development-workflow
AGENTS.md1 starsChanged 21 days agoMITView on GitHub
These instructions apply to every file in this repository unless a more local AGENTS.md overrides them. Development Workflow is an open-source, agent-agnostic set of coding-agent skills that carry a change from problem to integration. It ships adapters for Claude Code and Codex. Optimize contributions for clarity, portability, and practical use, not for the feature set of a single agent. - Read the root README.md and the relevant directory documentation before changing a skill. - Treat skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md as the canonical definition…
Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.
Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,774 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- brainstormingSkill
- development-workflowSkill
- exploringSkill
- finishing-developmentSkill
- requesting-reviewSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- writing-skillsSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈14
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Read the root README.md and the relevant directory documentation before changing a skill.
- Very specific: line 17
Treat skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md as the canonical definition of a skill.
- Very specific: line 18
When you add, remove, or change a workflow skill under skills/, update the guide in docs/development-workflow/ in the same change so its …
- Very specific: line 24
Treat agents/<role>.md as the canonical role definition: what a role runs, what it produces, and its non-negotiables, in plain capability …
- Very specific: line 26
Keep harness-specific configuration in adapters/<harness>/.
- Distinctive: line 30
Do not duplicate essential instructions across adapters.
- Distinctive: line 33
Keep changes scoped. Do not reformat or rewrite unrelated material.
- Distinctive: line 34
Prefer direct, testable instructions over broad advice or lengthy background.
- Distinctive: line 35
Use progressive disclosure: place detailed examples, specifications, and source notes in supporting files.
- Distinctive: line 37
Use lowercase kebab-case for skill directory names.
- Distinctive: line 38
Use relative links for files within the repository and verify that new links resolve.
- Distinctive: line 40
Use ASCII by default unless the content requires otherwise.
- Distinctive: line 44
Do not copy an external skill into the collection without review.
- Distinctive: line 46
Document its repository, author or organization, license, and revision.
- Distinctive: line 49
Remove redundant, overly broad, or untestable instructions.
- Very specific: line 54
If licensing is absent or unclear, record notes in docs/ but do not copy the source material into skills/.
- Distinctive: line 61
Check headings, code blocks, and relative links.
- Distinctive: line 63
Read instructions from the perspective of an agent with no prior context.
- Very specific: line 77
Run scripts/check.sh before you finish.
- Distinctive: line 87
When completing work, summarize what changed, what was validated, and any open licensing or portability questions.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Repository Instructions
These instructions apply to every file in this repository unless a more local
AGENTS.md overrides them.
Purpose
Development Workflow is an open-source, agent-agnostic set of coding-agent skills that carry a change from problem to integration. It ships adapters for Claude Code and Codex. Optimize contributions for clarity, portability, and practical use, not for the feature set of a single agent.
Working rules
- Read the root
README.mdand the relevant directory documentation before changing a skill. - Treat
skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.mdas the canonical definition of a skill. - When you add, remove, or change a workflow skill under
skills/, update the guide indocs/development-workflow/in the same change so its plain-language pages never drift from the canonicalSKILL.mdfiles. Followdocs/development-workflow/maintaining.mdto find which page to edit. - Treat
agents/<role>.mdas the canonical role definition: what a role runs, what it produces, and its non-negotiables, in plain capability terms. - Keep harness-specific configuration in
adapters/<harness>/. An adapter wires the canonical files into a harness - tool limits, dispatch names, hooks - and points at them rather than restating any procedure. Do not pin models; workers inherit the session's model. - Do not duplicate essential instructions across adapters. Link to or generate from the canonical material where practical. When an adapter and a canonical file disagree, the canonical file wins and the adapter is the bug.
- Keep changes scoped. Do not reformat or rewrite unrelated material.
- Prefer direct, testable instructions over broad advice or lengthy background.
- Use progressive disclosure: place detailed examples, specifications, and source notes in supporting files.
- Use lowercase kebab-case for skill directory names.
- Use relative links for files within the repository and verify that new links resolve.
- Use ASCII by default unless the content requires otherwise.
Reviewing external skills
Do not copy an external skill into the collection without review.
- Document its repository, author or organization, license, and revision.
- Explain what problem it solves and which parts are worth retaining.
- Identify assumptions tied to a particular agent, operating system, or tool.
- Remove redundant, overly broad, or untestable instructions.
- Rewrite the selected behavior into the repository's canonical format.
- Preserve required attribution and confirm that the source license permits adaptation and redistribution.
If licensing is absent or unclear, record notes in docs/ but do not copy the
source material into skills/.
Validation
For documentation-only changes:
- Check headings, code blocks, and relative links.
- Confirm examples match the documented directory layout.
- Read instructions from the perspective of an agent with no prior context.
For any change under skills/ or agents/:
- Confirm the guide in
docs/development-workflow/was updated in the same change, or state explicitly why no doc change was needed (for example, a change with no effect on phases, loops, gates, artifacts, or roles). - Confirm the catalog in
skills/README.mdstill lists every skill, and that any affected adapter underadapters/still resolves. - For a skill containing a repeat-until loop, confirm it has all four brakes: a blocking threshold, a narrowing round scope, memory of settled decisions, and a round budget ending in escalation. An unbounded loop is a defect, not rigour.
Run scripts/check.sh before you finish. It syntax-checks every shell script,
runs shellcheck when installed, and verifies every relative Markdown link.
For scripts or executable assets, run the narrowest relevant checks and record
any environment requirements in the skill. Hook scripts under adapters/ must be
syntax-checked and executed against both a triggering and a non-triggering input
before the change is accepted.
Communication
When completing work, summarize what changed, what was validated, and any open licensing or portability questions. Do not claim compatibility with an agent that was not tested.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

