agentleFS
amirkiarafieiamirkiarafiei/subagent-cli-skills/skills/copilot-cli/SKILL.md

copilot-cli

Skill14 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use GitHub Copilot CLI as a subagent. Lets the main agent prompt GitHub Copilot CLI from the terminal in headless mode with the `copilot` command, and send the goal, the decisions and the scope with the task. Use when the user asks to delegate work to GitHub Copilot CLI, when a task needs a second independent agent, or when a plan needs a fresh perspective.

  • Pipes a download into a shell
  • Installs packages

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Secrets or policy-sensitive work: Do not pipe credentials into a subagent.

    line 48
  2. Distinctive:

    Low return on investment: If writing the handoff costs more than doing the edit, do the edit.

    line 50
  3. Distinctive:

    Treat every call as stateless delegation: the subagent keeps nothing between calls, so each command must carry its own state.

    line 61
  4. Distinctive:

    Write the prompt as a transfer of shared state, not as a title.

    line 71
  5. Distinctive:

    Prefer sequential delegations with explicit carry-over.

    line 82
  6. Distinctive:

    After the subagent returns:

    line 96
  7. Distinctive:

    Every vendor has its own terminal rules.

    line 104
  8. Distinctive:

    Exit code 0 is not success: If stdout is empty, treat the run as failed and read stderr.

    line 108
  9. Very specific:

    Keep all seven sub-headings, in this order, even if the answer is "none".

    line 119
  10. Very specific:

    What happens with nobody to answer: not documented for a call outside every allow flag in headless mode.

    line 154
  11. Very specific:

    No CLI subcommand or flag to print the model catalog is documented.

    line 160
  12. Very specific:

    If the user names a model, use it.

    line 166

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

GitHub Copilot CLI (subagent / task delegation)

<!-- ============================================================================= GLOBAL HALF — sections 1 to 5. These sections are identical in every skill in this repository. Copy them without any change. Do not put a vendor name or a flag in them. A change here must be made in all skills at the same time. ============================================================================= -->

What is it

This skill teaches your agent to use an agent from another vendor as a subagent.

Almost every coding agent has a headless mode. Headless mode runs the agent from the terminal with one command and returns the answer to stdout. This skill gives the command pattern for one such agent, and the protocol to transfer enough context with the task.

You stay the main agent. You keep the plan, the decisions and the conversation with the user. The subagent does one bounded task and reports back.

When to delegate

  • The user asks for it. The user names another agent, or asks for a second opinion.
  • Large or multi-step work. The task covers several files, phases or checkpoints.
  • Code review with a fresh mind. Another agent reviews the work with a different lens and no memory of the decisions that produced it.
  • Planning that needs different ideas. A second agent proposes options that you did not consider.
  • An internal council. Several subagents answer the same question, and you compare the answers.
  • Deep research. The other CLI has web search, web extraction or browser automation.
  • Background investigation. A long task runs in the background while you continue in the foreground.

When not to delegate

  • Small or single-step tasks. One or two edits, or a short explanation, are faster in this thread.
  • Tight feedback loops. The user wants quick back-and-forth in one conversation.
  • Secrets or policy-sensitive work. Do not pipe credentials into a subagent. Redact first.
  • Context you already hold. Repeating the whole plan in a prompt adds no value.
  • Low return on investment. If writing the handoff costs more than doing the edit, do the edit.
  • Work that needs high precision and full judgement. A subagent without your context will break a task that depends on a detail only this session knows.

Delegation and context transfer protocol

An isolated subagent saves tokens, but it splits the story. The subagent does not see this conversation. It has no memory of the goal you agreed with the user, the decisions you already made, or the paths you agreed not to touch. A poor handoff causes misread tasks, wrong assumptions about the stack or the style, and wasted edits.

Treat every call as stateless delegation: the subagent keeps nothing between calls, so each command must carry its own state. A good handoff happens when you keep these practices in mind:

  • Shared state handoff. The prompt carries the original goal, the decisions already made, and the explicit scope, to bridge the subagent's missing session history.
  • Contextual preservation. The high-volume work stays in the isolated process, so the bulk never enters this conversation and no "split story" forms from missing history.
  • Result reconciliation. What comes back is folded into this thread afterwards, so there is a single source of truth.

Write the prompt as a transfer of shared state, not as a title. Include all six fields:

IncludeWhy
GoalThe same objective as the user, not only the immediate micro-task.
DecisionsFramework, patterns, naming, "use X not Y" — anything that would otherwise be guessed wrong.
ScopeThe absolute paths and modules to touch, and the areas to leave alone. A relative path may not resolve where you expect.
ConstraintsPerformance, accessibility, compatibility, review gates, "no new dependencies".
VerificationThe exact command the subagent must run and pass before it returns.
OutputFor example: "report only, no edits", "apply edits with a minimal diff", "list the files changed".

Prefer sequential delegations with explicit carry-over. Parallel runs diverge unless every run gets the same briefing.

Run the subagent in the mode that does the work without asking for approval. Headless mode has nobody to answer a permission prompt. Any mode that stops to ask will stall, or return an empty answer with a success exit code. Each CLI names this mode differently — take the flag from the vendor card below.

Never call a subagent in plan mode. Many CLIs have a plan or read-only mode. That mode makes the other agent write a plan for itself, which is not what you asked for: you want its work or its answer, and you keep the planning. Plan mode also waits for someone to approve that plan, so the run comes back with nothing. If you want no file changes, keep the auto-approving mode and write "report only, no edits" in the Output field. Do not use plan mode to make a run read-only.

After the subagent returns:

  • Report to the user. Give a short summary. Do not paste long logs unless the user asks.
  • Reconcile the context. Record the decisions it made, the files it changed, and the open risks, so this session stays the single source of truth.

CLI failure modes

Every vendor has its own terminal rules. A headless run fails quietly more often than it fails loudly.

  • Wrap the call in an external timeout. A headless CLI can stall before its own timeout starts.
  • Exit code 0 is not success. If stdout is empty, treat the run as failed and read stderr. A permission the CLI could not ask for, and a prompt that never arrived, both look like success.
  • Never carry a flag habit from one CLI to another. The same short flag means different things in different tools. In OpenCode, -p is --password: passing a prompt to it empties the message and the run waits on stdin forever. Confirm every flag against the CLI's own --help.
  • An unrecognized-flag error means this skill is stale, not that the task is impossible. Read --help, continue with the flags that exist, and tell the user which line in this file is wrong.
<!-- ============================================================================= VENDOR HALF — section 6. Everything below is specific to this CLI. Keep all seven sub-headings, in this order, even if the answer is "none". Take every flag from the installed binary (`<cli> --help`), not from memory and not from another skill in this repository. ============================================================================= -->

Vendor card

Binary and prompt form

  • Binary: copilot
  • Install: npm install -g @github/copilot (needs Node.js 22 or later). Other documented routes: brew install --cask copilot-cli and curl -fsSL https://gh.io/copilot-install | bash.
  • Prompt form: flag. The prompt is the value of -p / --prompt, e.g. copilot -p "prompt text" — "execute a prompt in non-interactive mode; the CLI runs the prompt and exits when done." A bare copilot with no -p opens the interactive interface and never returns. Piped stdin also works: echo "Fix this bug" | copilot -p.

Headless and output flags

NeedFlag
Run once and exit-p, --prompt <PROMPT>
Output only the agent's response, no decorations/stats-s
Output format--output-format=text or json (JSONL, one object per line)
Attach a file to the initial prompt--attachment <path> (images or native documents)
Export the session transcript to Markdown--share [path]

Approvals and permissions

  • --allow-all (alias --yolo) — grants all permissions (tools and URL fetches).
  • --allow-all-tools — narrower: allows every tool to run without per-call confirmation, but not paths or URLs. copilot --help calls it "required for non-interactive mode" (env COPILOT_ALLOW_ALL), so every -p run needs it, or --allow-all.
  • --allow-tool=<TOOL>, --allow-url=<URL> — grant only specific tools/URLs; the official docs recommend this narrower form over --allow-all outside a sandbox.
  • --deny-tool=<TOOL>, --deny-url=<URL> — explicit denials.
  • What happens with nobody to answer: not documented for a call outside every allow flag in headless mode. Do not rely on a graceful denial. Pass --allow-all, or --allow-all-tools with --deny-tool limits, before you run headless. --allow-tool alone is not enough for -p.

Models and how to list them

No CLI subcommand or flag to print the model catalog is documented. The official docs say: "to see the model strings for all available models, run the /model command in an interactive Copilot CLI session" — there is no headless-only way to list them. Copilot is a multi-provider gateway, so availability varies by plan, org policy, and region. Select with --model=<identifier>; pick a custom agent with --agent=<AGENT>.

If the user names a model, use it. Otherwise start an interactive session once to run /model and capture the current identifiers, and check Artificial Analysis for capability and price comparisons — default to the cheapest suitable tier.

Command pattern

copilot -p "GOAL: [goal] | DECISIONS: [decisions] | SCOPE: [paths, @ FILENAME as needed] | CONSTRAINTS: [constraints] | VERIFICATION: [test_command] | OUTPUT: [format]" \
  --allow-all -s --model=<identifier> 2>&1

With a specific custom agent:

copilot -p "[task]" --agent=<agent-name> --allow-all -s 2>&1

Prompt examples

  • Implement: copilot -p "GOAL: [goal] | DECISIONS: [decisions] | SCOPE: [paths] | CONSTRAINTS: [constraints] | VERIFICATION: [test_command] | OUTPUT: [format]" --allow-all -s
  • Investigate: copilot -p "GOAL: Map how [feature] works | SCOPE: [paths] | CONSTRAINTS: report only, no edits | OUTPUT: concise file:line map" --allow-all-tools --deny-tool=write --deny-tool=shell -s
  • Audit: copilot -p "GOAL: Audit the codebase for security issues | SCOPE: [paths] | CONSTRAINTS: report only, no edits | OUTPUT: security report" --allow-all -s

Docs and reference

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.