study
Skill0 starsChanged 29 days agoMITView on GitHub
Start or resume a study session on a digested source or a cross-cutting concept; appends one checkpoint at session end. Use when the user says: study X, walk me through paper Y, continue studying Z. Not for ordinary KB questions or brainstorming.
- Commits and pushes
20 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- halilural/imprimaturtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Sumit189/claude-codestheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- gradigit/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- JangInho/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- pp6235024-bit/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- akashgit/remote-factorytheir own version, first seen Oct 5, 2026
Other versions20 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 20
- akashgit/remote-factory★ 74same name
- boston-harness-group/remote-factory★ 74same name
- mordor-forge/study-skill★ 46same name
- flc1125/skills★ 38same name
- alexiocassanifm/anthropic-certifications★ 36same name
- SugarMGP/study.skill★ 13same name
- WahyuS002/skills★ 5same name
- WindyITS/skills★ 5same name
- froster02/mini-Brain_skills★ 4same name
- matvej-melikhov/karpathy-llm-wiki★ 2same name
10 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- add-entrySkill
- add-todoSkill
- complete-todoSkill
- deadlinesSkill
- financeSkill
- financial-summarySkill
- kb-add-folderSkill
- kb-archiveSkill
- kb-auditSkill
- kb-promoteSkill
- kbSkill
- kb-synthesizeSkill
- meetingSkill
- study-statusSkill
- study-unstudiedSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
9
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 34
If ambiguous, print candidates, ask user to pick
- Very specific: line 35
If zero matches: ask "this looks like a concept — create concepts/<slug>/?"
- Very specific: line 42
If yes → resume mode. Invoke /study-status internally to pull latest checkpoint summary.
- Distinctive: line 54
If no existing log → new session mode.
- Distinctive: line 70
Leave body empty (no placeholder checkpoint yet — the first real checkpoint is written at session end).
- Distinctive: line 77
Ask user to confirm concept slug + 1-paragraph definition scope.
- Distinctive: line 92
If user has questions → answer, then check in.
- Distinctive: line 94
If the session pulls in related sources → note them (they'll trigger the cross-ref write at session end).
- Distinctive: line 98
When user signals end-of-session ("that's enough for today", "let's wrap", "save it"):
- Very specific: line 133
Update its frontmatter last_checkpoint: to today.
- Very specific: line 141
Update referenced file's last_checkpoint: too.
- Very specific: line 142
Run python3 scripts/rebuild-indexes.py to refresh affected INDEX.md files.
- Very specific: line 143
Run python3 scripts/kb-lint.py to verify frontmatter.
- Distinctive: line 157
If user says "promote the [?question] to questions/" or similar:
- Distinctive: line 163
Never do this without explicit user ask.
- Very specific: line 177
If user drops off mid-session and returns later, another /study <same-slug> picks up via resume mode (§2).
- Distinctive: line 178
If session is cut short before end-of-session checkpoint, no durable write happens — learning is lost.
- Very specific: line 179
If the lock was acquired and session crashed, manual override: rm runs/.lock.
- Very specific: line 183
Not
/kb-synthesize: No architecture snapshots produced. - Distinctive: line 185
Not automated: No auto-promotion, no auto-cross-link-discovery beyond what user names in-session.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/study — Deep-study session on a source or concept
Opens an interactive study session. Teaches the material in chunks, appends one durable H2 checkpoint to the matching study-sessions/<filename>.md (for sources) or concepts/<slug>/study-log.md (for concepts) at session end.
Arguments
/study <source-slug>— study an existing source (filename prefix match insources/). Example:/study example-paper./study <concept-slug>— study a concept (folder underconcepts/). Example:/study example-concept. If the folder doesn't exist, prompts to create it./study next— invoke/study-unstudied, pick the top suggestion, confirm with user, proceed.--mode text|voice— renderer mode. Defaulttext. Voice mode = stub for v0 (shorter chunks, no tables, progressive disclosure). Retrieval is identical in both modes.
Required reading first time
- CONVENTIONS.md §"Study logs — checkpoint + cross-reference rules"
- study-sessions/README.md
- concepts/README.md
- schema/templates/study-log.md
- schema/templates/concept.md
Flow
1. Resolve target
Parse argument. Fuzzy-match if needed:
- First try exact filename match in
sources/(strip date prefix for user ergonomics):sources/*-<arg>-*.mdandsources/*-<arg>.md - Then try
concepts/<arg>/ - Then try slug-contains / tag-match / title-keyword across
sources/+concepts/ - If ambiguous, print candidates, ask user to pick
- If zero matches: ask "this looks like a concept — create
concepts/<slug>/?"
2. Check for existing study log
- Source session: does
study-sessions/<source-filename>.mdexist? - Concept session: does
concepts/<slug>/study-log.mdexist (and non-empty)?
If yes → resume mode. Invoke /study-status internally to pull latest checkpoint summary; open the session with:
Picking up from [[study-sessions/<X>]] §checkpoint-<N> (<date>):
- Last session intent: <next_session_intent from prior checkpoint>
- Open threads: <bullet list from prior Open threads section>
- Recent checkpoints (last 3): <...>
Continue this thread, or start a new angle?If no existing log → new session mode.
3. New session setup — source mode
- Acquire
runs/.lock(briefly, to create the study-log file). Write<session-id> <ISO-timestamp>to the lock. - Copy
schema/templates/study-log.md→study-sessions/<source-filename>.md. Fill frontmatter:title:"Study log — <source title>"type:study-logdescription:per template rule (≤120 chars, stable, no wikilinks)product:inherit from sourcesource:[[sources/<source-filename>]]brainstorm:[[brainstorming/<matching-brainstorm>]]if one exists, else omitdate_found:todaylast_checkpoint:todaystatus:ongoingtags:inherit from source
- Leave body empty (no placeholder checkpoint yet — the first real checkpoint is written at session end).
- Release the lock.
- Dispatch a subagent (Explore or general-purpose) to deep-read the source + matching brainstorm, return a teaching plan (2–4 main concepts to cover, 3–5 suggested questions to probe).
- Present the teaching plan to the user. Confirm before proceeding.
3b. New session setup — concept mode (concept folder doesn't exist)
- Ask user to confirm concept slug + 1-paragraph definition scope.
- Acquire
runs/.lock. - Create
concepts/<slug>/directory. - Copy
schema/templates/concept.md→concepts/<slug>/README.md. - Dispatch a subagent to run the initial concept research:
- Grep the KB for sources/brainstorms/decisions/questions/comparisons touching this concept
- Web-search for 5–10 authoritative external signals (papers/articles/projects)
- Return a draft
README.mdbody (definition + KB signals + external signals + scoping question)
- Present the draft to the user. User confirms or edits. Finalize
README.md. - Copy
schema/templates/study-log.md→concepts/<slug>/study-log.md. Fill frontmatter withconcept: [[concepts/<slug>]](nosource:). - Release the lock. Proceed to teach.
4. Teach in chunks (progressive disclosure)
- One concept at a time. Explain, then confirm: "got it? or want to push on this?"
- If user has questions → answer, then check in.
- User may say "make this a question" or "draft a decision" mid-session → prompted promotion only: pick up the relevant text, invoke
/add-entryfor the right type, append the new artifact's wikilink under "Artifacts created this session" in the draft checkpoint. Never auto-create. - If the session pulls in related sources → note them (they'll trigger the cross-ref write at session end).
5. End-of-session checkpoint — draft + user confirm
When user signals end-of-session ("that's enough for today", "let's wrap", "save it"):
Draft a checkpoint block following schema/templates/study-log.md:
## Checkpoint — <YYYY-MM-DD> (session <N>)
**What we covered**
- <bullet>
**What I now understand**
- <delta>
**Candidate questions / decisions** (flagged, not created)
- [?question] <tag>
- [?decision] <tag>
**Related sources touched**
- [[study-sessions/<other>]] §checkpoint-<M> — <one-line note>
**Open threads → next session**
- <resume hint>Rules:
- Full sentences, not shorthand — voice-portability
[?question]/[?decision]tags inline, only for candidates user flagged or for ones the agent is surfacing with explicit user acknowledgement- Never promote tags to
questions//decisions/automatically. If user already asked to promote mid-session, that happened then; don't re-promote from tags at end.
Show draft to user. Wait for confirm or edits.
6. Write + cross-refs + commit
- Acquire
runs/.lock. - Append the confirmed checkpoint to the primary study-log file.
- Update its frontmatter
last_checkpoint:to today. - For each entry in "Related sources touched":
- Append a short reciprocal checkpoint to the referenced study-log file (create it first if it doesn't exist — same new-session-setup, skip teaching):
## Cross-ref — <YYYY-MM-DD> (from [[study-sessions/<primary>]] session <N>) Touched briefly: <one-sentence angle>. Full context in <primary> checkpoint <N>. No primary study progress here. - Update referenced file's
last_checkpoint:too.
- Append a short reciprocal checkpoint to the referenced study-log file (create it first if it doesn't exist — same new-session-setup, skip teaching):
- Run
python3 scripts/rebuild-indexes.pyto refresh affected INDEX.md files. - Run
python3 scripts/kb-lint.pyto verify frontmatter. - Stage all modified files. Commit with prefix
study::- Source session:
study: checkpoint <source-slug> session <N> - Concept first session:
study: seed concept <slug> + session 1 - Concept later session:
study: checkpoint <slug> session <N>
- Source session:
git push.- Release the lock.
7. Close
Brief confirmation to user: "session <N> logged to [[study-sessions/<X>]] §checkpoint-<N>. Cross-refs written to: <list>. Next session intent: <repeat from checkpoint>."
Promotion (user-prompted only)
If user says "promote the [?question] to questions/" or similar:
- Find the tagged line (grep
[?question]or[?decision]in the relevant checkpoint) - Extract the text after the tag
- Invoke
/add-entryfor typequestionordecision— let that skill handle template + frontmatter - In the question/decision body, add
## Relatedsection with[[<source-study-log>]] §checkpoint-<N>as the provenance pointer - Append to the session's checkpoint under a new section
**Artifacts created this session**with the new wikilink + short "why now" gloss - Never do this without explicit user ask.
Voice mode stub
--mode voice today:
- Suppress markdown tables (not dictation-friendly)
- Replace wikilink render with natural phrasing: "the
<source>study log checkpoint 2" instead of "double-bracket study dash sessions slash..." - Chunk explanations smaller (1–2 sentences per chunk, explicit "continue?" prompts)
- Retrieval identical to text mode
Full voice renderer deferred until real walk sessions surface needs.
Interruption handling
- If user drops off mid-session and returns later, another
/study <same-slug>picks up via resume mode (§2). - If session is cut short before end-of-session checkpoint, no durable write happens — learning is lost. Design tradeoff: simpler state machine over interruption-safety. If this becomes painful in practice, add mid-session draft saves.
- If the lock was acquired and session crashed, manual override:
rm runs/.lock.
What /study is NOT
- Not
/kb-synthesize. No architecture snapshots produced. - Not
/add-entrywith a brainstorm. Opinions about project-angle belong inbrainstorming/. Study logs capture learning process. - Not automated. No auto-promotion, no auto-cross-link-discovery beyond what user names in-session.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

