openclaw-search
Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Intelligent search for agents. Multi-source retrieval with confidence scoring - web, academic, and Tavily in one unified API. Use when: the user needs web search, research, source discovery, or content extraction.
- Reads credentials
- Sends data out
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Tgoldi/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- Tgoldi/claude-skills★ 095% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- aisa-multi-search-engineSkill
- aisa-providerSkill
- aisa-tavilySkill
- aisa-twitter-apiSkill
- aisa-twitter-command-centerSkill
- aisa-twitter-engagement-suiteSkill
- aisa-twitter-post-engageSkill
- aisa-youtube-searchSkill
- aisa-youtube-serp-scoutSkill
- cn-llmSkill
- crypto-market-dataSkill
- gmail-lead-deskSkill
- kol-creator-discoverySkill
- last30daysSkill
- last30days-zhSkill
- llm-routerSkill
- marketpulseSkill
- marketSkill
- media-genSkill
- multi-searchSkill
- multi-source-searchSkill
- notion-workspaceSkill
- openclaw-aisa-youtube-aisaSkill
- openclaw-media-genSkill
- openclaw-twitter-post-engageSkill
- openclaw-twitterSkill
- openclaw-youtubeSkill
- perplexity-researchSkill
- perplexity-searchSkill
- prediction-market-arbitrage-apiSkill
- prediction-market-arbitrageSkill
- prediction-market-arbitrage-zhSkill
- prediction-market-dataSkill
- prediction-market-data-zhSkill
- prediction-marketSkill
- saas-gatewaySkill
- scholar-searchSkill
- searchSkill
- seo-keyword-researchSkill
- smart-searchSkill
- stock-analysisSkill
- stock-dividendSkill
- stock-hotSkill
- stock-portfolioSkill
- stock-rumorsSkill
- stock-watchlistSkill
- tavily-extractSkill
- tavily-searchSkill
- trend-forecastSkill
- twitter-autopilotSkill
- twitter-command-center-search-post-interactSkill
- twitter-command-center-search-postSkill
- twitterSkill
- us-stock-analystSkill
- web-searchSkill
- x-intelligence-automationSkill
- youtube-searchSkill
- youtube-serpSkill
- youtubeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 73
Use AIsa Explain to perform meta-analysis on search results, generating:
- Very specific: line 339
Every response includes usage.cost and usage.credits_remaining.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Search 🔍
Intelligent search for autonomous agents. Powered by AIsa.
One API key. Multi-source retrieval. Confidence-scored answers.
Inspired by AIsa Verity - A next-generation search agent with trust-scored answers.
🔥 What Can You Do?
Research Assistant
"Search for the latest papers on transformer architectures from 2024-2025"Market Research
"Find all web articles about AI startup funding in Q4 2025"Competitive Analysis
"Search for reviews and comparisons of RAG frameworks"News Aggregation
"Get the latest news about quantum computing breakthroughs"Deep Dive Research
"Smart search combining web and academic sources on 'autonomous agents'"Quick Start
export AISA_API_KEY="your-key"🏗️ Architecture: Multi-Stage Orchestration
OpenClaw Search employs a Two-Phase Retrieval Strategy for comprehensive results:
Phase 1: Discovery (Parallel Retrieval)
Query 4 distinct search streams simultaneously:
- Scholar: Deep academic retrieval
- Web: Structured web search
- Smart: Intelligent mixed-mode search
- Tavily: External validation signal
Phase 2: Reasoning (Meta-Analysis)
Use AIsa Explain to perform meta-analysis on search results, generating:
- Confidence scores (0-100)
- Source agreement analysis
- Synthesized answers
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ User Query │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
┌───────────────┼───────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ Scholar │ │ Web │ │ Smart │
└─────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘
│ │ │
└───────────────┼───────────────┘
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ AIsa Explain │
│ (Meta-Analysis) │
└─────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ Confidence Score│
│ + Synthesis │
└─────────────────┘Core Capabilities
Web Search
# Basic web search
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/scholar/search/web?query=AI+frameworks&max_num_results=10" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY"
# Full text search (with page content)
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/search/full?query=latest+AI+news&max_num_results=10" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY"Academic/Scholar Search
# Search academic papers
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/scholar/search/scholar?query=transformer+models&max_num_results=10" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY"
# With year filter
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/scholar/search/scholar?query=LLM&max_num_results=10&as_ylo=2024&as_yhi=2025" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY"Smart Search (Web + Academic Combined)
# Intelligent hybrid search
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/scholar/search/smart?query=machine+learning+optimization&max_num_results=10" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY"Tavily Integration (Advanced)
# Tavily search
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/tavily/search" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"query":"latest AI developments"}'
# Extract content from URLs
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/tavily/extract" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"urls":["https://example.com/article"]}'
# Crawl web pages
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/tavily/crawl" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"url":"https://example.com","max_depth":2}'
# Site map
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/tavily/map" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"url":"https://example.com"}'Explain Search Results (Meta-Analysis)
# Generate explanations with confidence scoring
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/scholar/explain" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"results":[...],"language":"en","format":"summary"}'📊 Confidence Scoring Engine
Unlike standard RAG systems, OpenClaw Search evaluates credibility and consensus:
Scoring Rubric
| Factor | Weight | Description |
| Source Quality | 40% | Academic > Smart/Web > External |
| Agreement Analysis | 35% | Cross-source consensus checking |
| Recency | 15% | Newer sources weighted higher |
| Relevance | 10% | Query-result semantic match |
Score Interpretation
| Score | Confidence Level | Meaning |
| 90-100 | Very High | Strong consensus across academic and web sources |
| 70-89 | High | Good agreement, reliable sources |
| 50-69 | Medium | Mixed signals, verify independently |
| 30-49 | Low | Conflicting sources, use caution |
| 0-29 | Very Low | Insufficient or contradictory data |
Python Client
# Web search
python3 scripts/search_client.py web --query "latest AI news" --count 10
# Academic search
python3 scripts/search_client.py scholar --query "transformer architecture" --count 10
python3 scripts/search_client.py scholar --query "LLM" --year-from 2024 --year-to 2025
# Smart search (web + academic)
python3 scripts/search_client.py smart --query "autonomous agents" --count 10
# Full text search
python3 scripts/search_client.py full --query "AI startup funding"
# Tavily operations
python3 scripts/search_client.py tavily-search --query "AI developments"
python3 scripts/search_client.py tavily-extract --urls "https://example.com/article"
# Multi-source search with confidence scoring
python3 scripts/search_client.py verity --query "Is quantum computing ready for enterprise?"API Endpoints Reference
| Endpoint | Method | Description |
/scholar/search/web | POST | Web search with structured results |
/scholar/search/scholar | POST | Academic paper search |
/scholar/search/smart | POST | Intelligent hybrid search |
/scholar/explain | POST | Generate result explanations |
/search/full | POST | Full text search with content |
/search/smart | POST | Smart web search |
/tavily/search | POST | Tavily search integration |
/tavily/extract | POST | Extract content from URLs |
/tavily/crawl | POST | Crawl web pages |
/tavily/map | POST | Generate site maps |
Search Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Description |
| query | string | Search query (required) |
| max_num_results | integer | Max results (1-100, default 10) |
| as_ylo | integer | Year lower bound (scholar only) |
| as_yhi | integer | Year upper bound (scholar only) |
🚀 Building a Verity-Style Agent
Want to build your own confidence-scored search agent? Here's the pattern:
1. Parallel Discovery
import asyncio
async def discover(query):
"""Phase 1: Parallel retrieval from multiple sources."""
tasks = [
search_scholar(query),
search_web(query),
search_smart(query),
search_tavily(query)
]
results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)
return {
"scholar": results[0],
"web": results[1],
"smart": results[2],
"tavily": results[3]
}2. Confidence Scoring
def score_confidence(results):
"""Calculate deterministic confidence score."""
score = 0
# Source quality (40%)
if results["scholar"]:
score += 40 * len(results["scholar"]) / 10
# Agreement analysis (35%)
claims = extract_claims(results)
agreement = analyze_agreement(claims)
score += 35 * agreement
# Recency (15%)
recency = calculate_recency(results)
score += 15 * recency
# Relevance (10%)
relevance = calculate_relevance(results, query)
score += 10 * relevance
return min(100, score)3. Synthesis
async def synthesize(query, results, score):
"""Generate final answer with citations."""
explanation = await explain_results(results)
return {
"answer": explanation["summary"],
"confidence": score,
"sources": explanation["citations"],
"claims": explanation["claims"]
}For a complete implementation, see AIsa Verity.
Pricing
| API | Cost |
| Web search | ~$0.001 |
| Scholar search | ~$0.002 |
| Smart search | ~$0.002 |
| Tavily search | ~$0.002 |
| Explain | ~$0.003 |
Every response includes usage.cost and usage.credits_remaining.
Get Started
- Sign up at aisa.one
- Get your API key
- Add credits (pay-as-you-go)
- Set environment variable:
export AISA_API_KEY="your-key"
Full API Reference
See API Reference for complete endpoint documentation.
Resources
- AIsa Verity - Reference implementation of confidence-scored search agent
- AIsa Documentation - Complete API documentation
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

