design-maker
Skill19 starsChanged 31 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create prototypes, wireframes and interaction states when a visual artifact will reduce uncertainty. Optional for new or changed designs; not required for routine maintenance.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- cevilents/prd-design-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- cevilents/prd-design-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- bug-fixerSkill
- design-brief-builderSkill
- dev-builderSkill
- dev-plannerSkill
- goal-writerSkill
- product-spec-builderSkill
- project-knowledgeSkill
- release-builderSkill
- reviewerSkill
- self-evolverSkill
- skill-builderSkill
- creatorSkill
The file
Files
设计制图技能 (design-maker)
Purpose
用最小必要的视觉产物消除页面结构、关键状态和交互上的开发不确定性。
Trigger
- UI、布局、交互或品牌表达会显著影响开发计划。
- 用户需要在开发前检查关键页面或状态。
- Product Spec 和 Design Brief 已稳定,但文字仍不足以指导实现。
没有明显界面、常规 UI 可直接计划或设计只会增加装饰时跳过。
Required context
- 当前相关需求与设计规则(复用 Spec/Design Brief、等价文档或明确确认)。
- 页面/流程范围、目标平台和响应式约束。
- 用户提供的截图、品牌资产、参考图或原型资料。
Workflow
- 映射需要视觉决策的关键流程和验收标准。
- 选择线框图、高保真稿或实现注释中的最小充分产物。
- 覆盖默认、空、加载、错误、成功和关键交互状态。
- 标注全局变量、组件复用、响应式规则和与文档的映射。
- 检查产物没有擅自扩大产品范围。
Output
- 页面或流程清单。
- 关键布局、状态、交互与响应式规则。
- 设计稿、线框图或实现注释。
- 留给开发阶段处理的明确细节。
Stop or escalate
- 相关需求或设计选择缺失且影响产物:补齐必要输入,不因缺少同名文档返回。
- 必要页面、流程或风格仍不稳定:返回前序阶段。
- 设计要求新增产品范围:升级为产品变更。
- 缺少品牌、内容或布局依据却要求高保真定稿:停止并说明缺口。
References
执行前读取 stage-contract.md。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

