agentleFS
aprameyakaprameyak/coding-skills/debug-systematic/SKILL.md

debug-systematic

Skill1 starsChanged 41 days agoMITView on GitHub

Debug failures with a hypothesis-driven loop. Use when fixing bugs, investigating exceptions, flaky tests, or unexpected behavior.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Test: run the smallest check that falsifies a hypothesis.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not spray unrelated changes hoping something works.

    line 19
  3. Distinctive:

    Prefer logging/assertions at boundaries over shotgun prints.

    line 21

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Debug Systematic

Loop

  1. Observe: capture exact symptom, error text, stack, and repro steps.
  2. Hypothesize: list 1–3 plausible causes ranked by likelihood.
  3. Test: run the smallest check that falsifies a hypothesis.
  4. Isolate: binary-search the fault (input, commit, module, line).
  5. Fix: change the root cause; keep the diff minimal.
  6. Verify: confirm the original repro is gone; add a regression test when valuable.

Rules

  • Do not spray unrelated changes hoping something works.
  • Change one variable at a time when experimenting.
  • Prefer logging/assertions at boundaries over shotgun prints.
  • Record what was tried so the same dead ends are not repeated.

Output

Symptom: ...
Repro: ...
Root cause: ...
Fix: ...
Verification: ...

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.