swiftui-component-author
Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when creating or refactoring a reusable SwiftUI component. Do not use for business-specific screens, non-UI services, or design-token-only changes.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- apple-accessibility-reviewSkill
- apple-app-marketing-siteSkill
- apple-design-systemSkill
- apple-development-foundationSkill
- apple-error-statesSkill
- apple-platform-plannerSkill
- apple-security-privacy-reviewSkill
- codex-bootstrapSkill
- codex-skill-maintainerSkill
- ios-macos-platform-adaptationSkill
- maestro-apple-app-testingSkill
- reusable-code-extractorSkill
- swift-concurrency-reviewSkill
- swift-package-module-authorSkill
- swift-testing-verificationSkill
- swiftui-tab-navigationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Create or refactor a reusable SwiftUI component in the consumer workspace.
- Distinctive: line 13
Inspect first: Read existing design-system tokens, sibling components, and repository UI conventions.
- Distinctive: line 14
Prefer native controls: Use system controls and semantic configuration.
- Distinctive: line 15
Own state explicitly: Prefer initializer parameters and environment injection.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
SwiftUI component author
Create or refactor a reusable SwiftUI component in the consumer workspace. Do not implement business-specific screens or token-only design work with this skill.
Workflow
- Confirm scope. Name the responsibility, at least two plausible consumers, supported platforms, and the configuration surface (parameters, styles, sizes). Stop if the request is a one-off screen, feature flow, or design-token-only change — use the appropriate feature or
apple-design-systemskill instead. - Inspect first. Read existing design-system tokens, sibling components, and repository UI conventions. Prefer extending an existing component over forking a near-duplicate.
- Prefer native controls. Use system controls and semantic configuration. Avoid custom chrome that reimplements buttons, lists, or navigation unless the product requires it and accessibility parity is planned.
- Own state explicitly. Prefer initializer parameters and environment injection. Use native observation for shared app state. Do not introduce a view model without a state-ownership or testability reason written in the handoff.
- Accessibility baseline (required). Support Dynamic Type, VoiceOver labels/traits/grouping, keyboard and focus order where the platform has them, sufficient contrast, Reduce Motion, Differentiate Without Color, and a descriptive label for every icon-only control. Touch targets must remain usable (~44×44 pt). At large Dynamic Type sizes, allow scrolling by default and prioritize primary text growth so essential content is not clipped.
- Visual craft. Match SF Symbol weight and scale to adjacent text. Prefer frequency-gated, interruptible motion: critically damped defaults; bounce only after momentum; press feedback on touch-down; source-anchored sheets/menus when origin matters; never lock input during transitions. Never animate keyboard-initiated or other high-frequency paths (command palettes, shortcuts, rapid focus moves). Custom enter/exit transitions should use the same path. Prefer system transitions; avoid multi-second decorative choreography and motion that is the only affordance of meaning. Icon-only controls need a label and a usable hit area.
- Keep the public API small. Expose only configuration the consumers need. Document defaults and non-obvious parameters. Prefer semantic style enums over raw colors/fonts when tokens exist.
- Ship a preview or example that exercises primary configurations and at least one accessibility-sensitive case (for example large Dynamic Type or an empty state).
- Test what the component owns. Focused tests for configuration logic, state transitions, and public API contracts. Do not claim VoiceOver or visual polish passed without evidence — list manual checks.
Stop conditions
- Business-specific screen copy, navigation shell, or domain workflow → implement as a feature, not a “component.”
- Token or branding-only request →
apple-design-system. - Genuine iOS/macOS divergence in interaction → chain
ios-macos-platform-adaptation. - Planning-only request → deliver design + verification plan without writing product code.
Verification
Use swift-testing-verification and XcodeBuildMCP for the affected consumer target. Build the component’s host target; run focused tests. When the component is shared UI, follow with apple-accessibility-review before calling reusable work complete. If custom motion was added, confirm high-frequency/keyboard paths stay unanimated and Reduce Motion still provides non-motion feedback. Report residual risk for untested platforms and manual-only a11y checks.
Inputs: reusable component requirement and consumers. Output: a small documented component, self-contained preview/example, focused tests, and relevant build result. For planning-only requests, provide the component design and verification plan without implementation.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

