buildpad-verify-completion
Skill1 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub
Verify completion and success claims with fresh evidence. Use before claiming a task is complete, a fix works, tests pass, or a feature is ready for GO.
In this repository66 other files it gives its agents.
- add-ai-chatSkill
- add-buildpadSkill
- add-commentsSkill
- add-cronSkill
- add-external-oauthSkill
- add-filesSkill
- add-i18nSkill
- add-mcp-serverSkill
- add-microappSkill
- add-microfrontendSkill
- add-microfrontend-zonesSkill
- add-mobile-appSkill
- add-multitenancySkill
- add-usersSkill
- add-workflowsSkill
- amplify-env-varsSkill
- authentication-proxySkill
- buildpad-debugSkill
- buildpad-discoverySkill
- buildpad-implSkill
- buildpad-referenceSkill
- buildpad-reviewSkill
- buildpad-spec-batchSkill
- buildpad-spec-designSkill
- buildpad-spec-initSkill
- buildpad-spec-quickSkill
- buildpad-spec-requirementsSkill
- buildpad-spec-statusSkill
- buildpad-spec-tasksSkill
- buildpad-steering-customSkill
- buildpad-steeringSkill
- buildpad-validate-designSkill
- buildpad-validate-gapSkill
- buildpad-validate-implSkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- create-api-routeSkill
- create-collectionSkill
- create-componentSkill
- create-cronSkill
- create-featureSkill
- create-form-builderSkill
- create-migrationSkill
- create-projectSkill
- create-rbacSkill
- create-serviceSkill
- create-testsSkill
- create-workflowSkill
- daas-platformSkill
- debugging-and-error-recoverySkill
- generate-docsSkill
- git-workflow-and-versioningSkill
- grant-module-accessSkill
- hooks-extensionsSkill
- idea-refineSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- manage-scopeSkill
- migrate-to-engineSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. About 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈12
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Before saying a task is complete
- Distinctive: line 17
Before saying a bug is fixed
- Distinctive: line 18
Before saying tests pass
- Distinctive: line 19
Before moving to the next task in autonomous execution
- Very specific: line 20
Before reporting GO from feature-level validation
- Distinctive: line 21
Before trusting another subagent's success report
- Distinctive: line 23
Do not use this skill for early planning or speculative status updates.
- Very specific: line 55
Use the language specified in spec.json.
- Distinctive: line 62
Check exit code, failure count, skipped scope, and missing coverage.
- Very specific: line 64
If mandatory validation cannot be completed, return MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED.
- Distinctive: line 65
Only then allow the claim.
- Distinctive: line 72
no unresolved blocking findings from review
- Distinctive: line 78
no broader regressions in the relevant verification scope
- Distinctive: line 84
no inference from unrelated checks
- Distinctive: line 100
No canonical validation command is known
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
buildpad-verify-completion
Overview
This skill prevents false completion claims. A task, fix, or feature is only complete when supported by fresh evidence that matches the scope of the claim.
When to Use
- Before saying a task is complete
- Before saying a bug is fixed
- Before saying tests pass
- Before moving to the next task in autonomous execution
- Before reporting
GOfrom feature-level validation - Before trusting another subagent's success report
Do not use this skill for early planning or speculative status updates.
Inputs
Provide:
- The exact claim to verify
- Claim type:
TASKFIXTEST_OR_BUILDFEATURE_GO
- Validation commands discovered by the controller
- Fresh command output and exit codes
- Relevant task IDs, requirement IDs, and design refs where applicable
- For feature-level claims:
- requirements coverage status
- design alignment status
- integration status
- blocked task status
Outputs
Return one of:
VERIFIEDNOT_VERIFIEDMANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED
Also return:
- Claim reviewed
- Evidence used
- Scope/evidence mismatch, if any
Use the language specified in spec.json.
Gate Function
- Identify the exact claim.
- Identify the exact command or checklist that proves that claim.
- Require fresh evidence from the current code state.
- Check exit code, failure count, skipped scope, and missing coverage.
- Reject claims that are broader than the evidence.
- If mandatory validation cannot be completed, return
MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED. - Only then allow the claim.
Claim-Specific Rules
TASK
Require:
- task-local verification evidence
- no unresolved blocking findings from review
- evidence aligned with the task boundary
FIX
Require:
- evidence that the original symptom is resolved
- no broader regressions in the relevant verification scope
TEST_OR_BUILD
Require:
- actual command output
- exit code
- no inference from unrelated checks
FEATURE_GO
Require:
- full test suite result
- runtime smoke boot result showing the built artifact reaches its first usable state
- requirements coverage assessment
- cross-task integration assessment
- design end-to-end alignment assessment
- blocked tasks assessment
A passing test suite alone is not enough for FEATURE_GO.
Stop / Escalate
Return MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED when:
- No canonical validation command is known
- The required environment is unavailable
- A mandatory manual verification step cannot be executed
Return NOT_VERIFIED when:
- The command failed
- Evidence is stale
- Evidence is partial
- The claim exceeds the evidence
- The feature still has unresolved blocked tasks or uncovered requirements
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
| “The subagent said it succeeded” | Reported success is not verification evidence. |
| “Tests passed earlier” | Fresh evidence only. |
| “Build should be fine because lint passed” | Lint does not prove build success. |
| “Tests passed and build succeeded, so it must run” | Type erasure, module loading, native ABI, and boot-time config issues can still fail at runtime. |
| “The feature is done because all tasks are checked off” | FEATURE_GO also requires coverage, integration, and design alignment. |
Output Format
## Verification Result
- STATUS: VERIFIED | NOT_VERIFIED | MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED
- CLAIM_TYPE: TASK | FIX | TEST_OR_BUILD | FEATURE_GO
- CLAIM: <exact claim>
- EVIDENCE: <command/checklist and result>
- GAPS: <scope/evidence mismatch or missing validation>
- NOTES: <next action if not verified>Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

