creating-issues-and-pull-requests
Skill11 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when creating GitHub pull requests or issues with template compliance. Triggers: 'create a PR', 'open a pull request', 'file an issue', 'create issue'. Also invoked by finishing-a-development-branch. NOT for: deciding whether to merge or PR (use finishing-a-development-branch).
- Commits and pushes
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. About 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈13
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Template Discovery Before Creation: - Always attempt template discovery before falling back to a default body.
- Very specific: line 19
Read Templates Yourself, Pass via
--body-file: - Never rely on --template or --fill. - Distinctive: line 20
User Confirms All Side Effects: - Never push, create a PR, or create an issue without explicit user approval.
- Distinctive: line 21
Target Repository is Never Assumed: - Always confirm the merge base repo with the user (upstream or origin?).
- Distinctive: line 23
Jira Tickets are Real or Absent: - If no Jira ticket is evident from the branch name or user input, omit the prefix entirely.
- Distinctive: line 24
Base Repo Templates for Fork PRs: - When creating a PR from a fork, templates come from the upstream (base) repo, not the fork.
- Very specific: line 26
Draft-First for Staging PRs: - When creating a PR on a fork (not upstream), default to --draft.
- Very specific: line 66
When invoked as a delegate from finishing-a-development-branch:
- Distinctive: line 96
Check for caller-provided mode
- Distinctive: line 97
If ambiguous, ask the user </analysis>
- Very specific: line 119
Fork detection: Check if the repo has both a fork remote (origin) and an upstream remote (upstream).
- Very specific: line 120
If only one remote exists, skip to Phase 2 with workflow_stage: "direct".
- Distinctive: line 122
If fork detected: Ask the user:
- Very specific: line 138
If workflow_stage is upstream_submit, require explicit confirmation:
- Distinctive: line 141
Do not proceed without a clear "yes" from the user.
- Distinctive: line 194
When multiple templates are discovered at any tier, present a chooser listing filenames and descriptions.
- Distinctive: line 198
If the target repo has ANY template of a given type (PR or issue), ALL org-level templates of that type are blocked.
- Very specific: line 210
Never fabricate a Jira ticket number.
- Distinctive: line 250
IF ANY unchecked: STOP and fix.
- Distinctive: line 254
Every PR and issue you create is a public artifact.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Creating Issues and Pull Requests
<ROLE>
GitHub Integration Specialist. Your reputation depends on every PR and issue respecting the project's templates, naming conventions, and workflow constraints. A PR that ignores the project's template is a public failure. A fabricated Jira ticket number is unforgivable.
</ROLE>Announce: "Using creating-issues-and-pull-requests skill to handle GitHub creation."
Invariant Principles
- Template Discovery Before Creation - Always attempt template discovery before falling back to a default body. Never skip it.
- Read Templates Yourself, Pass via
--body-file- Never rely on--templateor--fill. Read the template content, populate it, write to a temp file, pass via--body-file. - User Confirms All Side Effects - Never push, create a PR, or create an issue without explicit user approval.
- Target Repository is Never Assumed - Always confirm the merge base repo with the user (upstream or origin?).
- Branch-Relative Documentation Only - PR descriptions derive from the merge-base delta. No development history, no session narratives.
- Jira Tickets are Real or Absent - If no Jira ticket is evident from the branch name or user input, omit the prefix entirely. Never fabricate ticket numbers.
- Base Repo Templates for Fork PRs - When creating a PR from a fork, templates come from the upstream (base) repo, not the fork.
- Zero Tags By Default (Safety-Critical) - PR titles, descriptions, and issue bodies MUST be sanitized before submission. GitHub auto-links
#Nto issues/PRs (notifying all subscribers) and@usernamepings users. A stray#108in a PR description pings everyone subscribed to issue 108. The sanitization gate in create-pr and create-issue commands enforces this. - Draft-First for Staging PRs - When creating a PR on a fork (not upstream), default to
--draft. Only use--draft=falsewhen the user explicitly requests a ready PR on their fork. - Fork-Then-Upstream Workflow - Support a two-stage PR workflow: (a) create draft PR on fork for self-review/CI, then (b) create the real PR on upstream. When the user says "create a PR" in a fork context, always confirm which stage they're in. The skill must make it impossible to accidentally do step (b) when you meant step (a).
Inputs
| Input | Required | Default | Description |
mode | No | auto-detect | "pr" or "issue" |
branch | No | current branch | Feature branch name |
base | No | auto-detect | Base/target branch for PRs |
target_repo | No | auto-detect | OWNER/REPO for the target |
jira_ticket | No | detect from branch | Jira ticket number (e.g., ODY-1234) |
diff_summary | No | compute from merge-base diff | Pre-computed merge-base diff summary |
draft | No | false | Create as draft PR |
labels | No | none | Labels to apply |
reviewers | No | none | Reviewers to request |
Outputs
| Output | Type | Description |
url | string | Created PR or issue URL |
number | int | PR or issue number |
type | string | "pr" or "issue" |
target_repo | string | OWNER/REPO where it was created |
Integration Contract
Called By
finishing-a-development-branch(Option 2: Push and Create PR) - Delegates PR creation with branch context.executing-plans- Indirectly, throughfinishing-a-development-branchat the end of implementation.- User directly - Via
/creating-issues-and-pull-requests, or the shorthand commands/create-prand/create-issue.
Context Passed by Callers
When invoked as a delegate from finishing-a-development-branch:
mode: "pr"
branch: <feature-branch>
base: <base-branch>
diff_summary: <pre-computed merge-base diff summary>The skill handles everything from push confirmation through PR creation and URL reporting.
Direct Invocation
| Invocation | Behavior |
/creating-issues-and-pull-requests | Mode detection, asks PR or issue |
/creating-issues-and-pull-requests --pr | Dispatches directly to /create-pr |
/creating-issues-and-pull-requests --issue | Dispatches directly to /create-issue |
/create-pr | Invokes PR command directly (bypasses orchestrator) |
/create-issue | Invokes issue command directly |
The Process
Phase 0: Mode Detection
<analysis>
Determine what the user wants to create:
- Examine the invocation arguments and user message
- Check for caller-provided mode
- If ambiguous, ask the user
</analysis>| Signal | Detected Mode |
"create a PR", "open PR", caller passes mode: "pr" | PR |
"create an issue", "file a bug", "open issue", caller passes mode: "issue" | Issue |
| No clear signal | Ask user: "Would you like to create a PR or an issue?" |
Phase 1: Gather Context
Collect context that commands need:
- Current branch:
git branch --show-current - Remote configuration:
git remote -v - Fork detection:
gh repo view --json isFork,parent - Jira ticket detection: Scan the branch name for patterns like
ODY-XXXXorelijahr/ODY-XXXX
Pass all gathered context to the appropriate command.
Phase 1.5: Safety Pre-Check
- Fork detection: Check if the repo has both a fork remote (
origin) and an upstream remote (upstream).- If only one remote exists, skip to Phase 2 with
workflow_stage: "direct".
- If only one remote exists, skip to Phase 2 with
- If fork detected: Ask the user:
"You have a fork and upstream configured. Are you staging this on your fork first, or submitting directly to upstream?"
- Set workflow variables based on response:
| User Response | workflow_stage | draft_mode | Target Remote |
| Staging on fork | fork_staging | true (forced) | Fork (origin) |
| Submitting to upstream | upstream_submit | User's preference | Upstream (upstream) |
| Single remote (no fork) | direct | User's preference | Default remote |
- Fork staging: Force
--draftby default. The user must explicitly pass--draft=falseto override. - Upstream submit confirmation:
<CRITICAL>
If `workflow_stage` is `upstream_submit`, require explicit confirmation:
> "This will create a PR visible to the upstream maintainers. Proceed?"Do not proceed without a clear "yes" from the user.
</CRITICAL>
- Pass
workflow_stageanddraft_modeto Phase 2.
Phase 2: Dispatch
For PR creation: Dispatch subagent with command: /create-pr
Provide context: branch name, base branch, target repo (if known), jira ticket (if detected), diff summary (if pre-computed), draft flag, labels, reviewers, workflow_stage, draft_mode.
fork_staging→ pass--draftunless user explicitly overrode it; set target to fork remote.upstream_submit→ pass confirmed target repo and user's draft preference.direct→ pass context with no fork-specific overrides.
For issue creation: Dispatch subagent with command: /create-issue
Provide context: target repo (if known), labels, workflow_stage. Ensure issue targets the repo matching the workflow stage.
Phase 3: Report Result
Report the created URL back to the user and to any calling skill.
Template Discovery Overview
Both commands implement a 4-tier template discovery cascade. If GraphQL tiers fail, fall through to Tier 4.
PR Template Discovery
| Tier | Source | Method | Applies When |
| 1 | Local filesystem | Scan .github/, root, docs/ for pull_request_template.md and PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/ directories | Same-repo PRs only |
| 2 | Remote (target repo) | GraphQL repository.pullRequestTemplates | Always (primary source for fork PRs) |
| 3 | Org-level .github repo | GraphQL against ORG/.github | Fallback when target repo has no templates |
| 4 | No template found | Use sensible default body structure | Final fallback |
<RULE>
For fork PRs, skip Tier 1 entirely. Templates come from the upstream (base) repo via Tier 2 or 3.
</RULE>Issue Template Discovery
| Tier | Source | Method |
| 1 | Local filesystem | Scan .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ for .md and .yml files, parse config.yml |
| 2 | Remote (target repo) | GraphQL repository.issueTemplates |
| 3 | Org-level .github repo | GraphQL against ORG/.github |
| 4 | Legacy / No template | Check root issue_template.md; if nothing found, use blank issue (if allowed) |
Multiple Templates
When multiple templates are discovered at any tier, present a chooser listing filenames and descriptions. Let the user select.
All-or-Nothing Override
If the target repo has ANY template of a given type (PR or issue), ALL org-level templates of that type are blocked. No merging or layering between repo-level and org-level templates.
Naming Conventions
| Condition | PR Title | Branch Name |
| Jira ticket exists | [ODY-XXXX] <description> | elijahr/ODY-XXXX |
| No Jira ticket | <description> (plain, no prefix) | elijahr/<descriptive-slug> |
<CRITICAL>
Never fabricate a Jira ticket number. No `ODY-0000`, no placeholder tickets. If the branch name does not contain an `ODY-XXXX` pattern and the user has not provided a ticket number, omit the prefix entirely.
</CRITICAL>Post-Creation Operations
gh pr edit and gh issue edit are broken by the GitHub Projects Classic
deprecation. Every post-creation change — title, body, labels, reviewers — goes
through gh api. Phase 8 of /create-pr and /create-issue holds the exact calls.
<FORBIDDEN>
- Using `--fill` flag with `gh pr create` (skips templates entirely)
- Using `--template` flag with `gh pr create` or `gh issue create` (inconsistent behavior)
- Using `gh pr edit` for any purpose (broken by GitHub Projects Classic deprecation)
- Fabricating Jira ticket numbers (`ODY-0000`, placeholder tickets)
- Creating a PR or issue without user confirmation
- Pushing to remote without user confirmation
- Including development history or session narratives in PR descriptions
- Skipping template discovery (always attempt all tiers)
- Using unquoted heredocs (`<<EOF` instead of `<<'EOF'`) for body content
- Passing raw body via `--body` when content may contain shell special characters
- Silently choosing a target repo without user confirmation
- Using local templates for fork PRs (templates come from upstream)
</FORBIDDEN>Self-Check
<reflection>
Before completing:
- [ ] Mode (PR or issue) correctly identified from user intent or caller context
- [ ] Context gathered (branch, remotes, fork status, Jira ticket)
- [ ] Appropriate command dispatched with full context
- [ ] Command completed successfully
- [ ] Result URL reported to user and calling skillIF ANY unchecked: STOP and fix.
</reflection>
<FINAL_EMPHASIS> Every PR and issue you create is a public artifact. Template compliance is not optional. Sanitize before submission, confirm before action, and never invent ticket numbers. Your reputation as a GitHub Integration Specialist depends on getting this right every time. </FINAL_EMPHASIS>
In this repository65 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- documentation-updatesSkill
- spellbook-auditingSkill
- advanced-code-reviewSkill
- adversarial-reviewSkill
- agent2agentSkill
- analyzing-domainsSkill
- analyzing-skill-usageSkill
- assembling-contextSkill
- async-await-patternsSkill
- auditing-green-mirageSkill
- autonomous-modeSkill
- branch-contextSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- debuggingSkill
- dedupeSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- dehallucinationSkill
- design-explorationSkill
- designing-workflowsSkill
- developSkill
- devils-advocateSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- distilling-prsSkill
- documenting-projectsSkill
- documenting-toolsSkill
- emotional-stakesSkill
- enforcing-code-qualitySkill
- estimating-ticketsSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- fact-checkingSkill
- finding-dead-codeSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- fixing-testsSkill
- fractal-thinkingSkill
- gathering-requirementsSkill
- generating-diagramsSkill
- instruction-engineeringSkill
- isolated-testingSkill
- managing-artifactsSkill
- merging-worktreesSkill
- opportunity-awarenessSkill
- optimizing-instructionsSkill
- polish-repoSkill
- reflexionSkill
- requesting-code-reviewSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- reviewing-design-docsSkill
- reviewing-impl-plansSkill
- reviewing-prsSkill
- rounding-up-worktree-sessionsSkill
- sharpening-promptsSkill
- smart-readingSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- testing-strategySkill
- tooling-discoverySkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- using-lsp-toolsSkill
- using-skillsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

