backend-development
Skill11 starsChanged 49 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Implements backend code changes for Lambda handlers, service layers, and DynamoDB operations. Use when fixing code quality issues, adding features, or optimizing backend logic. Follows KISS/YAGNI/DRY principles with minimal, surgical changes.
23 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- its-ash/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- hu465/claude-skills-their own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- KMaruthi2002/universal-llm-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- taichuy/1flowbasetheir own version, first seen Oct 23, 2026
- Dinh2026/claudekit-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- captain-corgi/marketplace-websitetheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use Problem-Solving Techniques, llm-application-dev and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
truongtv22SkillProblem-Solving Techniques
Apply systematic problem-solving techniques for complexity spirals (simplification cascades), innovation blocks (collision-zone thinking), recurring patterns (meta-pattern recognition), assumption constraints (inversion exercise), scale uncertainty (scale game), and dispatch when stuck. Techniques derived from Microsoft Amplifier project patterns adapted for immediate application.
Also in 5 projects that use this
pepebot-spaceSkillllm-application-dev
Building applications with Large Language Models - prompt engineering, RAG patterns, and LLM integration. Use for AI-powered features, chatbots, or LLM-based automation.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MoizIbnYousafSkillaudit-library-health
Use when checking the overall health of a skills library. Run doctor, validate, check for stale skills, and verify generated docs are in sync.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MoizIbnYousafSkillbrowse-and-evaluate
Use when exploring the ai-agent-skills catalog to find, compare, and evaluate skills before installing. Always use --fields to limit output size and --dry-run before committing to an install.
Also in 3 projects that use this
OpenAnalystIncSkillmarkdown-novel-viewer
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +7 more from MoizIbnYousaf
Other versions23 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 23
- rommapp/romm★ 14ksame name
- mrgoonie/claudekit-skills★ 2.2ksame name
- MoizIbnYousaf/Ai-Agent-Skills★ 1.1ksame name
- skillcreatorai/Ai-Agent-Skills★ 1.1ksame name
- MoizIbnYousaf/ai-agent-skills★ 1.1ksame name
- taichuy/1flowbase★ 292same name
- Mindrally/skills★ 275same name
- typv/nest-turbo-starter★ 224same name
- duongthinh03/portfolio★ 85same name
- VoDaiLocz/kilo-kit-mcp★ 28same name
13 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository83 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- about-konductorSkill
- adr-generatorSkill
- adversarial-code-review-pass-integritySkill
- adversarial-code-review-pass-schemaSkill
- adversarial-code-review-pass-securitySkill
- adversarial-code-reviewSkill
- adversarial-design-reviewSkill
- agents-md-authoringSkill
- app-discoverySkill
- architecture-advisorSkill
- architecture-diagram-generationSkill
- argumentation-referenceSkill
- asana-sprint-planningSkill
- asdlc-aspect-reviewSkill
- asdlc-code-simplifierSkill
- aws-service-validatorSkill
- backend-reviewSkill
- claude-teams-behaviorSkill
- cmux-dispatchSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- constraintsSkill
- cost-estimationSkill
- cypress-test-implementationSkill
- decision-researchSkill
- decision-writingSkill
- delegation-protocolSkill
- deliberation-panelSkill
- design-doc-guidelinesSkill
- design-evaluationSkill
- design-impact-reviewSkill
- design-quality-checkSkill
- doc-accuracy-analyzerSkill
- document-formatsSkill
- dom-inspectionSkill
- dynamodb-designSkill
- dynamodb-validationSkill
- e2e-test-strategySkill
- external-researchSkill
- find-aws-skillsSkill
- frontend-developmentSkill
- frontend-reviewSkill
- git-mergeSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- historical-issues-registrySkill
- humanize-writingSkill
- iam-policy-designSkill
- infra-validationSkill
- kiro-design-generationSkill
- kiro-requirements-generationSkill
- kiro-task-generationSkill
- legacy-to-agentic-estimateSkill
- mux-dispatchSkill
- non-functional-requirementsSkill
- persistent-memorySkill
- plan-reviewSkill
- playwright-test-implementationSkill
- policy-validationSkill
- pre-planning-analysisSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Use this skill when:
- Distinctive: line 32
Prefer simple, minimal solutions.
- Distinctive: line 38
Prefer simple solutions over design patterns: Only introduce patterns (Strategy, Observer) when they solve a real, existing problem — not …
- Distinctive: line 47
Use return values from store operations to avoid extra queries
- Very specific: line 52
Use utility types: Partial<T>, Pick<T, K>, Omit<T, K>
- Very specific: line 54
Use ?? for null/undefined checks, not ||
- Distinctive: line 59
Use conditional writes to prevent race conditions
- Distinctive: line 60
No extra queries — use return values from write operations
- Distinctive: line 61
Follow single-table design patterns (PK/SK)
- Very specific: line 65
Use specific error types, not generic Error
- Distinctive: line 72
Create shared fixture factories for test data — not inline objects
- Very specific: line 73
Use toContainEqual for order-independent assertions
- Distinctive: line 74
Add tests for new code before marking complete
- Distinctive: line 75
Test edge cases: null values, empty arrays, boundary conditions
- Distinctive: line 103
Test data constructed inline instead of using fixture factory
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Backend Development
Overview
Implements backend changes with surgical precision — only the specific issue, nothing more. Covers Lambda handler patterns, service layer architecture, DynamoDB operations, type safety, error handling, and test improvements.
Usage
Use this skill when:
- Fixing code quality issues from code review feedback
- Implementing new Lambda handlers or service methods
- Optimizing DynamoDB operations (atomicity, efficiency)
- Improving type safety (removing
any, adding null checks) - Adding or improving test coverage
Core Concepts
Architectural Layers
Handlers (entry point, delegates to facade) → Business Facade (orchestrates service calls) → Services (created via factory, contain business logic) → Repositories (data access through interfaces). No layer should bypass the one below it.
KISS/YAGNI/DRY
Prefer simple, minimal solutions. Only add abstractions that solve a real, existing problem — not hypothetical future needs.
Core Principles
Always read the complete file before making changes. Make minimal changes — only fix the specific issue. Follow established patterns in the codebase. Maintain backward compatibility.
Prefer simple solutions over design patterns. Only introduce patterns (Strategy, Observer) when they solve a real, existing problem — not hypothetical future needs. Call out over-engineering directly.
Implementation Standards
Handler Patterns
- Handlers delegate to a business facade — no direct business logic in handlers
- Services created via factory pattern — no direct instantiation
- Data access through repository interfaces — no direct database calls
- Use return values from store operations to avoid extra queries
Type Safety
- No
anytypes in production code (test mocks are the only exception) - Use utility types:
Partial<T>,Pick<T, K>,Omit<T, K> - Validate before non-null assertions (
!) - Use
??for null/undefined checks, not||
DynamoDB Operations
- Atomic operations use transactions for multi-item updates
- Use conditional writes to prevent race conditions
- No extra queries — use return values from write operations
- Follow single-table design patterns (PK/SK)
Error Handling
- Use specific error types, not generic
Error - Catch specific errors, not catch-all handlers
- Structured logging with correlation IDs and context
- Log diffs with structured fields showing before/after state
Testing
- Create shared fixture factories for test data — not inline objects
- Use
toContainEqualfor order-independent assertions - Add tests for new code before marking complete
- Test edge cases: null values, empty arrays, boundary conditions
Output Format
For each change, provide:
- File path
- Issue (with line numbers)
- Exact code changes
- How to verify the fix
- What else might be affected
Quality Gate
CRITICAL (must fix before done):
- TypeScript compilation fails
- Tests fail
- Breaking change introduced without migration path
- Direct database connection bypassing repository layer
- Race condition introduced (non-atomic multi-item update)
IMPORTANT (should fix):
anytype used in production code- Missing null check before non-null assertion
- Extra query when return value from write operation could be used
- Catch-all error handler masking specific errors
- Test data constructed inline instead of using fixture factory
SUGGESTION:
- Could extract repeated logic into shared utility
- Could add structured log fields for better observability
- Could strengthen test assertions to check actual values
Present findings as: CRITICAL → IMPORTANT → SUGGESTION. Ask: "Fix these issues? [y/n]" — unless scope_confirmed is true, in which case report all the findings and leave fixing to the caller, without asking.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

