agentleFS
bismillahinspiringquotes-engbismillahinspiringquotes-eng/claude-code-kit/skills/seo-content-audit/SKILL.md

seo-content-audit

Skill14 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when auditing a website's content/markup for on-page SEO basics — title tags, meta descriptions, heading hierarchy, image alt text, internal linking, structured data presence, sitemap correctness. Stack-agnostic; examples reference common Next.js patterns but apply to any web framework.

7 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Every public page has a title tag (visible in browser tab + Google search result).

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    Every public page has a meta description.

    line 26
  3. Very specific:

    No use of headings for visual styling (e.g.

    line 38
  4. Very specific:

    Every <img> or <Image> tag has a meaningful alt attribute.

    line 43
  5. Distinctive:

    Run a quick crawl: are there pages that no other page links to (orphan pages)?

    line 53
  6. Distinctive:

    Don't recommend installing SEO plugins (Yoast, RankMath) — those are WordPress-specific.

    line 101
  7. Distinctive:

    Don't dump generic "SEO best practices" — only call out what's actually wrong in THIS codebase.

    line 102
  8. Distinctive:

    If audit takes more than 10 minutes of file reading, sample a representative subset (5-10 pages across page types) and note that in the …

    line 103

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

SEO audit — on-page content

You're auditing a website for the 7 most common on-page SEO mistakes. These directly affect rankings and click-through rate.

For multilocale-specific issues (hreflang, language alternates), use the seo-audit-multilocale skill instead — this one assumes single-language or covers single-language aspects.

The 7 checks

1. Title tag — missing, wrong length, or generic

What to check:

  • Every public page has a title tag (visible in browser tab + Google search result).
  • Length: 50-60 characters ideal. Under 30 = wasted opportunity. Over 70 = truncated in search results.
  • Each page has a UNIQUE title. Grep all title: in metadata files — duplicates = SEO confusion.
  • Includes the primary keyword for that page (not stuffed, just present).
  • For Next.js: check metadata exports or generateMetadata functions in route files.

2. Meta description — missing or generic

What to check:

  • Every public page has a meta description.
  • Length: 140-160 characters. Under 100 = thin. Over 170 = truncated.
  • Each page has a UNIQUE description.
  • It actually describes the page content (not the site tagline copy-pasted everywhere).
  • Includes a soft call-to-action when appropriate ("Learn how to...", "Discover...", "Book now").

3. Heading hierarchy broken

What to check:

  • Each page has exactly ONE <h1>. Grep template files; verify.
  • Heading order makes sense: h1 > h2 > h3 — don't jump from h1 straight to h4.
  • The h1 matches user search intent and contains the primary keyword.
  • No use of headings for visual styling (e.g. h3 for a small bold sentence) — use CSS for that.

4. Image alt text missing or auto-generated junk

What to check:

  • Every <img> or <Image> tag has a meaningful alt attribute.
  • Alt text describes what's IN the image, in context. "boat-1.jpg" or "" = useless.
  • Decorative images (purely visual flourish) should have alt="" (empty), not be missing entirely.
  • For Next.js: every next/image import should have alt prop set per usage.

5. Internal linking sparse or broken

What to check:

  • Each public page has at least 2-3 internal links to related content.
  • Anchor text is descriptive ("see our Komodo guide"), not generic ("click here", "read more").
  • Run a quick crawl: are there pages that no other page links to (orphan pages)? Those rank poorly.
  • Are there broken internal links (pointing to deleted pages)? Test a sample.

6. Structured data (JSON-LD) missing for content types

What to check:

  • For pages of type Article: JSON-LD with @type: "Article", including author, datePublished, headline, image.
  • For pages of type Product / Tour / Service: corresponding schema.
  • For homepage: Organization schema with logo, contact, social.
  • For navigation breadcrumbs: BreadcrumbList schema.
  • Validate at https://search.google.com/test/rich-results for any sample page.

7. Sitemap.xml + robots.txt issues

What to check:

  • Sitemap exists at /sitemap.xml. For Next.js: usually app/sitemap.ts.
  • Sitemap includes ALL public pages, not just static ones — dynamic routes (articles, products) must be listed too.
  • Sitemap entries have lastModified dates that update when content changes.
  • robots.txt at /robots.txt. For Next.js: app/robots.ts.
  • robots.txt does NOT block important pages. Common mistake: leftover Disallow: / from staging deployment.
  • Sitemap URL is referenced from robots.txt: Sitemap: https://example.com/sitemap.xml.

How to deliver the report

# On-page SEO audit — [site name]

## Coverage
- Pages audited: N
- Pages with missing title: N
- Pages with missing meta description: N
- Pages with broken heading hierarchy: N
- Images without alt text: N

## Critical issues
1. [issue] — Pages affected: [list or count]. Evidence: [file:line]. Fix: [concrete step].

## Warnings
[same format]

## Verified clean
- [check]

End with: "Critical: [N], warnings: [N]. Mau gue bantu fix yang highest-impact (biasanya title tags + JSON-LD), atau lo review dulu?"

Constraints

  • Don't recommend installing SEO plugins (Yoast, RankMath) — those are WordPress-specific. The kit's audience uses code-first frameworks.
  • Don't dump generic "SEO best practices" — only call out what's actually wrong in THIS codebase.
  • If audit takes more than 10 minutes of file reading, sample a representative subset (5-10 pages across page types) and note that in the report.
  • Cite file paths + line numbers for every finding.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.