buildpad-spec-quick
Skill1 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub
Quick spec generation with interactive or automatic mode
In this repository66 other files it gives its agents.
- add-ai-chatSkill
- add-buildpadSkill
- add-commentsSkill
- add-cronSkill
- add-external-oauthSkill
- add-filesSkill
- add-i18nSkill
- add-mcp-serverSkill
- add-microappSkill
- add-microfrontendSkill
- add-microfrontend-zonesSkill
- add-mobile-appSkill
- add-multitenancySkill
- add-usersSkill
- add-workflowsSkill
- amplify-env-varsSkill
- authentication-proxySkill
- buildpad-debugSkill
- buildpad-discoverySkill
- buildpad-implSkill
- buildpad-referenceSkill
- buildpad-reviewSkill
- buildpad-spec-batchSkill
- buildpad-spec-designSkill
- buildpad-spec-initSkill
- buildpad-spec-requirementsSkill
- buildpad-spec-statusSkill
- buildpad-spec-tasksSkill
- buildpad-steering-customSkill
- buildpad-steeringSkill
- buildpad-validate-designSkill
- buildpad-validate-gapSkill
- buildpad-validate-implSkill
- buildpad-verify-completionSkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- create-api-routeSkill
- create-collectionSkill
- create-componentSkill
- create-cronSkill
- create-featureSkill
- create-form-builderSkill
- create-migrationSkill
- create-projectSkill
- create-rbacSkill
- create-serviceSkill
- create-testsSkill
- create-workflowSkill
- daas-platformSkill
- debugging-and-error-recoverySkill
- generate-docsSkill
- git-workflow-and-versioningSkill
- grant-module-accessSkill
- hooks-extensionsSkill
- idea-refineSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- manage-scopeSkill
- migrate-to-engineSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. About 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈13
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
After Phase 4, run the final sanity review before exiting
- Distinctive: line 20
Stop ONLY after the sanity review completes or if error occurs
- Distinctive: line 27
Before claiming quick generation is complete, run one lightweight sanity review over the generated requirements, design, and tasks.
- Very specific: line 34
If contains --auto: Automatic Mode (execute all 4 phases)
- Very specific: line 57
If .kiro/specs/{feature-name}/brief.md exists (created by /buildpad-discovery), read it for discovery context (problem, approach, scope, …
- Very specific: line 58
Use brief content as the project description instead of $ARGUMENTS
- Distinctive: line 63
Keep name concise (2-4 words ideally)
- Very specific: line 66
Use Glob to check .kiro/specs/*/
- Very specific: line 67
If directory exists with only brief.md (no spec.json), use that directory (discovery created it)
- Very specific: line 71
Use Bash: mkdir -p .kiro/specs/{feature-name} (skip if already exists from discovery)
- Distinctive: line 100
If "no": Stop, show current state
- Distinctive: line 101
If "yes": Continue to Phase 2
- Distinctive: line 109
Wait for completion. IGNORE any "Next Step" message (it is for standalone usage).
- Distinctive: line 125
Wait for completion. IGNORE any "Next Step" message.
- Distinctive: line 149
After Phase 4, run a lightweight sanity review before claiming completion.
- Distinctive: line 152
Prefer a fresh review subagent when the host supports it.
- Distinctive: line 154
Do requirements, design, and tasks tell a coherent story?
- Very specific: line 157
If the review finds only task-plan-local issues, repair or update the generated tasks.md once, then re-run the sanity review.
- Distinctive: line 158
If the review finds a real requirements/design gap or contradiction, stop and report follow-up instead of claiming the quick spec is …
- Distinctive: line 198
After each phase, show brief progress:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Quick Spec Generator
<instructions>
## CRITICAL: Automatic Mode Execution RulesIf --auto flag is present in $ARGUMENTS, you are in AUTOMATIC MODE.
In Automatic Mode:
- Execute ALL 4 phases in a continuous loop without stopping
- Display progress after each phase (e.g., "Phase 1/4 complete: spec initialized")
- IGNORE any "Next Step" messages from Phase 2-4 (they are for standalone usage)
- After Phase 4, run the final sanity review before exiting
- Stop ONLY after the sanity review completes or if error occurs
Core Task
Execute 4 spec phases sequentially. In automatic mode, execute all phases without stopping. In interactive mode, prompt user for approval between phases.
Before claiming quick generation is complete, run one lightweight sanity review over the generated requirements, design, and tasks. If the host supports fresh subagents, use one. Otherwise run the sanity review inline.
Execution Steps
Step 1: Parse Arguments and Initialize
Parse $ARGUMENTS:
- If contains
--auto: Automatic Mode (execute all 4 phases) - Otherwise: Interactive Mode (prompt at each phase)
- Extract description (remove
--autoflag if present)
Example:
"User profile with avatar upload --auto" → mode=automatic, description="User profile with avatar upload"
"User profile feature" → mode=interactive, description="User profile feature"Display mode banner and proceed to Step 2.
Step 2: Execute Phase Loop
Execute these 4 phases in order:
Phase 1: Initialize Spec (Direct Implementation)
Core Logic:
- Check for Brief:
- If
.kiro/specs/{feature-name}/brief.mdexists (created by/buildpad-discovery), read it for discovery context (problem, approach, scope, constraints) - Use brief content as the project description instead of
$ARGUMENTS
- If
- Generate Feature Name:
- Convert description to kebab-case
- Example: "User profile with avatar upload" → "user-profile-avatar-upload"
- Keep name concise (2-4 words ideally)
- Check Uniqueness:
- Use Glob to check
.kiro/specs/*/ - If directory exists with only
brief.md(nospec.json), use that directory (discovery created it) - Otherwise if feature name exists, append
-2,-3, etc.
- Use Glob to check
- Create Directory:
- Use Bash:
mkdir -p .kiro/specs/{feature-name}(skip if already exists from discovery)
- Use Bash:
Initialize Files from Templates:
a. Read templates:
- .kiro/settings/templates/specs/init.json - .kiro/settings/templates/specs/requirements-init.mdb. Replace placeholders:
{{FEATURE_NAME}} → feature-name {{TIMESTAMP}} → current ISO 8601 timestamp (use `date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ"`) {{PROJECT_DESCRIPTION}} → description en → language code (detect from user's input language, default to `en`)c. Write files using Write tool:
- .kiro/specs/{feature-name}/spec.json - .kiro/specs/{feature-name}/requirements.md- Output Progress: "Phase 1/4 complete: Spec initialized at .kiro/specs/{feature-name}/"
Automatic Mode: IMMEDIATELY continue to Phase 2.
Interactive Mode: Prompt "Continue to requirements generation? (yes/no)"
- If "no": Stop, show current state
- If "yes": Continue to Phase 2
Phase 2: Generate Requirements
Invoke /buildpad-spec-requirements {feature-name} via the Skill tool.
Wait for completion. IGNORE any "Next Step" message (it is for standalone usage).
Output Progress: "Phase 2/4 complete: Requirements generated"
Automatic Mode: IMMEDIATELY continue to Phase 3.
Interactive Mode: Prompt "Continue to design generation? (yes/no)"
- If "no": Stop, show current state
- If "yes": Continue to Phase 3
Phase 3: Generate Design
Invoke /buildpad-spec-design {feature-name} -y via the Skill tool. The -y flag auto-approves requirements.
Wait for completion. IGNORE any "Next Step" message.
Output Progress: "Phase 3/4 complete: Design generated"
Automatic Mode: IMMEDIATELY continue to Phase 4.
Interactive Mode: Prompt "Continue to tasks generation? (yes/no)"
- If "no": Stop, show current state
- If "yes": Continue to Phase 4
Phase 4: Generate Tasks
Invoke /buildpad-spec-tasks {feature-name} -y via the Skill tool.
Note: -y flag auto-approves requirements, design, and tasks.
Wait for completion.
Output Progress: "Phase 4/4 complete: Tasks generated"
Final Sanity Review
After Phase 4, run a lightweight sanity review before claiming completion.
- Review
requirements.md,design.md, andtasks.mddirectly from disk. Ifbrief.mdexists, use it only as supporting context. - Prefer a fresh review subagent when the host supports it. Pass only file paths and the review objective; the reviewer should read the generated files itself.
- Review focus:
- Do requirements, design, and tasks tell a coherent story?
- Are there obvious contradictions, missing prerequisites, or missing task coverage for required design work?
- Are
_Depends:_,_Boundary:_, and(P)markers plausible for implementation?
- If the review finds only task-plan-local issues, repair or update the generated
tasks.mdonce, then re-run the sanity review. - If the review finds a real requirements/design gap or contradiction, stop and report follow-up instead of claiming the quick spec is implementation-ready.
All 4 phases plus sanity review complete.
Output final completion summary (see Output Description section) and exit.
Important Constraints
Error Handling
- Any phase failure stops the workflow
- Display error and current state
- Suggest manual recovery command
</instructions>Output Description
Mode Banners
Interactive Mode:
Quick Spec Generation (Interactive Mode)
You will be prompted at each phase.
Note: Skips gap analysis and design validation.Automatic Mode:
Quick Spec Generation (Automatic Mode)
All phases execute automatically without prompts.
Note: Skips optional validations (gap analysis, design review) and user approval prompts. Internal review gates still run.
Final sanity review still runs.Intermediate Output
After each phase, show brief progress:
Spec initialized at .kiro/specs/{feature}/
Requirements generated → Continuing to design...
Design generated → Continuing to tasks...Final Completion Summary
Provide output in the language specified in spec.json:
Quick Spec Generation Complete!
Generated Files:
- specs/{feature}/spec.json
- specs/{feature}/requirements.md ({X} requirements)
- specs/{feature}/design.md ({Y} components, {Z} endpoints)
- specs/{feature}/tasks.md ({N} tasks)
Skipped: /buildpad-validate-gap, /buildpad-validate-design
Sanity review: PASSED | FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED
Next Steps:
1. Review generated specs (especially design.md)
2. Optional: `/buildpad-validate-gap {feature}`, `/buildpad-validate-design {feature}`
3. Start implementation: `/buildpad-impl {feature}`Safety & Fallback
Error Scenarios
Template Missing:
- Check
.kiro/settings/templates/specs/exists - Report specific missing file
- Exit with error
Directory Creation Failed:
- Check permissions
- Report error with path
- Exit with error
Phase Execution Failed (Phase 2-4):
- Stop workflow
- Show current state and completed phases
- Suggest: "Continue manually from
/buildpad-spec-{next-phase} {feature}"
Sanity Review Failed:
- Stop workflow
- Report the exact contradiction, missing prerequisite, or task-plan issue
- Suggest targeted follow-up with
/buildpad-spec-design {feature},/buildpad-spec-tasks {feature}, or manual edits depending on the finding
User Cancellation (Interactive Mode):
- Stop gracefully
- Show completed phases
- Suggest manual continuation
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

