ui-review
Skill18 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use to review one app page per run in a sandbox environment: screenshots, design-system deviations, UX of the main flow; fixes objective deviations only. Chantier: needs an approved chantier issue and a sandbox target.
20 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- colasama/MahoShojo-Generatortheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- WilliamEbong/CourseForgetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- buildomator/buildomatortheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- krzysztofsurdy/code-virtuosotheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- TucsenRoman/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- arla6ka/design.howtheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use accessibility and grill-me.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ElasticSkillaccessibility
Accessibility guidance for Kibana. Use this skill when working with or reviewing EUI components, resolving a11y-related (@elastic/eui) ESLint issues, and ensuring proper use of ARIA attributes, focus management, keyboard interactions, and accessible naming conventions.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillgrill-me
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions20 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 20
- RandallLiuXin/GodotMaker★ 555same name
- arla6ka/design.how★ 281same name
- arla6ka/skills★ 281same name
- colasama/MahoShojo-Generator★ 167same name
- jvm-skills/jvm-skills★ 140same name
- buildomator/buildomator★ 102same name
- krzysztofsurdy/code-virtuoso★ 36same name
- nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection★ 33same name
- applypack/applypack★ 30same name
- mia-cx/skills★ 4same name
10 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.
- autopilot-retroSkill
- autopilotSkill
- ci-doctorSkill
- dead-code-sweepSkill
- dedupe-factorSkill
- deps-patrolSkill
- docs-driftSkill
- ds-migrateSkill
- flaky-huntSkill
- harvest-reviewsSkill
- pattern-alignSkill
- perf-fixSkill
- primitives-alignSkill
- refactor-sliceSkill
- security-fixSkill
- test-gap-fillSkill
- todo-reaperSkill
- todoSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 6
Read .quota-burner/CONTRACT.md and the configured team context before targeting.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Read .quota-burner/CONTRACT.md and the configured team context before targeting. Standalone invocation follows repository permissions and does not authorize a PR by itself.
Review ONE app page per run in a sandbox environment, and fix the objective deviations found.
Targeting: page rotation lives in the chantier issue; your design system defines "objective deviation". Use the available browser tooling for before/after screenshots at desktop and mobile sizes, including key states.
Done: PR with before/after screenshots from synthetic sandbox data, attached through the repository’s review flow. Never a redesign: ambitious ideas become issues, not diffs.
Requires a sandbox target (deployed URL + test credentials) and its domains in your session's network allowlist; keep disabled until they exist.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

