dev-planner
Skill19 starsChanged 29 days agoMITView on GitHub
Plan a clear outcome as a short task or dependent phases. Reuse active plans; use phases when requested or when deliverables need separate acceptance.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- InanisV/my-claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 22, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- InanisV/my-claude-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- bug-fixerSkill
- design-brief-builderSkill
- design-makerSkill
- dev-builderSkill
- goal-writerSkill
- product-spec-builderSkill
- project-knowledgeSkill
- release-builderSkill
- reviewerSkill
- self-evolverSkill
- skill-builderSkill
- creatorSkill
The file
Files
开发计划
Purpose
让另一会话能从有效契约、前置成果和验收继续执行,计划规模与任务相称。
Trigger
用户要求计划;或多个分别验收的阶段存在先后依赖。产品和维护都可能需要计划;单一明确任务可直接开发。
Required context
用户目标、已确认范围/验收、现状入口、相关需求/设计、当前计划、真实代码与验证命令。
Workflow
- 按实际规模选择更新现有短任务或 Phase;用户点名 Phase 时落实,不用口头计划代替文件。
- 范围对账:核对相关有效决定、非目标、延期和被替代记录。信息足够但缺形式变更记录时补写;只为真正未决选择提问。
- Phase 在实施前落盘目标、任务、前置 ID 和所需成果、验收及风险理由;小型产品变更只需短任务和需求更新。
- 索引维护活跃/下一步及历史导航;更新承接关系,不重抄全部历史。
- 先判断任务今天是否适用,再判断当时是否完成。按有效撤销/替代决定移出失效任务;部分替代只关闭相关部分,旧未测试记录不自动成为下一步。必要时使用 project-knowledge 对账。
Output
短任务或 docs/DEV-PLAN.md 与相关 Phase 明细;范围对账、depends_on、必要的 supersedes、验收和分别记录的状态。
Stop or escalate
只有影响方向/范围/验收的未决项阻塞其依赖阶段;不把缺模板变成用户重新决定的理由。Phase 身份不决定 R2;按具体后果评级。
References
编写计划时读 stage-contract.md;文档与状态细则读共同契约相关章节。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

