game
Skill6 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use for a study game, a fun way to drill for an exam, or typed practice that proves they know it. Not game development. Decks go to flashcards; tests to assess.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- wubinKKK/private-ai-workbenchtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- wormholeportal/Makonetheir own version, first seen Sep 5, 2026
- Codoop/codoop-flowcabintheir own version, first seen Aug 1, 2026
- muxammadmamajonov/dot-claudetheir own version, first seen Jul 6, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- wormholeportal/Makone★ 27same name
- wubinKKK/private-ai-workbench★ 4same name
- Codoop/codoop-flowcabin★ 0same name
- muxammadmamajonov/dot-claude★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- myelinateSkill
- assessSkill
- assignmentSkill
- codeSkill
- course-projectSkill
- find-mediaSkill
- flashcardsSkill
- labSkill
- memory-hooksSkill
- myelinateSkill
- notesSkill
- printSkill
- projectSkill
- study-planSkill
- teachSkill
- tutorSkill
- verifySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 12
Stand down when it isn't wanted: If memory or the person says not to use Myelinate for this subject or kind of request, skip this skill's …
- Distinctive: line 19
Scope comes from the source: Read the study guide itself before listing what to memorize.
- Very specific: line 22
Rewards stay tied to retrieval: No penalty for leaving, no daily streak, no prompt to keep playing past a break.
- Distinctive: line 35
Every formula gets a tier, units and a source:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Game
A typed retrieval game for an exam or a defined scope. It stays fun by keeping the learner producing answers quickly, with a visible payoff for each one. The fun serves retrieval: every point comes from an unaided answer, and nothing rewards time on the page.
Paths like references/… and templates/… are relative to this skill's folder, which carries its own copy of every file it names. Other Myelinate skills are siblings (../tutor/SKILL.md) and are installed as their own skills too. If a file is missing, the router's "Missing files" note says where to fetch it, and the rules below still apply.
Stand down when it isn't wanted. If memory or the person says not to use Myelinate for this subject or kind of request, skip this skill's method and answer plainly; a slash command brings it back.
Evidence and limits: the method is retrieval, spacing, interleaving and successive relearning (references/evidence.md). No study has tested this game. Never say it raises grades or that a learner is ready; report what they did.
0. Rules that override everything else
- Never for graded work. The page source holds every answer. Use
assignmentfor graded items. A worksheet, prelab or problem set counts as graded until they say otherwise (router rule 13). A practice set the instructor gave out for exam review is fine. When you decline, don't stop to ask which route they want: in the same reply, load../assignment/SKILL.mdand start teaching the first idea on a parallel problem with different numbers, then hand them their own problem to try. - Scope comes from the source. Read the study guide itself before listing what to memorize. See §1.
- One engine. Copy
templates/exam-game.htmland replace only the JSON. Don't hand-build a game page. - Cleared is not ready. Show items cleared, attempts and practice scores. No readiness percent and no predicted grade (router rule 11).
- Rewards stay tied to retrieval. No penalty for leaving, no daily streak, no prompt to keep playing past a break. The engine suggests a break after
breakMinutes. Keep bonuses cosmetic. Bright flashes, particles and busy motion stay out unless the learner asks for them. - The learner's own content stays private. Course material and learner games never go into this repository.
1. Read the scope
- Get the study guide, the exam format and the practice sets. Read each one fully, from the file itself.
- Formatting can carry the rule. Red or blue text, highlights and boxes often mark "memorize" and "provided". Text extraction drops them, so look at a rendered page or read the file's run colors, and quote the legend.
- List from the primary source, never from a summary of it, such as an older deck or chat. If you only have a summary, say so and offer to check the source.
- Save a study packet as soon as you've read the source: the scope, the formula tiers, the exam format and every practice question as text, in a file or the learner record. Screenshots can drop out of context, and re-reading a course site costs far more than the save.
- Count before you state a total. Write the list, count it, then write the sentence.
2. Formula tiers
Every formula gets a tier, units and a source:
memorize: the exam does not provide it. These form the gate.know: the guide asks for the skill but doesn't mark the formula.provided: on the exam. Drill when to use it and what each term means, including when the exam prints formulas without names.
Put units on each one. unitsFrom is source when the course states them and derived when you worked them out; the page labels derived units. If the learner wants to hand-write cards, show all tiers inline with show_widget or the host's equivalent, rendered as math, grouped by tier.
3. Fill in the JSON
Top level: title, subtitle, source, settings, theme, exam, formulas, topics.
settings:recheckHours(default 8, so an evening session rechecks the next morning),bonusChance,breakMinutes,mockTarget. SetmockTargetonly when the learner names a target.theme:score,goal,right(a few short praise lines) andwrong. Take these from the subject's world; a population ecology game can use N, K and "Population crash".exam:formatin the instructor's words, thenquick,math(item ids) andfree, in the same mix as the real test.- Formula:
id,name,tier,lhs,rhs,alts,units,unitsFrom,hook,src,obj, optionalsvg,caseSensitive, and, for amemorizeformula,apply, one math item that uses it. Drillprovidedandknowformulas with topic items. Answers are compared by value, soaltsneeds only forms with different symbols, such asN_0 R_0^tbesideN_0 R^t. SetcaseSensitive: truewhen case changes the meaning, such as R and r. - Topic:
id,name,sub,brief(a 60-second list), optionalsvg,items. - Item, all types:
id,type,q,src,obj(the guide objective),why, optionalneed,svg,table.term:answers, andnearfor close wrong answers (afferentforefferent). Only long words get one typo of grace, and only with the same first letter.sort:options,answer(index). Recognition is weaker than recall, so never let sort items be the only check of an objective.num:answerfor a fixed problem, orvars,exprand{name}/{=expr}inqandwhyfor new numbers each time. Prefer new numbers so answers can't be memorized. Also include each ungraded class problem as a fixed item.free:rubric(min,pointsoflabelandpattern) andmodel. Key-word matching is a practice aid, never a grade;assessandprintown real grading.
Math in text goes between $ signs in plain typed form: $N_0 e^(rt)$, $(K-N)/K$, $n_{t+1}$, $dN/dt$. A denominator is one symbol unless it's in parentheses: a/(bc). Write a money sign as \$. Draw any svg from the actual equation or data, with its answer out of its labels and title. Serialize with a real JSON library and write every < as \u003c.
4. Coverage and checks
Every guide objective gets at least one production item (term, num, free or formula), through the coverage map in references/production-lessons.md. Work every answer with code. Then open the page and run gameAudit(). Don't deliver until ok is true and each objective in the guide appears under objectives. It reports missing sources or units, formulas whose alts miss their own rhs or can't be typed, an apply that won't run, model answers that fail their own rubric, bad sort answers, numbers that don't compute or display, raw TeX, text mistaken for math, and objectives covered only by sort items. It can't judge whether content is right. With no browser, say the audit didn't run and name what's unchecked. Then play one card of each type at phone width and in dark mode, including one wrong answer. Say exactly what you ran.
5. Delivery
Publish it where the learner can return. The gate and the delayed recheck need saved progress, which lives in that browser's local storage, on that device. Some artifact sandboxes block it. Open the page where it will live and read progressSaves from gameAudit(): if it's false, deliver the HTML file instead and say why, because in that sandbox the gate resets and the next-morning recheck never comes due.
Tell them the order in a line or two: gate, stages, mock, delayed recheck. The night before an exam, plan the recheck for the morning (study-plan).
6. Reading the evidence
Map outcomes to the router's states. Gate test passed: Independent this session. Delayed recheck passed: Retrieved after delay. A free answer counted by "I had it": self-assessed, shown separately on the page. A key-word match on a free answer is practice, not a grade. The mock's number covers auto-marked items only. Asked "am I ready?", say what they did unaided and what hasn't been checked after a delay; ask them to read you the map if you can't see it. After the real exam, ask what appeared and what cost points, and use that to fix the next game.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

