agentleFS
checkout-pagecheckout-page/ecommerce-skills/skills/product-copy/SKILL.md

product-copy

Skill5 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when writing or rewriting a product description, product title, benefit list, feature bullets, or on-page product messaging for an online store — e.g. "write a description for this product", "rewrite my product copy", "how many benefits should I list", "should I say 500g or 25 servings", "name this color", "should we mention it's lab-tested".

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write product descriptions that people find persuasive, easy to grasp, and worth paying more for.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Best features only: Don't pad with merely good features — the impression sinks to the weakest claim.

    line 34

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Product copy

Write product descriptions that people find persuasive, easy to grasp, and worth paying more for. The rules change how copy is structured and measured — number of claims, units, names, register — which move purchase intent and willingness to pay more than adjectives do.

When to use

  • Writing or rewriting a description, title, bullets, or hero message
  • Choosing which features to mention, how many, in what units and register

When not to use

  • Auditing the whole page → product-page; photo/video direction → product-visuals
  • Discount or promotion wording → discounts / promotions

Inputs

Collect, or state your assumption:

  • Product facts: materials, quantity, specs, ingredients or components (any branded?)
  • The full list of candidate benefits
  • Audience and how technical they are
  • Where the copy sits and the length limit

Classify the product first. Hedonic = bought for enjoyment, pleasure, or the experience (chocolate, fashion, decor, travel, spa, perfume). Utilitarian = bought to do a job, judged on function and value (detergent, appliances, insect repellent, tools, accounting software). If it's mixed, decide by what the buyer is optimizing for at the moment of purchase.

Procedure

  1. Pick three claims. Rank the benefits; keep the top three (three claims were 10.4% more persuasive than four; skepticism starts at the fourth). Move the rest to a spec table.
  2. Best features only. Don't pad with merely good features — the impression sinks to the weakest claim.
  3. Units people use. Uses or pieces (30 washes, 8 cans), not standardized measures (750 g, 96 oz). Raises product evaluations and willingness to pay.
  4. Smaller units for precision. Drop to the next unit down: 180 seconds, not 3 minutes; 180 minutes, not 3 hours; 32 oz, not a quarter gallon. Reads more precise and credible; strongest for time.
  5. Evocative color names. "Midday sky blue", not "light blue".
  6. Feature branded components. A branded ingredient or part (Gore-Tex, a licensed enzyme blend) goes up front; demand up to 40% higher. †
  7. Register by product type. Utilitarian → science and effectiveness language works. Hedonic → avoid it ("lab-formulated" on a treat: up to 30% less likely to be chosen). †
  8. Plain language. Unknown terms make the product seem worse and pricier; define or drop. †
  9. Describe touch where feel matters (textiles, skincare) — the top online clothing pain point.
  10. Rational up, emotional down in vertical layouts.
  11. Frame as an experience (coffee with friends, not bean origin) when you want reviews. †

Output

  1. Headline and body within the length limit.
  2. Rules table:
RuleWhere
Three claimsstain removal, cold water, gentle on skin
Intuitive units"30 washes" for "750 g"
Branded ingredientlicensed enzyme blend, first sentence
  1. What was cut and where it can go.

Common mistakes

  • Working every supplied benefit in — six benefits read as a pitch; pick three.
  • Leading with pack weight or volume — lead with uses.
  • Keeping the supplier's color name.
  • "Lab-tested" on a hedonic product.

Quick reference

ElementRule
ClaimsExactly three, best only
QuantityUses/pieces, not grams/ounces
PrecisionSmaller unit
ColorsEvocative names
ComponentsName the brand
RegisterScience only if utilitarian
VocabularyPlain
TextureDescribe if feel matters
LayoutRational up, emotional down

† No primary citation on file for this rule — a practitioner tip, not a measured finding.

Evidence and effect sizes: see reference.md.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.