reproduction-steps
Skill0 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub
Write a minimal, numbered reproduction for a support ticket, with environment, expected and actual results, so an engineer can confirm a suspected bug. Use for bug-shaped tickets and before escalating.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- escalationSkill
- kb-articleSkill
- known-issue-searchSkill
- log-evidenceSkill
- redactionSkill
- response-draftingSkill
- support-triageSkill
- ticket-intakeSkill
- triage-reportSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Write the steps; do not run them.
- Distinctive: line 13
Use synthetic or sanitized data only.
- Distinctive: line 37
Remove any step that does not change the outcome.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Reproduction Steps
A good reproduction is the cheapest way to move a hypothesis from Suspected to Confirmed. Write it so another engineer can follow it without reading the ticket.
Rules
- Write the steps; do not run them. This workflow has no shell and must not touch customer systems. A human or a sandbox runs the reproduction.
- Use synthetic or sanitized data only. Never put customer identifiers, tokens or real payloads in the steps.
- Change one variable at a time. If the hypothesis is "SDK 3.12.0 drops events on navigation", the control run is the same steps on the previous SDK version.
- Mark each step's source: from the ticket, from docs, or assumed. Assumed steps lower confidence until confirmed.
Format
### Reproduction (status: not yet run | confirmed | not reproduced)
**Environment:** <product version / SDK version / runtime / browser + OS / region / plan>
**Preconditions:** <account state, feature flags, config, test data>
1. <action> (source: ticket)
2. <action> (source: docs)
3. <action> (source: assumed)
**Expected:** <documented or previously observed behavior, with evidence row>
**Actual:** <what the customer reports, with evidence row>
**Control:** <the same steps with one variable changed, and its expected result>
**Frequency:** <always | intermittent (n of m) | once>Minimizing
Remove any step that does not change the outcome. Stop when every remaining step is necessary. If you cannot reduce it below about ten steps, say so and list which steps you are unsure about.
Using it
- In the triage report, put the reproduction under Recommended Next Action and reference it from Escalation Decision.
- In an escalation brief, paste it into the Reproduction section unchanged.
- In the customer reply, ask only for the facts needed to fill gaps (for example the exact SDK version), not for the whole reproduction.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

