kilocode-cli
Skill14 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use Kilo Code CLI as a subagent. Lets the main agent prompt Kilo Code CLI from the terminal in headless mode with the `kilo` command, and send the goal, the decisions and the scope with the task. Use when the user asks to delegate work to Kilo Code CLI, when a task needs a second independent agent, or when a plan needs a fresh perspective.
- Installs packages
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- antigravity-cliSkill
- claude-codeSkill
- cline-cliSkill
- codex-cliSkill
- copilot-cliSkill
- cursor-cliSkill
- deepagents-codeSkill
- devin-cliSkill
- gemini-cliSkill
- goose-cliSkill
- grok-cliSkill
- hermes-agentSkill
- junie-cliSkill
- kimi-codeSkill
- kiro-cliSkill
- mistral-vibeSkill
- oh-my-piSkill
- openclaw-cliSkill
- opencode-cliSkill
- openhands-cliSkill
- pi-cliSkill
- qoder-cliSkill
- qwen-codeSkill
- <skill-name>Skill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 48
Secrets or policy-sensitive work: Do not pipe credentials into a subagent.
- Distinctive: line 50
Low return on investment: If writing the handoff costs more than doing the edit, do the edit.
- Distinctive: line 61
Treat every call as stateless delegation: the subagent keeps nothing between calls, so each command must carry its own state.
- Distinctive: line 71
Write the prompt as a transfer of shared state, not as a title.
- Distinctive: line 82
Prefer sequential delegations with explicit carry-over.
- Distinctive: line 96
After the subagent returns:
- Distinctive: line 104
Every vendor has its own terminal rules.
- Distinctive: line 108
Exit code 0 is not success: If stdout is empty, treat the run as failed and read stderr.
- Very specific: line 119
Keep all seven sub-headings, in this order, even if the answer is "none".
- Very specific: line 154
Do not pass -i/--interactive.
- Very specific: line 174
Run kilo models for the identifiers this install accepts, optionally filtered by provider with kilo models <provider>.
- Distinctive: line 178
If the user names a model, use it.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Kilo Code (subagent / task delegation)
<!-- =============================================================================
GLOBAL HALF — sections 1 to 5.
These sections are identical in every skill in this repository.
Copy them without any change. Do not put a vendor name or a flag in them.
A change here must be made in all skills at the same time.
============================================================================= -->What is it
This skill teaches your agent to use an agent from another vendor as a subagent.
Almost every coding agent has a headless mode. Headless mode runs the agent from the terminal with one command and returns the answer to stdout. This skill gives the command pattern for one such agent, and the protocol to transfer enough context with the task.
You stay the main agent. You keep the plan, the decisions and the conversation with the user. The subagent does one bounded task and reports back.
When to delegate
- The user asks for it. The user names another agent, or asks for a second opinion.
- Large or multi-step work. The task covers several files, phases or checkpoints.
- Code review with a fresh mind. Another agent reviews the work with a different lens and no memory of the decisions that produced it.
- Planning that needs different ideas. A second agent proposes options that you did not consider.
- An internal council. Several subagents answer the same question, and you compare the answers.
- Deep research. The other CLI has web search, web extraction or browser automation.
- Background investigation. A long task runs in the background while you continue in the foreground.
When not to delegate
- Small or single-step tasks. One or two edits, or a short explanation, are faster in this thread.
- Tight feedback loops. The user wants quick back-and-forth in one conversation.
- Secrets or policy-sensitive work. Do not pipe credentials into a subagent. Redact first.
- Context you already hold. Repeating the whole plan in a prompt adds no value.
- Low return on investment. If writing the handoff costs more than doing the edit, do the edit.
- Work that needs high precision and full judgement. A subagent without your context will break a task that depends on a detail only this session knows.
Delegation and context transfer protocol
An isolated subagent saves tokens, but it splits the story. The subagent does not see this conversation. It has no memory of the goal you agreed with the user, the decisions you already made, or the paths you agreed not to touch. A poor handoff causes misread tasks, wrong assumptions about the stack or the style, and wasted edits.
Treat every call as stateless delegation: the subagent keeps nothing between calls, so each command must carry its own state. A good handoff happens when you keep these practices in mind:
- Shared state handoff. The prompt carries the original goal, the decisions already made, and the explicit scope, to bridge the subagent's missing session history.
- Contextual preservation. The high-volume work stays in the isolated process, so the bulk never enters this conversation and no "split story" forms from missing history.
- Result reconciliation. What comes back is folded into this thread afterwards, so there is a single source of truth.
Write the prompt as a transfer of shared state, not as a title. Include all six fields:
| Include | Why |
| Goal | The same objective as the user, not only the immediate micro-task. |
| Decisions | Framework, patterns, naming, "use X not Y" — anything that would otherwise be guessed wrong. |
| Scope | The absolute paths and modules to touch, and the areas to leave alone. A relative path may not resolve where you expect. |
| Constraints | Performance, accessibility, compatibility, review gates, "no new dependencies". |
| Verification | The exact command the subagent must run and pass before it returns. |
| Output | For example: "report only, no edits", "apply edits with a minimal diff", "list the files changed". |
Prefer sequential delegations with explicit carry-over. Parallel runs diverge unless every run gets the same briefing.
Run the subagent in the mode that does the work without asking for approval. Headless mode has nobody to answer a permission prompt. Any mode that stops to ask will stall, or return an empty answer with a success exit code. Each CLI names this mode differently — take the flag from the vendor card below.
Never call a subagent in plan mode. Many CLIs have a plan or read-only mode. That mode makes the other agent write a plan for itself, which is not what you asked for: you want its work or its answer, and you keep the planning. Plan mode also waits for someone to approve that plan, so the run comes back with nothing. If you want no file changes, keep the auto-approving mode and write "report only, no edits" in the Output field. Do not use plan mode to make a run read-only.
After the subagent returns:
- Report to the user. Give a short summary. Do not paste long logs unless the user asks.
- Reconcile the context. Record the decisions it made, the files it changed, and the open risks, so this session stays the single source of truth.
CLI failure modes
Every vendor has its own terminal rules. A headless run fails quietly more often than it fails loudly.
- Wrap the call in an external timeout. A headless CLI can stall before its own timeout starts.
- Exit code 0 is not success. If stdout is empty, treat the run as failed and read stderr. A permission the CLI could not ask for, and a prompt that never arrived, both look like success.
- Never carry a flag habit from one CLI to another. The same short flag means different things in
different tools. In OpenCode,
-pis--password: passing a prompt to it empties the message and the run waits on stdin forever. Confirm every flag against the CLI's own--help. - An unrecognized-flag error means this skill is stale, not that the task is impossible. Read
--help, continue with the flags that exist, and tell the user which line in this file is wrong.
<!-- =============================================================================
VENDOR HALF — section 6.
Everything below is specific to this CLI.
Keep all seven sub-headings, in this order, even if the answer is "none".
Take every flag from the installed binary (`<cli> --help`), not from memory
and not from another skill in this repository.
============================================================================= -->Vendor card
Binary and prompt form
- Binary:
kilo(the package also installskilocode, which points at the same file) - Install:
npm install -g @kilocode/cli(npm package@kilocode/cli). - Prompt form: positional, after the
runsubcommand:kilo run "prompt"(kilo run [message..]— the message is a variadic positional argument). A barekiloopens the interactive interface and never returns. - The verified trap:
-pis--password— basic auth for an attached server, defaulting toKILO_SERVER_PASSWORD. This is the same trap OpenCode has, because Kilo Code is built on OpenCode. Writingkilo run -p "GOAL: ..."feeds the whole prompt into basic auth and leaves the message empty, so the run produces nothing. Always pass the prompt positionally.
Headless and output flags
| Need | Flag |
| Run once and exit | run "prompt" |
| Formatted output | --format default |
| Raw JSON events | --format json |
| Diagnostics to stderr | --print-logs, --log-level DEBUG|INFO|WARN|ERROR |
| Working directory | --dir <path> |
| Attach a file to the message | -f, --file <path> |
| Reasoning effort | --variant <provider-specific value> |
| Continue a session | -c/--continue, or -s/--session <id> |
| Skip external plugins | --pure |
There is no --timeout on kilo run and no documented default limit, so wrap long calls in an
external timeout. There is also no --quiet.
Do not pass -i/--interactive; it switches the run to an interactive split-footer mode.
Approvals and permissions
--auto is documented as "auto-approve permissions that are not explicitly denied (dangerous!)" and
its default is false. Always pass it. Without --auto a non-interactive run cannot prompt,
so it auto-rejects any permission request and exits 1 with a stderr diagnostic naming the
cause — the task will not have completed.
--auto is not a blanket bypass: it respects the configured auto-approval settings, and anything not
auto-approved is still refused. A "deny" rule always wins. A full bypass is a config-level change
({"permission": "allow"} in the user's kilo.jsonc), which is the user's call, not yours.
Never select a plan-style agent with --agent. --agent chooses which configured agent runs the
task. A planning agent writes a plan for itself and waits for approval, which headless mode cannot
give. Keep the default agent and write "report only, no edits" in the Output field when you want
no file changes.
Models and how to list them
Run kilo models for the identifiers this install accepts, optionally filtered by provider with
kilo models <provider>. Select with -m/--model <provider/model>. Credentials are managed with
kilo auth (alias kilo providers).
If the user names a model, use it. Otherwise ask the binary first. For capability and price comparisons, check Artificial Analysis and the vendor's own documentation.
Command pattern
kilo run "GOAL: [goal] | DECISIONS: [decisions] | SCOPE: [absolute paths] | CONSTRAINTS: [constraints] | VERIFICATION: [test_command] | OUTPUT: [format]" \
--auto --model <provider/model> --dir /absolute/path/to/repo --print-logs 2>&1For a long run, prefer backgrounding the call and watching the log over a blocking call with a guessed deadline:
kilo run "[prompt]" --auto --print-logs > /tmp/kilo-run.log 2>&1 &Prompt examples
- Implement:
kilo run "GOAL: [goal] | SCOPE: [absolute paths] | VERIFICATION: [test_command] | OUTPUT: files changed" --auto --dir /abs/repo - Review:
kilo run "GOAL: Review [scope] for [concerns] | CONSTRAINTS: do not edit any file | OUTPUT: findings with severity" --auto --format json --dir /abs/repo - Investigate (background, watch log):
kilo run "GOAL: Map how [feature] works | SCOPE: [absolute paths] | CONSTRAINTS: do not edit any file | OUTPUT: file:line map" --auto --print-logs > /tmp/kilo-run.log 2>&1 &
Docs and reference
- Flags, models, approvals, skills and paths: reference.md
- Vendor documentation: https://kilo.ai/docs/code-with-ai/platforms/cli
- Checked on 2026-11-05. Flags were last run against
kilo7.7.6 (--help,run --help,models --help). Latest release on npm (@kilocode/cli) is 7.8.27; kilo is not installed here, so the flags were not re-run on it. The vendor docs page says it applies to Kilo 1.0 and later and does not state--auto's default. A full delegation was not run, because that needs provider credentials.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

