agentleFS
baofeng-techbaofeng-tech/agent-skills-so/openclaw-search/SKILL.md

openclaw-search

Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Intelligent search for agents. Multi-source retrieval with confidence scoring - web, academic, and Tavily in one unified API. Use when: the user needs web search, research, source discovery, or content extraction.

  • Reads credentials
  • Sends data out

1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use AIsa Explain to perform meta-analysis on search results, generating:

    line 73
  2. Very specific:

    Every response includes usage.cost and usage.credits_remaining.

    line 339

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Search 🔍

Intelligent search for autonomous agents. Powered by AIsa.

One API key. Multi-source retrieval. Confidence-scored answers.

Inspired by AIsa Verity - A next-generation search agent with trust-scored answers.

🔥 What Can You Do?

Research Assistant

"Search for the latest papers on transformer architectures from 2024-2025"

Market Research

"Find all web articles about AI startup funding in Q4 2025"

Competitive Analysis

"Search for reviews and comparisons of RAG frameworks"

News Aggregation

"Get the latest news about quantum computing breakthroughs"

Deep Dive Research

"Smart search combining web and academic sources on 'autonomous agents'"

Quick Start

export AISA_API_KEY="your-key"

🏗️ Architecture: Multi-Stage Orchestration

OpenClaw Search employs a Two-Phase Retrieval Strategy for comprehensive results:

Phase 1: Discovery (Parallel Retrieval)

Query 4 distinct search streams simultaneously:

  • Scholar: Deep academic retrieval
  • Web: Structured web search
  • Smart: Intelligent mixed-mode search
  • Tavily: External validation signal

Phase 2: Reasoning (Meta-Analysis)

Use AIsa Explain to perform meta-analysis on search results, generating:

  • Confidence scores (0-100)
  • Source agreement analysis
  • Synthesized answers
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                      User Query                              │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                              │
              ┌───────────────┼───────────────┐
              ▼               ▼               ▼
        ┌─────────┐     ┌─────────┐     ┌─────────┐
        │ Scholar │     │   Web   │     │  Smart  │
        └─────────┘     └─────────┘     └─────────┘
              │               │               │
              └───────────────┼───────────────┘
                              ▼
                    ┌─────────────────┐
                    │  AIsa Explain   │
                    │ (Meta-Analysis) │
                    └─────────────────┘
                              │
                              ▼
                    ┌─────────────────┐
                    │ Confidence Score│
                    │  + Synthesis    │
                    └─────────────────┘

Core Capabilities

Web Search

# Basic web search
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/scholar/search/web?query=AI+frameworks&max_num_results=10" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY"

# Full text search (with page content)
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/search/full?query=latest+AI+news&max_num_results=10" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY"

Academic/Scholar Search

# Search academic papers
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/scholar/search/scholar?query=transformer+models&max_num_results=10" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY"

# With year filter
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/scholar/search/scholar?query=LLM&max_num_results=10&as_ylo=2024&as_yhi=2025" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY"

Smart Search (Web + Academic Combined)

# Intelligent hybrid search
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/scholar/search/smart?query=machine+learning+optimization&max_num_results=10" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY"

Tavily Integration (Advanced)

# Tavily search
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/tavily/search" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"query":"latest AI developments"}'

# Extract content from URLs
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/tavily/extract" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"urls":["https://example.com/article"]}'

# Crawl web pages
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/tavily/crawl" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"url":"https://example.com","max_depth":2}'

# Site map
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/tavily/map" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"url":"https://example.com"}'

Explain Search Results (Meta-Analysis)

# Generate explanations with confidence scoring
curl -X POST "https://api.aisa.one/apis/v1/scholar/explain" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AISA_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"results":[...],"language":"en","format":"summary"}'

📊 Confidence Scoring Engine

Unlike standard RAG systems, OpenClaw Search evaluates credibility and consensus:

Scoring Rubric

FactorWeightDescription
Source Quality40%Academic > Smart/Web > External
Agreement Analysis35%Cross-source consensus checking
Recency15%Newer sources weighted higher
Relevance10%Query-result semantic match

Score Interpretation

ScoreConfidence LevelMeaning
90-100Very HighStrong consensus across academic and web sources
70-89HighGood agreement, reliable sources
50-69MediumMixed signals, verify independently
30-49LowConflicting sources, use caution
0-29Very LowInsufficient or contradictory data

Python Client

# Web search
python3 scripts/search_client.py web --query "latest AI news" --count 10

# Academic search
python3 scripts/search_client.py scholar --query "transformer architecture" --count 10
python3 scripts/search_client.py scholar --query "LLM" --year-from 2024 --year-to 2025

# Smart search (web + academic)
python3 scripts/search_client.py smart --query "autonomous agents" --count 10

# Full text search
python3 scripts/search_client.py full --query "AI startup funding"

# Tavily operations
python3 scripts/search_client.py tavily-search --query "AI developments"
python3 scripts/search_client.py tavily-extract --urls "https://example.com/article"

# Multi-source search with confidence scoring
python3 scripts/search_client.py verity --query "Is quantum computing ready for enterprise?"

API Endpoints Reference

EndpointMethodDescription
/scholar/search/webPOSTWeb search with structured results
/scholar/search/scholarPOSTAcademic paper search
/scholar/search/smartPOSTIntelligent hybrid search
/scholar/explainPOSTGenerate result explanations
/search/fullPOSTFull text search with content
/search/smartPOSTSmart web search
/tavily/searchPOSTTavily search integration
/tavily/extractPOSTExtract content from URLs
/tavily/crawlPOSTCrawl web pages
/tavily/mapPOSTGenerate site maps

Search Parameters

ParameterTypeDescription
querystringSearch query (required)
max_num_resultsintegerMax results (1-100, default 10)
as_ylointegerYear lower bound (scholar only)
as_yhiintegerYear upper bound (scholar only)

🚀 Building a Verity-Style Agent

Want to build your own confidence-scored search agent? Here's the pattern:

1. Parallel Discovery

import asyncio

async def discover(query):
    """Phase 1: Parallel retrieval from multiple sources."""
    tasks = [
        search_scholar(query),
        search_web(query),
        search_smart(query),
        search_tavily(query)
    ]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)
    return {
        "scholar": results[0],
        "web": results[1],
        "smart": results[2],
        "tavily": results[3]
    }

2. Confidence Scoring

def score_confidence(results):
    """Calculate deterministic confidence score."""
    score = 0
    
    # Source quality (40%)
    if results["scholar"]:
        score += 40 * len(results["scholar"]) / 10
    
    # Agreement analysis (35%)
    claims = extract_claims(results)
    agreement = analyze_agreement(claims)
    score += 35 * agreement
    
    # Recency (15%)
    recency = calculate_recency(results)
    score += 15 * recency
    
    # Relevance (10%)
    relevance = calculate_relevance(results, query)
    score += 10 * relevance
    
    return min(100, score)

3. Synthesis

async def synthesize(query, results, score):
    """Generate final answer with citations."""
    explanation = await explain_results(results)
    return {
        "answer": explanation["summary"],
        "confidence": score,
        "sources": explanation["citations"],
        "claims": explanation["claims"]
    }

For a complete implementation, see AIsa Verity.


Pricing

APICost
Web search~$0.001
Scholar search~$0.002
Smart search~$0.002
Tavily search~$0.002
Explain~$0.003

Every response includes usage.cost and usage.credits_remaining.


Get Started

  1. Sign up at aisa.one
  2. Get your API key
  3. Add credits (pay-as-you-go)
  4. Set environment variable: export AISA_API_KEY="your-key"

Full API Reference

See API Reference for complete endpoint documentation.

Resources

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.