study
Skill74 starsChanged 38 days agoMITView on GitHub
Analyze the current codebase using Factory's observation engine and code graph. Generates a report covering code quality, eval scores, structural analysis, open issues, backlog items, observability coverage, and improvement opportunities. Use when the user wants to understand the state of their project before making changes.
20 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- halilural/imprimaturtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Sumit189/claude-codestheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Slava-code/slava-stacktheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- gradigit/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- JangInho/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- pp6235024-bit/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Other versions20 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- akashgit/remote-factory★ 74100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 19
- mordor-forge/study-skill★ 46same name
- flc1125/skills★ 38same name
- alexiocassanifm/anthropic-certifications★ 36same name
- SugarMGP/study.skill★ 13same name
- WahyuS002/skills★ 5same name
- WindyITS/skills★ 5same name
- froster02/mini-Brain_skills★ 4same name
- matvej-melikhov/karpathy-llm-wiki★ 2same name
- Sumit189/claude-codes★ 1same name
- TimCodes04/second-brain★ 1same name
9 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- factorySkill
- implementSkill
- pipelineSkill
- pipeline-subagentsSkill
- statusSkill
- workflow-design-v2Skill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 24
Check whether a code knowledge graph is available by running factory graph status "$(pwd)".
- Distinctive: line 26
If the graph is available (status shows node/edge counts), explore the code graph:
- Very specific: line 34
Write graph findings to .factory/strategy/graph-context.md, then combine:
- Very specific: line 57
After studying, use /factory:implement to act on the findings.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/factory:study
Analyze the current codebase and generate an observation report with structural graph analysis.
Prerequisites
command -v factory >/dev/null 2>&1 || uv tool install "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}"Execution
factory graph update "$(pwd)"
factory study "$(pwd)"Check whether a code knowledge graph is available by running factory graph status "$(pwd)".
If the graph is available (status shows node/edge counts), explore the code graph:
factory graph query "$(pwd)" "<focus from observations>" --depth 2
factory graph explain "$(pwd)" "<key node>"
factory graph path "$(pwd)" "<A>" "<B>"Write graph findings to .factory/strategy/graph-context.md, then combine:
cat .factory/strategy/observations.md .factory/strategy/graph-context.md \
> .factory/strategy/study-combined.mdThe combined report at .factory/strategy/study-combined.md covers:
- Eval scores — current composite and per-dimension breakdown
- Open issues — from GitHub, if available
- Backlog items — pending work from
.factory/strategy/backlog.md - Observability coverage — logging density and uninstrumented files
- Hypothesis budget — how many improvements to target this cycle
- Cross-project insights — patterns from sibling projects (if any)
- Structural analysis — key modules, dependency paths, architectural layers, entry points
For cross-project insights, pass --projects-dir:
factory study "$(pwd)" --projects-dir ~/factory-projectsAfter studying, use /factory:implement to act on the findings.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

