agentleFS
ankitgoyalioankitgoyalio/skills/skills/apple/ios-design/SKILL.md

ios-design

Skill1 starsChanged 56 days agoMITView on GitHub

Design or review iPhone interfaces for navigation, adaptive layout, controls, accessibility, appearance, permissions, or system entry points.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Files
SKILL.md

iOS design

  1. Bound the review or design to the requested interaction and supported OS range. For code changes, inspect the framework, SDK, and deployment target; check API availability separately from visual guidance.
  2. Load only the references triggered by that interaction:
  • Layout, tabs, drill-down, or search: layout and navigation.
  • Controls, gestures, presentations, or loading/error states: controls and feedback.
  • Materials, colors, symbols, or animation: appearance.
  • Text, controls, navigation, focus, or accessible media: accessibility.
  • Protected resources, sign-in, or account creation: permissions and accounts.
  • Onboarding, launch, widgets, notifications, sharing, or background transitions: entry points and lifecycle.
  1. For behavior newer than the source refresh, or an implementation symbol not covered here, fetch its Apple page with sosumi fetch <Apple URL> and verify the supported OS and API availability.
  2. Check the failure conditions for the affected interaction: small viewports for layout, enlarged text and focus for text/navigation, keyboard occlusion for editing, assistive activation for controls, appearance settings for custom rendering, and restored context for lifecycle changes. For an artifact review, cite the code or visible behavior supporting each finding; for a design, specify the expected outcome in each applicable condition. For a running implementation, exercise those conditions and record results; label unavailable runtime checks untested. Finish when every affected interaction has a supported decision or a finding with its trigger, user impact, and correction.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.