close-out-ml-experiment
Skill7 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub
Preserves positive or negative ML experiment evidence, reconciles report discrepancies, records the canonical decision and limitations, and prepares a concise handoff. Use when stopping an experiment, rejecting a prompt/model, or freezing a result before the next iteration.
In this repository30 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- apple-cktool-jsSkill
- apple-cktoolSkill
- audit-training-experimentSkill
- awkSkill
- compare-models-blindlySkill
- conventional-commitsSkill
- design-resumable-model-evaluationSkill
- gogopowermanagerSkill
- ios-design-reviewSkill
- mikrotik-routerosSkill
- obsidian-dailySkill
- orbstack-cliSkill
- package-private-ml-artifactsSkill
- prepare-training-corpusSkill
- proxmox-adminSkill
- review-ios-ui-apple-higSkill
- review-training-data-qualitySkill
- run-hugging-face-training-smokeSkill
- sedSkill
- select-and-verify-best-checkpointSkill
- send-to-minionSkill
- swift-reviewSkill
- technical-writerSkill
- tmuxinatorSkill
- topydoSkill
- unhobble-agent-contextSkill
- validate-structured-model-outputSkill
- write-a-promptSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Stop active inference or training when requested, but preserve completed outputs.
- Distinctive: line 36
Do not claim model, product, strategic, human, device, energy, or production acceptance from narrower evidence.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Close Out ML Experiment
End the experiment without erasing what it taught.
Freeze evidence first
Stop active inference or training when requested, but preserve completed outputs. Do not regenerate, relabel, overwrite, move, or reinterpret raw evidence. Hash baseline and final artifacts and verify expected files before editing summaries.
Inventory:
- corpus, manifests, provenance, and exact splits;
- commands, configs, prompts, schemas, revisions, and seeds;
- logs, checkpoints, adapters, raw/normalized outputs, latency, and validator results;
- blinded packets, both judging passes, identity mappings, and reports.
Reconcile the record
Recalculate inexpensive totals from per-case artifacts. If a report omits a category or case, preserve its measured values and add a clearly named correction or addendum. Explain the discrepancy; do not rewrite history or rerun inference to make totals agree.
Record the decision
State:
- what changed and what stayed canonical;
- exact result deltas and hard safety failures;
- passed, failed, untested, and not-applicable gates;
- dataset and judging limitations;
- whether the evidence is a smoke, automated evaluation, model-as-judge review, or human study;
- the smallest justified next experiment or fix.
Do not claim model, product, strategic, human, device, energy, or production acceptance from narrower evidence.
Hand off durably
Write a concise reproducible report beside the experiment evidence. If the project uses an issue tracker, add one high-signal comment with decision, metrics, artifact locations/hashes, limitations, and next step. Keep broader qualification issues open when only one subexperiment ended. Commit only explicitly authorized, scoped source or documentation changes; never commit credentials, datasets, weights, checkpoints, adapters, or unrelated files.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

