agentleFS
anorthanorth/agent-skills/skills/to-tickets/SKILL.md

to-tickets

Skill1 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub

Break a settled design, spec, or the current conversation into ready tickets in the project's issue tracker. Use when the user asks to write tickets, split work into tickets, or file a design.

192 other projects use a version of this, 156 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, to-questionnaire and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • liufeng1976Skill

    setup-ts-deep-modules

    Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

    Also in 43 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    to-questionnaire

    Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.

    Also in 89 projects that use this

  • ryotaroh180105Skill

    claude-handoff

    Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.

    Also in 40 projects that use this

  • RoentekSkill

    loop-me

    Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.

    Also in 47 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    implement-spec

    Implement the result of /to-spec and /to-tickets in code.

    Also in 69 projects that use this

  • sponge-b0bSkill

    to-specs

    Project decision-complete planning into implementation Specs from exact Canonical Contract Ledger semantics while preserving Independent Specs and existing Spec identity.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +2 more from aws

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. 2 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 2

    Common

    Most of the 181 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 10

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If the user passes a reference (a spec or design document, a ticket id or URL), fetch it and read it in full.

    line 21
  2. Distinctive:

    If the design can't be split into tickets yet, because a ticket would need decisions nobody has made, stop and say which decisions are …

    line 23
  3. Distinctive:

    If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code.

    line 28
  4. Common:

    Look for opportunities to prefactor the code to make the implementation easier.

    line 32
  5. Distinctive:

    If the change fits in one ready ticket, write one ticket, and skip to step 5.

    line 37
  6. Distinctive:

    Don't force it into a vertical slice.

    line 58
  7. Distinctive:

    When even the batches can't stay green alone, keep the sequence but let them share an integration branch that all block a final …

    line 63
  8. Common:

    Should any tickets be merged or split further?

    line 81
  9. Very specific:

    Write the tickets in the project's issue tracker: the single ticket, or each child, in the /ready-ticket shape.

    line 87
  10. Distinctive:

    If the project has no tracker, ask the user where tickets go.

    line 88
  11. Distinctive:

    Put the overall design in the parent ticket, or reference the spec or design document that holds it.

    line 90
  12. Distinctive:

    Use the tracker's native parent and blocking relationships where it has them.

    line 93
  13. Distinctive:

    If the source was an existing rough ticket, rewrite it into the single ticket or the parent, keeping its original text in a note.

    line 95

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 181 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

To Tickets

Break a settled design into tickets, each ready to build (see /ready-ticket). A small change becomes one ticket. A larger one becomes a parent ticket holding the overall design, with vertical slices as child tickets, each declaring the tickets that block it.

1. Gather context

Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes a reference (a spec or design document, a ticket id or URL), fetch it and read it in full.

If the design can't be split into tickets yet, because a ticket would need decisions nobody has made, stop and say which decisions are missing. Don't make them here.

2. Explore the codebase

If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Ticket titles and descriptions should use the project's domain glossary vocabulary, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.

Look for opportunities to prefactor the code to make the implementation easier. "Make the change easy, then make the easy change."

3. Size

If the change fits in one ready ticket, write one ticket, and skip to step 5. Otherwise it gets a parent ticket holding the overall design, with child tickets for the parts.

4. Draft vertical slices

Break the work into vertical slice tickets, unless the user asks for a different order, such as bottom-up or UI-first.

  • Each slice cuts a narrow but COMPLETE path through every layer (schema, API, UI, tests): vertical, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer.
  • A completed slice is demoable or verifiable on its own.
  • Each slice is sized to fit in a single fresh agent session.
  • Prefactoring comes first, as its own tickets, blocking the slices that build on it.

Give each ticket its blocking edges: the other tickets that must complete before it can start. A ticket with no blockers can start immediately.

Wide refactors are the exception to vertical slicing. A wide refactor is one mechanical change (rename a column, retype a shared symbol) whose blast radius fans across the whole codebase, so a single edit breaks thousands of call sites at once and no vertical slice can land green. Don't force it into a vertical slice; sequence it as expand–contract. First expand: add the new form beside the old so nothing breaks. Then migrate the call sites over in batches sized by blast radius (per package, per directory), each batch its own ticket blocked by the expand, keeping CI green batch to batch because the old form still exists. Finally contract: delete the old form once no caller remains, in a ticket blocked by every migrate batch. When even the batches can't stay green alone, keep the sequence but let them share an integration branch that all block a final integrate-and-verify ticket; green is promised only there.

5. Confirm with the user

For a single ticket, show it and confirm it with the user.

Otherwise, present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each ticket, show:

  • ID: short ID, code, or slug
  • Title: short descriptive name
  • Blocked by: which other tickets (if any) must complete first
  • What it delivers: the end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work

Ask the user:

  • Does the granularity feel right? (too coarse / too fine)
  • Are the blocking edges correct: does each ticket only depend on tickets that genuinely gate it?
  • Should any tickets be merged or split further?

Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.

6. Publish the tickets

Write the tickets in the project's issue tracker: the single ticket, or each child, in the /ready-ticket shape. If the project has no tracker, ask the user where tickets go.

  • Put the overall design in the parent ticket, or reference the spec or design document that holds it.
  • Give each child its slice of the design, and reference the parent.
  • Publish in dependency order (blockers first), so each ticket's blocking edges can reference real identifiers. Use the tracker's native parent and blocking relationships where it has them; otherwise list them in the ticket's Context and Blocked by.
  • If the source was an existing rough ticket, rewrite it into the single ticket or the parent, keeping its original text in a note.

For example, in Beads: the parent is an epic with the overall design in its design field. Each child is created with --parent, with its slice of the design in design and its done checks in acceptance; blocking edges are bd dep add <ticket> <blocker>.

Report the tickets created, and which can start now.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.