access: [Direct/Indirect/None]

### Decision Criteria
**How they'll evaluate solutions**:
1. [Criterion 1] - Weight: [%]
2. [Criterion 2] - Weight: [%]
3. [Criterion 3] - Weight: [%]

### Decision Process
**Steps to purchase**:
1. [Step 1] - Owner: [Name] - Timeline: [Date]
2. [Step 2] - Owner: [Name] - Timeline: [Date]
3. [Step 3] - Owner: [Name] - Timeline: [Date]

### Identify Pain
**Core problem**:
[Description of the pain point]

**Implications of not solving**:
[Business impact]

### Champion
**Internal advocate**:
- Name: [Name]
- Influence level: [High/Medium/Low]
- What they gain: [Personal win]

---
**MEDDIC Coverage**: [X]/6 elements confirmed
**Deal Health**: [Strong / At Risk / Weak]

GPCTBA/C&I (Goals, Plans, Challenges, Timeline, Budget, Authority, Consequences & Implications)

## GPCTBA/C&I: [Lead Name]

### Goals
What are they trying to achieve?
- [Goal 1]
- [Goal 2]

### Plans
How do they plan to achieve it?
- [Current plan]

### Challenges
What's stopping them?
- [Challenge 1]
- [Challenge 2]

### Timeline
When do they need to achieve this?
- Target: [Date]
- Urgency: [High/Medium/Low]

### Budget
What resources are allocated?
- Amount: [Range]
- Approved: [Yes/No/Pending]

### Authority
Who makes the decision?
- Decision Maker: [Name]
- Influencers: [Names]
- Process: [Description]

### Consequences (Negative)
What happens if they don't solve this?
- [Consequence 1]
- [Consequence 2]

### Implications (Positive)
What happens when they succeed?
- [Benefit 1]
- [Benefit 2]

Lead Scoring Model

Fit Score (Demographics)

## Fit Scoring Criteria

### Company Fit (50 points)
| Criterion | Points | Lead Value | Score |
|-----------|--------|------------|-------|
| Industry | /15 | [Industry] | |
| Company Size | /15 | [Employees] | |
| Revenue | /10 | [Revenue] | |
| Geography | /10 | [Location] | |
**Company Fit**: [X]/50

### Contact Fit (50 points)
| Criterion | Points | Lead Value | Score |
|-----------|--------|------------|-------|
| Title/Role | /20 | [Title] | |
| Department | /15 | [Dept] | |
| Seniority | /15 | [Level] | |
**Contact Fit**: [X]/50

**Total Fit Score**: [X]/100

Engagement Score (Behavioral)

## Engagement Scoring

### Website Activity
| Action | Points | Occurrences | Score |
|--------|--------|-------------|-------|
| Pricing page view | 10 | [X] | |
| Demo request | 25 | [X] | |
| Content download | 5 | [X] | |
| Blog visit | 2 | [X] | |

### Email Engagement
| Action | Points | Occurrences | Score |
|--------|--------|-------------|-------|
| Email opened | 1 | [X] | |
| Link clicked | 3 | [X] | |
| Replied | 10 | [X] | |

### Event Participation
| Action | Points | Occurrences | Score |
|--------|--------|-------------|-------|
| Webinar attended | 15 | [X] | |
| Meeting booked | 25 | [X] | |

**Total Engagement Score**: [X]/100

Output Format

Lead Qualification Report

# Lead Qualification: [Company/Contact]

## Summary
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| **Fit Score** | [X]/100 |
| **Engagement Score** | [X]/100 |
| **BANT Score** | [X]/100 |
| **Overall** | [X]/100 |

## Qualification Status
🟢 **QUALIFIED** / 🟡 **NEEDS NURTURING** / 🔴 **NOT QUALIFIED**

## Key Findings
### ✅ Green Flags
1. [Positive indicator]
2. [Positive indicator]

### ⚠️ Yellow Flags
1. [Concern that needs addressing]
2. [Missing information]

### ❌ Red Flags
1. [Deal-breaker or major concern]

## Gaps to Address
| Gap | Question to Ask | Priority |
|-----|-----------------|----------|
| [Unknown area] | [Specific question] | High |
| [Unknown area] | [Specific question] | Medium |

## Recommended Next Steps
1. [Immediate action]
2. [Follow-up action]
3. [Long-term action]

## Disqualification Criteria Check
- [ ] Below minimum company size
- [ ] Outside target geography
- [ ] No budget authority
- [ ] Timeline > 12 months
- [ ] Already using competitor with lock-in

Best Practices

Qualification Tips

  1. Ask open-ended questions: Get context, not just yes/no
  2. Verify, don't assume: Confirm information directly
  3. Document everything: Keep CRM updated
  4. Re-qualify regularly: Situations change
  5. Know when to walk away: Time is valuable

Common Mistakes

  • Qualifying too quickly
  • Ignoring red flags
  • Not identifying all stakeholders
  • Assuming budget = ability to buy
  • Forgetting to re-qualify over time

Limitations

  • Cannot access CRM data directly
  • Scoring requires defined criteria from user
  • Cannot verify provided information
  • Qualification is guidance, not guarantee
  • Human judgment still essential

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free