frontend-review
Skill11 starsChanged 50 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Reviews frontend code changes for Cloudscape compliance, React Hook Form patterns, TypeScript type safety, and test quality. Use after implementing frontend changes to catch issues before code review. Produces CRITICAL/IMPORTANT/SUGGESTION findings.
9 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- frnkgns/Overgeared-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jspi-fu/Aeson-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Bobagi/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 29, 2026
- henrilhos/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- garthcodes/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- coder/codertheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 9
- coder/coder★ 17ksame name
- jspi-fu/Aeson-skills★ 46same name
- yoyothesheep/claude-skills★ 16same name
- frnkgns/Overgeared-Skills★ 7same name
- garthcodes/claude-skills★ 2same name
- henrilhos/skills★ 1same name
- lammersbjorn/sane-next★ 1same name
- Bobagi/claude-skills★ 0same name
- krkrkrr/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository83 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- about-konductorSkill
- adr-generatorSkill
- adversarial-code-review-pass-integritySkill
- adversarial-code-review-pass-schemaSkill
- adversarial-code-review-pass-securitySkill
- adversarial-code-reviewSkill
- adversarial-design-reviewSkill
- agents-md-authoringSkill
- app-discoverySkill
- architecture-advisorSkill
- architecture-diagram-generationSkill
- argumentation-referenceSkill
- asana-sprint-planningSkill
- asdlc-aspect-reviewSkill
- asdlc-code-simplifierSkill
- aws-service-validatorSkill
- backend-developmentSkill
- backend-reviewSkill
- claude-teams-behaviorSkill
- cmux-dispatchSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- constraintsSkill
- cost-estimationSkill
- cypress-test-implementationSkill
- decision-researchSkill
- decision-writingSkill
- delegation-protocolSkill
- deliberation-panelSkill
- design-doc-guidelinesSkill
- design-evaluationSkill
- design-impact-reviewSkill
- design-quality-checkSkill
- doc-accuracy-analyzerSkill
- document-formatsSkill
- dom-inspectionSkill
- dynamodb-designSkill
- dynamodb-validationSkill
- e2e-test-strategySkill
- external-researchSkill
- find-aws-skillsSkill
- frontend-developmentSkill
- git-mergeSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- historical-issues-registrySkill
- humanize-writingSkill
- iam-policy-designSkill
- infra-validationSkill
- kiro-design-generationSkill
- kiro-requirements-generationSkill
- kiro-task-generationSkill
- legacy-to-agentic-estimateSkill
- mux-dispatchSkill
- non-functional-requirementsSkill
- persistent-memorySkill
- plan-reviewSkill
- playwright-test-implementationSkill
- policy-validationSkill
- pre-planning-analysisSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Use this skill when:
- Distinctive: line 79
Test passes only due to implementation detail coupling
- Distinctive: line 87
Test assertions check existence but not actual values
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Frontend Review
Overview
Reviews frontend code with a critical eye across Cloudscape compliance, form patterns, type safety, component quality, and test coverage. Provides direct, unbiased assessment — calls out pattern violations, unnecessary complexity, and missing test coverage.
Usage
Use this skill when:
- Reviewing frontend changes before submitting a code review
- Validating Cloudscape component compliance
- Checking React Hook Form + Zod pattern adherence
- Assessing TypeScript type safety and test coverage
Core Concepts
Review Focus Areas
Pattern compliance (React Hook Form + Zod, useFormContext, FormProvider), Cloudscape compliance (no native HTML, no inline styles), type safety (no any, explicit useForm<T>() types), code quality (memoized handlers, stable layouts, no unnecessary wrappers), and test quality (actual value assertions, error state coverage).
Review Checklist
Pattern Compliance
- React Hook Form used — not custom state hooks
- Zod validation used — not manual validation
- Form sub-components use
useFormContext— no prop drilling - Wizard pages wrapped in
FormProvider
Cloudscape Compliance
- No native HTML elements (
<div>,<span>,<input>,<button>,<a>) - No inline styles (
style={{}}) Boxused instead of<div>or<span>KeyValuePairsfor label-value displaySpaceBetweenfor spacing- Fixed column counts in
ColumnLayout FormFieldwraps all form inputs
Type Safety
- No
anytypes in production code - Explicit types on
useForm<FormType>()calls - TypeScript utility types used correctly (
Pick,Omit,Partial) - No redundant type assertions
Code Quality
- No unused code or imports
- No unnecessary wrapper components
- Event handlers memoized with
useCallback - Imperative array building for 3+ conditional items (not ternary chains)
- Stable layouts (fixed column counts)
Testing
- Helper functions have unit tests
- Form components have component tests
- Test assertions check actual values (not just existence)
- Error states tested
- Edge cases covered
Quality Gate
CRITICAL (blocks approval):
- Native HTML element used instead of Cloudscape component
- Inline style used (
style={{}}) - Form state managed with
useStateinstead of React Hook Form anytype in production code- Test passes only due to implementation detail coupling
IMPORTANT (should fix):
- Missing explicit type on
useFormcall - Hardcoded validation message instead of constraint constant
- Event handler not memoized (causes unnecessary re-renders)
- Dynamic column count in
ColumnLayout(causes layout shift) - Test assertions check existence but not actual values
SUGGESTION:
- Could extract repeated form field pattern into reusable component
- Could add missing edge case tests
- Could strengthen error state test coverage
Present findings as: CRITICAL → IMPORTANT → SUGGESTION. Ask: "Fix these issues? [y/n]" — unless scope_confirmed is true, in which case report all the findings and leave fixing to the caller, without asking.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

