agentleFS
andrew-shwetzerandrew-shwetzer/career-ops-plugin/skills/compare/SKILL.md

compare

Skill501 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Compare multiple job opportunities side by side. See scores, compensation, pros/cons, and a recommendation. Use when someone says 'compare my options', 'which job should I take', 'rank my opportunities', or 'compare these roles'.

16 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use create, optimize and 4 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • MicrosoftSkill

    create

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • aakash-dharSkill

    optimize

    Analyzes code for performance issues including slow algorithms, memory leaks, unnecessary re-renders, database query problems, and resource bottlenecks. Use when the user says "this is slow", "optimize this", "performance issue", "why is this taking so long?", or "make this faster".

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • AnthropicSkill

    analyze

    Answer data questions -- from quick lookups to full analyses. Use when looking up a single metric, investigating what's driving a trend or drop, comparing segments over time, or preparing a formal data report for stakeholders.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    audit

    Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    report

    Turn an exploration (threads, findings, charts) into a single Markdown report — note, blog post, executive summary, KPI dashboard, slide brief, or multi-section analytical report, with embedded charts.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AnthropicSkill

    start

    Set up your bio-research environment and explore available tools. Use when first getting oriented with the plugin, checking which literature, drug-discovery, or visualization MCP servers are connected, or surveying available analysis skills before starting a new project.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read all files in data/evaluations/.

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    If user specified companies/roles: match to evaluations (fuzzy OK)

    line 22
  3. Distinctive:

    If "compare my top options" or no argument: select top 3-5 by score with non-terminal status (Evaluated, Resume Ready, Applied, Interview)

    line 23
  4. Distinctive:

    If fewer than 2 evaluations exist:

    line 25
  5. Distinctive:

    If scores are very close (within 0.3), say so:

    line 78

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Compare Opportunities

Side-by-side comparison of evaluated job opportunities.

Step 0: Load Evaluations

Read all files in data/evaluations/. Parse the scores, archetype, company, role, location, and compensation from each.

Step 1: Select Opportunities

  • If user specified companies/roles: match to evaluations (fuzzy OK)
  • If "compare my top options" or no argument: select top 3-5 by score with non-terminal status (Evaluated, Resume Ready, Applied, Interview)
  • If fewer than 2 evaluations exist:

    "You need at least 2 evaluated jobs to compare. Evaluate more postings first by pasting a JD."

Step 2: Comparison Table

## Opportunity Comparison

| Dimension | {Company A: Role} | {Company B: Role} | {Company C: Role} |
|---|---|---|---|
| **Score** | {X.X}/5.0 | {X.X}/5.0 | {X.X}/5.0 |
| **Archetype** | {type} | {type} | {type} |
| **Seniority** | {level} | {level} | {level} |
| **Location** | {loc} | {loc} | {loc} |
| **Compensation** | {range or "Not disclosed"} | {range} | {range} |
| **Strongest match** | {top requirement match} | ... | ... |
| **Biggest gap** | {main risk} | ... | ... |
| **Status** | {current status} | ... | ... |

Step 3: Pros and Cons

For each opportunity, list 3 specific pros and 2 specific cons. These must reference actual evaluation data, not generic statements.

### {Company A} - {Role}
**Pros:**
- {specific strength from Block B match}
- {compensation/location advantage}
- {career trajectory fit}

**Cons:**
- {specific gap or risk}
- {concern from evaluation}

Step 4: Recommendation

## My Recommendation

**Best overall match:** {Company - Role} ({score}/5.0)
{2-3 sentences: why this one stands out, what makes it the strongest fit}

**Best growth opportunity:** {Company - Role}
{1-2 sentences: highest upside if you can close the gaps}

**Safest option:** {Company - Role}
{1-2 sentences: most likely to result in an offer}

If scores are very close (within 0.3), say so:

"These are genuinely close. The tiebreaker is which company and role excites you most. Numbers can't measure that."

Step 5: Next Steps

"Want me to:

  • Tailor a resume for your top pick? Say 'tailor my resume for {company}'
  • Research any of these companies deeper? Say 'research {company}'
  • Evaluate more options? Paste another job posting"

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.